Talk:Pichichi Trophy

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Spain Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tally

There seems to be an edit war going on right now. The proper tally is 37 for Ronaldo, 31 for Messi. This is according to Marca, the paper that awards the trophy: http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/trofeos/2010-2011/pichichi-zamora/pichichi-primera.html. Yes, it's true that Ronaldo's official league tally is only 36. Marca controversially awarded Ronaldo a goal that deflected off of a defensive player, a goal that the league ruled to be an own goal. The controversy is worth mentioning in this article, but there is no reason to keep changing the tally back and forth. Marca awards the trophy, so Marca's tally is the only one that matters. Xcolour (talk) 03:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo 2010-2011

the correct number for goals is 41. Please see this link http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/trofeos/2010-2011/pichichi-zamora/pichichi-primera.html--190.7.201.2 (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The correct tally for Ronaldo is that which is officialy recognized by Liga de Fútbol Profesional and the Royal Spanish Football Federation. So if they recognize the number 41 than that is the correct number and if they recognize 40 than its actually 40. Whatever a newspaper says its irrelevant as they are not the governing body of Spanish football and their La Liga.Ratipok (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This article about Pichihi Trophy (Marca (!)), not about LFP statistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.89.186.113 (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this article is about PICHICHI TROPHY, thus the "officialy recognized" is that of Diario Marca, and NOT Liga de Fútbol Profesional or the Royal Spanish Football Federation.

If you want a page about top goalscorer of la Liga then, NOT NAME THIS AS PICHICHI TROPHY, PLEASE!!!! --190.7.201.2 (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC) http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/trofeos/2010-2011/pichichi-zamora/pichichi-primera.html http://www.marca.com/2011/10/03/futbol/equipos/real_madrid/1317645445.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.7.201.2 (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pichichi Trophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304084634/http://www.rsssf.com/tabless/spantops.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tabless/spantops.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]