Talk:Pap of Armenia/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 14:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a Y

2.b Y

2.c Y

2.d Y
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No dead links Y
No missing citations N By the end of the summer, Shapur II had retreated to his capital at Ctesiphon and Valens went back to Antioch. Shapur II was unable to confront the massive Roman buildup in Armenia as a result of his preoccupation with Kushan attacks in the eastern part of his empire. Thus, Roman control over Armenia through the client king Pap was secure for the time being.
Pap is a character in the tragedy Nerses the Great, Patron of Armenia written in 1857, by the 19th-century Armenian playwright, actor and editor, Sargis Vanandetsi (Sargis Mirzayan).

Pap is the titular character of the historical novel Pap Tagavor by Stepan Zoryan, first published in 1944. @Revolution Saga: these need citations. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like this is your first time nominating a GA article per tools, apologies if this isn't true; generally GAs should have all prose text cited, and content such as footnotes will need to be cited if you wish to take this to a MILHIST A-class review or FAC, if you wish to do that after this review. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, lede material does not generally need to be cited unless it is not supported and cited in the body. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Revolution Saga: re-pinging. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the suggestions and info, will make changes accordingly Revolution Saga (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: I've added the missing citations you requested. --Dallavid (talk) 19:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dallavid: Excellent, I shall continue with my suggestions. Thank you! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Revolution Saga: Apologies for the slow pace, I'll try to wrap up my part of the review this week. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Revolution Saga and Dallavid: That is all of my suggestions, outside from the dating disagreement in the lede and body as to his birth, the article is good, but could benefit from some edits for readability. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your helpful suggestions! I have implemented most of them. I will work on adding a historiography section soon. Best, Revolution Saga (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Prose Suggestions

Please note that almost all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion. Any changes I deem necessary for the article to pass GA standards I will bold.

Lede

In the lede his birthday is given as c.353, but in the body, it is given as seemingly 351, 353, or 360 (assuming this is not meant to be 353—360, I can only see the actual numbers in Manandyan as I can't read Armenian, can machine translate Sargsyan). Suggest 351, 353, or 360–374/375, if these are the supported dates, and adding these three dates as a birth_date=.
was King of Armenia from 370 until 374/375. A member of the Arsacid dynasty, his reign saw a short, but notable period of stabilization after years of political turmoil. suggest restructuring to was King of Armenia from 370 until 374/375, and a member of the Arsacid dynasty. His reign saw a short, but notable period of stabilization after years of political turmoil.
Pap ascended to the throne at a young age with Roman assistance in 370 after Armenia had been conquered and devastated by the Sassanid king Shapur II. suggest Although Armenia had been conquered and devastated by the Sassanid king Shapur II in 367/368, Pap was restored to the throne at a young age with Roman assistance in 370.
culminating in his alleged murder by poisoning of Nerses I, Patriarch of Armenia. it's important here to mention that this poisoning is possible propaganda, suggest Pap allegedly had the Patriarch of Armenia, Nerses I, poisoned, however, some later historians doubt this narrative.
The emperor Valens had him assassinated (after an initial unsuccessful attempt) in 374/375. suggest The emperor Valens unsuccessfully attempted to assassinate him in 374/375, but ultimately succeded in having him killed 375.
The classical Armenian historians are hostile to Pap and ascribe to him an array of sins, chief among which being the murder of Nerses I.[1] This attitude toward Pap has been explained by the king's troublesome relationship with the Armenian Church, caused by his promotion of Arianism and efforts to limit the church's power and influence.[1] The Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus, on the other hand, presents a more favorable image of Pap, whom he praises for his bravery and cleverness.[3][4] Some later Armenian historians reevaluated Pap in a positive light, considering him an unjust victim of pro-church historians and valuing his attempts to strengthen the Armenian monarchy and pursue an independent foreign policy under difficult circumstances. a lot of this seems to exist in the lede and not the body (outside of some bits about religious policy in the King of Armenia section), strongly suggest creating a "Historiography" section in the body and moving this there, and providing a briefer summary in the lede.

