Talk:Pithoragarh district

India: Districts / Uttarakhand Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Mid-importance).

Population: given as "4,62,149" - there's either a figure missing, or it is wrongly formatted. Can someone confirm the correct figure? - MPF 18:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

About population figure

The figure 4,62,149 is correct,taken from cesus of india 2001. Being a Himalayan hilly district, the popualation density is very low

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I don't know why this is rated as low importance, being a third-level subdivision of the country. It's long and has a lot of material, but unfortunately has a lot of early grade-school level language that ranges from ambiguous to incoherent, and I don't have sources and am not familiar with the area enough to fix it. I took a whack at the lead, but when I got down to British Rule, it was more than I could bear at the moment. Please, someone help this article out. :| —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:43, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too many lists

This page has too many long lists with no discussion or offering any insight. This is not how an encyclopaedic article. Please improve it by adding descriptive prose content using reliable sources. Please see MOS:PROSE. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]