Talk:Resultative

Bibliography

Goldberg, A. E. & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language, 80, 532-568. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/stable/4489722

Iwata, S. (2006). Argument Resultatives and Adjunct Resultatives in a Lexical Constructional Account: The Case of Resultatives with Adjectival Result Phrases. Language Sciences, 28(5), 449-496. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.04.001

Levinson, L. (2010). Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28(1), 135-182. Retrieved from: http://ubc.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwVV29CgIxDA6i4HygXX2BlvZ6ba-zeAiCk4c69icdBdH3x_RU0ClkypDw5Qv5A9hIjc73xmrsdK7nxtFkFY3RrQroivyby_lB86GBGd5WMA6703bPP88AeGo7a3jItWHV2eip7M4uuV7ngKg8tjmm6Gv7jhyeiEEQqZAWiy1KhaRKoKRLrGANcyqokcGikGNJEtgyMsxgefHnsb8ejm-1-ariMS0-ifuTEbZPccG1kC-L9zUD

Li, Chao. (2013) Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Simple syntax and complex thematic relations. Language Sciences, 37 May, 99-121. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/llba/docview/1417553431/1411F94EFEA6CC9BFAA/1?accountid=14656

Li, Chao. (2009) On the Headedness of Mandarin Resultative Verb Compounds. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 37 (1), 25-63. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/llba/docview/744446227/1411F6F6F434B9CC2F1/90?accountid=14656

Li, Fengqi. (2011) (Theta-)Structures of Mandarin Resultative Verb Compounds. Linguistik Online, 31-41. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/llba/docview/1018382933/1411F94EFEA6CC9BFAA/4?accountid=14656

Mateo Toledo, E. (2012). Complex predicates in q'anjob'al (maya): The verbal resultative. International Journal of American Linguistics, 78(4), 465-495. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/pdf27_28/pdf/2012/IAL/01Oct12/79980473.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=79980473&S=R&D=ufh&EbscoContent=dGJyMMvl7ESep7I4zdnyOLCmr0uep7dSr6u4S7GWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGrtE+wp7dMuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA

Muller, S. (2005). Resultative constructions: Syntax, world knowledge, and collocational restrictions. Studies in Language, 29(3), 651-651. Retrieved from: http://ubc.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwTV3BCsIwDA2i4HmgvfoDHa3ptu4sDkHw5FCP65KAF0H0_zGbip5CyKGHlJf3aJICrJhjveagVJ9SidIjuW5YW1WIkITxqeDXl_OH5k0GE74toG22x83Ofj4DsNdhGMuGjipGwip5KZyoaogBlTtrgQmqUojJ1eI1VqLHFCgNy_7K3il_TrH3nV_CVAU1G5iJJlatgq3Rgw3Mz_WpjZf94e1mXzd_jINP-f1pFNvHe2Exdy__KzVd

Neeleman, A. & van de Koot, H. (2002). Bare resultatives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 6(1), 1-52. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=15608945&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Richter, M., & van Hout, R. (2013). Interpreting resultative sentences in german: Stages in l1 acquisition.Linguistics, 51(1), 117-144. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/pdf27_28/pdf/2013/0FR/01Jan13/84936796.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=84936796&S=R&D=ufh&EbscoContent=dGJyMMvl7ESep7I4zdnyOLCmr0uep7dSr6a4TbCWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGrtE+wp7dMuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA

Richter, M., & van Hout, R. (2010). Why some verbs can form a resultative construction while others cannot: Decomposing semantic binding. Lingua, 120(8), 2006-2021. Retrieved from: http://ubc.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwVV29CsJADD5Ewbmgt_oCV9rL_c5iEQQni3VMbTIKou-PaVXQKWQIGRK-L4H8KLWpgGJOPgA5GMZz4-SHuvcebI0Uufqby_lB86ZQM7qtVNvsTtu9-TwDMGSlijcsPIMpjMdIXHaACNEJe_YQMEsPYtPAV5soMwaWKh6FmHp2kcUgp4AJ1mouDTVptWAJrEgBWy2OtVp2-dymy-H4VouvWj6mxafy_tSC7VNeGCirFz11NG4

Shibagaki, R., & Guntsetseg, D. (2011). Resultatives in mongolian: between japanese and korean?. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 62, 285-300. Retrieved from http://www.ilg.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/C2/publications/ShibagakiGuntsetseg2011_ResultativesMongolian.pdf

Washio, R. (1997). Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(1), 1-49. Retrieved from: http://ubc.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwVV1NC8IwDC2i4HmgvfoHOlazdM1ZHILgyaEe2zQ7eBBE_z92U0FP4Z1ySHh5gXwotapAGvLoQGpIw7lxwWQjIqxtkKav_uZyfti8LdREbgvVtdvjZmc-zwDM1aK3JsUQmVHQhZCcFyQQ7iELFmHHJE09aPPAkRJBHRNayZUREzleMwSCpZrmhlq0mvU5sNlmstXZsVbzM506f9kf3rD4wvIxLj6V96fO3D7mhYGyegE0PjZq

Pessimarilia (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Traditional view

The "Therefore" is not a therefore. At best, it could be an Accordingly, one might expect... 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:F1C1:1B24:FADF:AC92 (talk) 08:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

unclear statement

"This emphasizes that the resultative describes how a state was acted upon. Therefore, it must use the passive form. However, this analysis (by whom?) does not account for phrases such as "I turned this offer down", which uses the active rather than the passive voice." But, why should it 'have' to be in the passive voice? Stjohn1970 (talk) 20:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

The Guillaumean approach

This section is incomplete. You mention only one aspect.

Hirtle addresses** the psychomechanics of language (G. Guillaume), essentially a theory of the importance of the role of lexis. (Both Sausure and Guillaume agreed that the sentence does not pertain to language, but to speech.)

Hirtle mentions (1) notions of ‘universe time’* (time that contains the event) and (2) ‘event time’ (time contained within the event). <— The second aspect is not stated in this article.

According to Hirtle, (ditto other linguists) English has only two tenses: the Past and the Non-Past.

printed in “Lingua 39” (1976) by North-Holland Publ. Co .

• I call these ‘existentialism’ and ‘temporality’ respectively.

• • Hirtle, W.H. Time, Aspect and the Verb

Les Presses de l'Universite Laval, Québec (1975) Stjohn1970 (talk) 21:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)