Ascendance to the throne

(Arshak is said to have committed suicide in captivity a few years later). suggest transferring this to a footnote.
Shapur II may have intended to combine Sassanid administrative rule (Zik and Karen) with that of nakharar rule (Artsruni and Mamikonian) should explain a bit more about what this means. Was he attempting to merge two dual administrations into one, to consolidate, or else was he stripping nobility of their ranks?
(alternatively, at the request of Cylaces and Artabanes) The alternatively here seems to mean according to other sources, at the request of Cylaces and Artabanes, so I would just change it to that, and perhaps add a footnote for source disagreement; unless Lenski themselves believes it may be either one, in which case I suggest Or possibly, at the request of Cylaces and Artabanes
(Nina Garsoïan places Pap's return earlier, c. 367) I would make this a footnote or else discuss the dating dispute in greater detail.

King of Armenia

Valens was reluctant to bestow a royal title upon Pap --Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)in order not to violate an earlier treaty signed by Jovian in July 363, suggest Valens was reluctant to bestow a royal title upon Pap as this would violate an earlier treaty signed by Jovian in July 363,[reply]
(some authors believe Shapur's correspondence with Pap occurred only after he was restored to the throne) would move to a footnote and name specific historians.
emerged victorious (called the Battle of Bagavan or Vagabanta) suggest emerged victorious at the Battle of Bagavan
Christian in name only and that he was sympathetic towards paganism/Zoroastrianism unless there's allegations that he was some other form of pagan, suggest just Christian in name only and that he was sympathetic towards Zoroastrianism
accumulated significant estates and wealth in the form of the benevolent institutions created by Nerses under Arshak II's reign what is meant here by benevolent? That these were charities, or that it was good for the country, or for the church itself? If the first suggest changing benevolent to charitable, if the second, retain (but probably will have to expand upon as it's important context if so, if the last, suggest lucrative rather than benevolent
(371 or 372 according to other estimates) suggest making into a footnote with names of disputing authors.
The king then dissolved the benevolent institutions established by Nerses same suggestion as with the above usage of benevolent
ptghi and tasanord (tithes) it seems like these are both tithes (and I have struggled to find english sources about them), so I would suggest removing the paranthesis to make it ptghi and tasanord tithes
Pap nominated a certain Husik as a replacement and sent him for consecration in Caesarea, the usage of the scholarly "Certain" to speculate on a person doesn't translate well to laymen, in my experience, and suggests that Husik might be a title, rather than person. Suggest removing a certain, and perhaps changing it to a man named Husik (with any background that might be useful and available)

Fall

who wrote to the emperor criticizing Pap and advising him to get rid of the Armenian king suggest who wrote to the emperor criticizing Pap and advising him to depose the Armenian king
Valens decided to execute Pap and invited him to a meeting in Tarsus. Pap arrived with 300 mounted escorts but quickly became anxious when he found out the emperor was not there in person, fleeing back toward Armenia and fighting off a legion that was sent after him.[40][41] suggest Valens decided to have Pap executed, and invited him to a meeting in Tarsus. Pap arrived with 300 mounted scores, but became worried by the absence of the emperor, and therefore fled back to Armenia, and fought off a legion that was sent after him.
who failed to capture and execute Pap suggest removing and execute
under the regency of Mushegh Mamikonian (the Mamikonians were the chief pro-Roman noble house in Armenia) suggest under the regency of Mushegh Mamikonian, as the Mamikonians were the chief pro-Roman noble house in Armenia).
replacement with a Roman nominee provoked a Persian reaction; however, Shapur did not invade and took only diplomatic action suggest replacement with a Roman nominee provoked Persian outrage; however, Shapur did not invade and took only diplomatic action.

@Iazyges: All suggestions are

Done --Dallavid (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.