Talk:PDVSA

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy High‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Venezuela Top‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ank221024.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many of Chaves' workers have been accused of being heterosexual bear-wrestlers. Chaves denied the claims. [5] Chaves' has stated several times that all of his workers are flaming homosexuals.

wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.206.236.82 (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3.2 trillion barrels of oil reserves

Basically, this figure should be contextualized. Proven reserves would be a much more appropriate figure to display instead (some 77.8 barrels, i think... if you include heavy oil you'd bring it up to some 310billion). The above figure really doesn't mean anything as of now. In fact, that figure creates the appearance that Venezuela has more oil than Saudi Arabia, which is doesn't. " Venezuela has 3.2 trillion barrels of oil reserves, according to PDVSA figures, the largest in the Western Hemisphere and making up approximately half the total. This puts Venezuela as fifth in the world in proven reserves of conventional oil." --Patpecz 20:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ILO

In the article: "The International Labour Organization (ILO) sentenced that those employees must be reinstated in their jobs." In English, "sentenced" is not possible in this context: it means specifically the imposition of a punishment. I'm guessing that this is in the sense of the Spanish sentencia (English: "verdict" or, if an administrative rather than judicial context, "ruling"), but even so I'm not sure what it means to say. Was this a judicial hearing? Did Venezuela recognize the authority of the ILO in this matter? When exactly was this verdict/ruling made? As it stands, it's very confusing, it only hints at something. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:46, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I searched the entire UN site, and can find no trace of this. The ILO has "conventions," and "recomendations," and can "voice concerns," but as far as I know, it is not a judicial body, it does not make judgements or impose sentences. I am editing this entry with the one citation that I could find. --VonWoland 06:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pdvsa.png

Image:Pdvsa.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citgo percentage?

Is it 100% like it says in the article or 84.12% like it says in the info box? --199.227.86.10 (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

100%. The 82.14 was the (out-of-date) % for Electricidad de Caracas. I've updated the article, including the infobox. Rd232 ^talk 11:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Date of founding?

The article states that PDVSA was founded on January 1, 1976, but the sidebar claims that it was founded in 1975. Obviously, one of these is wrong. Can someone take a look at that? Bk2204 (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Their website says 1975[1] --JRSP (talk) 01:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suppport from Brazil

The article writes:"In December 2002 many of PDVSA's managers and employees (including the CTV trade union federation) locked out workers to pressure Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to call early elections, and virtually stopped oil production for 2 months. The government fired 19,000 employees and reestablished production with employees loyal to the Chávez government."

Well, then Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso sent two big Brazilian oil tankers with many fuels to Venezuela, to support his friend Hugo Chavez. Brazilian governments are supporting Venezuela since Hugo Chavez took power.Agre22 (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

You mean Lula, not Cardoso. You mean when Chavez was "voted into office", not "took power", which he didn't. He is dead.

"Politicization" section clearly POV

Clearly POV section. References are not neutral, wording is clearly anti-chavist, and quotes and references are highly selective in order to push an anti-Chavez POV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.226.158 (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is PDVSA doing in sustainability engineering?

I would like the major fossil fuel company articles to indicate how they intend to transition to carbon-neutral fuels such as this work and "power to gas." I need to know whether they support emerging chemical engineering research such as catalysts for carbon-neutral transportation fuels, whether they are working on compressed air energy storage such as [2] and [3], airborne wind turbines such as [4], and on extracting carbon from seawater such as this PARC method in order to solve their long-term corporate viability issues. I do not believe it is possible to have a truly balanced article on a fossil fuel company without some indication of their long term prospects. Tim AFS (talk) 04:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also need to know whether they are developing electrical grid energy storage in their existing expended oil and gas caverns along with mineshafts and mines for pumped-storage hydroelectricity where ordinary hydroelectric power is unavailable. Tim AFS (talk) 09:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on PDVSA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in PDVSA

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of PDVSA's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nasdaq":

From BP: "BP Close to GoM Assets Sale – Analyst Blog". Zacks Equity Research. NASDAQ. 9 September 2012. Retrieved 10 September 2012.
From 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis: "Regime change hopes bolster Venezuela bonds". NASDAQ. Retrieved 20 January 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Systemic bias tag

@Sisgeo: I see that you added the {{Systemic bias}} tag in this article last year in June, but the edit summary simply read "Updating template". Could you please provide more details about this? Best wishes, NoonIcarus (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]