Talk:Tupolev Tu-75

Tupolev Tu-75 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 26, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-75/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 16:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Back onto aircraft? I guess I am too. Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 16:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, I did this before the Cup and never bothered to take it to GAN because it wasn't eligible. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. I don't think it's eligible either (see comments below).

Comments
- Too tiny. Waaay too tiny. Stub, in my opinion, except it's sourced (and not very well at that!).
  - Sorry, length is not a consideration. The only valid criteria are the GA-class ones. It's a prototype that never went into production, how many worthwhile sources do you think even mention it?
- Gunston is not in the Notes.
  - Look again. He's sourced for the specification.
- It's Gordon and Rigamant.Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 23:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hi there. I was asked to chip in my two cents on the subject. IMHO, the length of the article is marginal; however there are very few reliable sources for Soviet aircraft, even production ones, yet alone prototypes. Using the book by Yefim Gordon is as good as it gets - in fact, it's probably the only significant RS on the type. A gBooks search for "Tupolev Tu-75" turns up 7 hits - every one of them a printed Wikimirror. These prototypes, especially Soviet, are very hard to find information on. And as noted, length isn't a GA concern, rather whether or not all available information on a subject has been used. (See for instance BGM-75 AICBM - just as short or shorter, but there's nothing at all that can be said further about it...) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The AICBM is longer, the only reason this one looks longer is because of the specs. Disregarding that, do you have any info on what the aircraft was doing with the MAP? Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 21:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is specified in either of my sources, but I expect that it was doing a mix of flight tests and ferrying.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You guys win on the size objection, passed.