Talk:York City War Memorial/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 22:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Rare that I don't find anything to nitpick on this score! AGF'ing that the British English bits that don't quite seem to flow well are, in fact, artifacts of my own differing dialect. Regardless, nothing stands out as bad or wrong.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Fine.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	No issues.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I prefer more than 1 set of references at the end of a paragraph, but the sources are sufficiently few and the prose well enough integrated that I don't see a need to quibble.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No issues noted.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No issues found with Earwig's tool.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issues noted
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Comprehensive article on a limited topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issues noted.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issues noted.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All in order.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Appropriate.
	7. Overall assessment.	First pass pass, high praise from me.