Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Actinote zikani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actinote zikani

Created by Sir MemeGod (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 12:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC).

  •  Reviewing..., Article is new enough and long enough. The citations need formatting and duplication clean-up immediately, you have the same refs multiple times, and names should not be capscase, among other issues. Also citations should not be in the lede, if something is in the lede, it should be in the body with a citation there. Also beware of peacockery.--Kevmin § 16:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
  • @Sir MemeGod: of initial comments.--Kevmin § 17:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
  • @Kevmin: I have fixed the lede, fixed (most) of the peacockery issues, and there are no duplicate citations as of my last check, 2 minutes ago. Apologies for not getting back sooner, I had COVID and really wasn't in the mood to edit. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 12:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • The fixes are good, I'm going to pause the nom review to see what the GA review outcome is.--Kevmin § 16:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

@Kevmin: GAN passed. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Article GA passed, original nomination was new enough and long enough. I known that the specific 8a.m. time is going to hit problems either in the promotion process here, or on the main page. I would say the more accurate part of that sentence is "at sunrise", that should be corrected to avoid the wp:overprecision of the statement.--Kevmin § 18:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Fixed. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 18:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Actinote zikani mounted pair.
GA nom good to go. No identified copyvios, article cited and sourced per DYK. Sources are confirmed and hook is verified to sourcing. I would suggest including the mounted specimen image for the hook as well, image is main page compliant from Flicker cc-by-0 account of DNA sequenced specimens. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 13:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes, we should use an image if possible, I forgot to add it when starting the nom. SirMemeGod  13:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)