Talk:Meg Myers

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability

I believe that Meg Myers is a significant, up-and-coming artist who deserves inclusion on wikipedia because of the attention she has played multiple gigs at the prestigious Viper Room and garnered attention from Carson Daily and the New Music Seminar - Artist On the Verge series. I included these facts in the article.

Meg Myers and Doctor Rosen Rosen have been marketing her music to the public for less than a year. If their popularity and notoriety has not increased significantly over the course of the next 1-2 years, then I would agree at that time that they no longer meet the inclusion guideline for notoriety.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kemery720 (talk • contribs)

No, we will not wait 1-2 years in anticipation that the subject might become notable. Either the subject is currently notable (and therefore would remain so even if not a single word were ever written about her again), or the subject is not notable at this time. After you posted this message here, the article has been nominated for deletion; if the discussion determines that the article should be kept then I certainly have no objection to removing the notability tag. Kemery, you are welcome to contribute to the deletion discussion. You may want to review the relevant notability guidelines at WP:GNG and WP:BAND first, since opinions framed in the context of notability guidelines are often given more consideration. VQuakr (talk) 01:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

VQuakr, thanks for your help. It looks like the article survived the deletion discussion. I'll leave the notification up for a little while before I take it down, then.75.166.194.27 (talk) 02:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The cover image from Daughter In The Choir was removed for copyright reasons. I've e-mailed WMG in an attempt to get permission to use the image, and I've posted a reply to one of Meg's images on her artist Facebook profile asking her permission to use an image from her facebook. I think the current cover image in this article, for "Make A Shadow" is probably copyrighted also, and besides, she is too small in the image for it to really be appropriate for this article. Any assistance or ideas on a more appropriate image that isn't already copyrighted would be appreciated.Kemery72 (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Raghuveersingh mepha (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Career' section?

This may come down to my unfamiliarity with guidelines regarding music artists in general, but is there any reason why the Career section sounds less like a Wikipedia entry and more like an overly friendly press interview or promo sheet? I mean, "Music has always been an emotional release for Myers"? Really? I'm not asking to be snarky, I'm genuinely curious and I don't want to strike that stuff out if it's allowed. Tmcmistress (talk) 20:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... if there are copyright issues, then it should be edited. Deleting an encyclopedic entry would be like deleting someone from history. Leave the page, change the content.

--2601:983:8001:5B1E:70FB:D208:487D:B5AE (talk) 17:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:983:8001:5B1E:70FB:D208:487D:B5AE: If so, you could WP:TNT it. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 18:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]