This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
This redirect is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
I believe that these three articles should be merged into one article, as they describe very similar things, with very similar circumstances around them. I have no suggestion as to what title the combined page should be called, though it will not be "Tunisia Effect".
Tunisia Effect is a probably non-notable neologism. Domino theory is a bit different to that of a revolutionary wave, because it is a specific example, and does not necessarily require multiple revolutions, although it is usually presented as such. Either way, there's no advantage in merging a well-developed, notable article on a specific instance of something with a reasonable article on the general concept. Warofdreamstalk09:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I now see this article is up for deletion, with what appears to be a consensus to merge in to revolutionary wave, so this proposal is redundant. Warofdreamstalk09:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
it should not be deleted or merged. It is a current event with great significance. Considering there is not a strong term for movement yet, the tunisia effect is generally effective at getting the point across until a more proper term can be used; at which point I would redirect this article title to that term and copy/paste the existing article into the new one.99.82.241.118 (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]