Talk:Hudson Terminal

Hudson Terminal has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New York City Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 10, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

A fact from Hudson Terminal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that New York City's Hudson Terminal, once billed as the world's largest office building by floor area, was demolished as part of an agreement to develop the World Trade Center?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hudson Terminal.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DanCherek (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that New York City's Hudson Terminal was constructed as two buildings after the city government would not allow the closure of a street between the two structures? Source: Landau, Sarah; Condit, Carl W. (1996). Rise of the New York Skyscraper, 1865–1913. Yale University Press. p. 326
- ALT1:... that a vacant building at New York City's Hudson Terminal was set on fire just before it was demolished to make way for the World Trade Center? Source: Lee, Vincent (April 16, 1972). "Chiefs Play Arson in Skyscraper". New York Daily News. p. 232.
- ALT2:... that New York City's Hudson Terminal, once billed as the world's largest office building by floor area, was demolished as part of an agreement to develop the World Trade Center? Source: (1) "Hudson Tube Terminal Plans Are Announced; Largest Office Building in the World at Manhattan End". The New York Times. December 23, 1906. (2) Burks, Edward C. (October 19, 1971). "World Trade Center Rising In Noisy, Confusing World". The New York Times. Technically it was 2 buildings, but was billed as one.
- ALT3:... that the last remnant of New York City's Hudson Terminal, which had been replaced by the World Trade Center, was removed after the World Trade Center was destroyed? Source: Dunlap, David W. (October 26, 2008). "Another Ghost from Ground Zero's Past Fades Away". The New York Times

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sandra Wolin

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 21:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Epicgenius, QPQ needed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Thanks for the review. I have done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]