Template talk:Nasdaq-100

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Finance & Investment

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles

United States

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

New format

In its current form, an alphabetical list of the 100 companies is not very readable and web user friendly, nor does it follow WP:CLS. If no one objects, I may have to divide the list via {{navbox generic}} by industry. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it does follow WP:CLS; it is a helpful template ot have on the article page for each Nasdaq 100 co. Also, I don't the cleanup template was appropriate for a template, so I took it off. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What notability problem; who hasn't at least heard of the NASDAQ Index? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]