Talk:Pennybacker Bridge

United States: Texas / Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Mid-importance).

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarification

The article says, "At the time of its construction, it was only the second bridge of its design in the world." There are a number of previous Compression arch suspended-deck bridges, e.g. Bayonne, Hell Gate, Sydney, Hernando de Soto etc., so this must refer to something less obvious (at least, less obvious to this reader). Can someone clarify what this means? -- Gyrofrog (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why it says that. That sounds like something from a Highway Department brochure - bragging and inaccurate. I have noted in the article that this is a "through arch bridge" and linked that article, and listed this bridge in that article. I'd remove the "only the second bridge of its design" statement if I knew that it was false, but there are no references and there might be something unique about this bridge. 24.27.31.170 (talk) 05:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Eric[reply]

The article currently states that the bridge is made of 600,000,000 lbs of steel. It is likely that the bridge is composed of far less steel than that. For one, the spot price of steel is usually in the hundreds of dollars per metric ton, meaning that the cost of the steel would be in the hundreds of millions. The page lists the cost of the bridge as being $10 million. 66.112.249.122 (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on the previous comment, the first external reference lists the weight of steel at 600 tons, which is 1,200,000 lbs. of steel. This incorrect information has been quoted in numerous other articles on the bridge which sourced their material from here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.210.43.150 (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]