Jump to content

Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is this article extended protected?

[edit]

I'm relatively new to wikipedia editing so this is a genuine question, also forgive me if I'm doing this wrong with how I'm creating the talk page question, but why does this article have extended protection? Ramaswamy isn't that notable of a politician compared to someone like J.D. Vance, where their extended protection was turned back into semi-protection, despite being a much more notable politician and larger figurehead for the republican party, so why is extended protection necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Partey Lover (talkcontribs) 22:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I knew. I think the comment with citation 53 is an unnecessary dig stemming from an article with a clear political bias - it's not heavily biased, but it is certainly there if you read it. I am not even going to bother to read the rest of the article because of this. Sad. 2601:985:C01:A80:9936:836A:E9C3:B794 (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

climate change

[edit]

the word "falsely" should be removed as there is debate

"and asserted, falsely, that "more people are dying from climate policies than actual climate change."


https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-change-heat-cold-deaths-medical-journal-health-risk-energy-cost-fossil-fuels-11631741045


https://unherd.com/newsroom/bjorn-lomborg-how-global-warming-will-save-lives/


https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-will-rising-temperatures-mean-more-lives-are-saved-than-lost/


Anvil Jenkins (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's debated but in an earlier thread False Claims wording some editors decided it's okay. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be OK with removing "falsely" to read and asserted , falsely, that "more people are dying from climate policies than actual climate change". It is a hard statement to quantify and fact check. The main point is that Ramaswamy's position is deliberately at odds with the scientific consensus on climate change. This is why he inveighs against locutions such as "climate change agenda" and "climate change policies." (Note that the links posted above are irrelevant.) So I suggest it could be better to elide "falsely" and add a sentence to the effect that Ramaswamy's positions are at odds with the consensus. -- M.boli (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Extended-confirmed-protected edit request

[edit]

The short sentence "Roivant has never been profitable" is out of date and inaccurate, and somewhat a non-sequitur in the context of the paragraph. For example, see https://www.statnews.com/2023/10/23/roche-telavant-roivant/ from some months later.

Slightly more accurate would be that Roivant was not profitable while he was CEO. 148.59.186.35 (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Changed to "During Ramaswamy's time ... had never been profitable." -- M.boli (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Signature

[edit]

Here is his signature. VivekR-Signature-01.svg MediaGuy768 (talk) 04:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://translate.yandex.ru/?text=The%20frame%20is%20with%20you&from=tabbar&source_lang=en&target_lang=ru Ледовских(г.Орёл) (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! But i don't know what you said and I don't open unknown Russian websites. Sorry :) MediaGuy768 (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The frame is with you in slavic languages rama s vami 176.65.96.97 (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Government infobox

[edit]

Given that his position in DOGE is considered “outside the government” by various reliable sources, should we keep the government infobox? 107.115.171.128 (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]