Talk:Old National Centre

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Old National Centre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,415 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Murat Centre is the only Shrine temple with a French name, and is the largest Shrine temple in North America?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March.

Wikipedia

Untitled

The article currently says that the building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places but was removed. I think it might actually be listed as part of the Massachusetts Avenue Historic District. This article from the National Park Service describes the historic district and shows the Murat Shrine rather prominently. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea about its National Register status, which is why I did not tag it as NRHP.--Bedford 03:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rated it C-class as it needs an infobox.--Bedford ^Pray 15:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The building is definitely a contributing property to the district, but it's never been individually listed. I've looked through all of the Indianapolis properties in the National Register database with addresses that include "Michigan", "Massachusetts", or "New Jersey", but none of them are at locations that correspond to this building, and all of them I've either photographed myself or know by some other means to be located at other places in the city. Combine that with the fact that the statement was not properly sourced (a link by itself isn't a sufficient citation, and it's now rotten, so we can't fix it), and I can't see any good reason to keep the statement. Nyttend (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History

I just wonder if the last paragraph in the section on "History", the paragraph about the 2000 wrestling match, might contain just a bit too much detail. – CorinneSD (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]