Talk:Risk (Megadeth album)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Flat Out (talk · contribs) 14:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Well-written
This article is well-written. clear and covers the material without an overuse of music-related jargon. Spelling and grammar are correct, save for the odd misplaced comma. WP:MOS has been applied throughout. There are no copyright issues. One suggestion would be to remove "as well" from "All three received music videos, as well"it seems redundant to me. 
Done
Verifiable with no original research
The article is well researched and cited correctly and clearly. There are probably only two instances where a citation could be added, for example; The cover for the remaster was noticeably different from the original, featuring a scene from the music video for "Insomnia". and Decibel's Jeff Treppel spoke positively about the album's opener "Insomnia", naming it "one of the best Megadeth songs of the past 15 years." Done
- Found a reference, though it only says that the remix features a different cover.
- The Treppel quote is referenced with source number 7. I placed it at the end of his description.
Broad in its coverage
the article covers the subject well and details all key aspects that you could expect from an album article, without being overly detailed, over-linked or over-referenced. The content is stable and neutral throughout, no giving undue weight at any stage. Coverage of reviews is well handled.
Illustrated
The use of image is appropriate, which is a refreshing change to the overuse of images that often accompanies articles of this type. Images are appropriately tagged and described. The case for non-free use is made adequately.
Additional comment
Well done with this article. It's easy to read, has a good mix of prose, tables and lists and scant use of images which I think aids readability. Under Track-listing and Personnel there is a citation [1] which seems to be floating and might need review. Good job. Flat Out let's discuss it 09:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Moved that reference to the top. Can not provide a link because the booklet isn't placed on Internet.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)