User:Mbcap/centre

This user is a physician.

Use for deletion of user page or subpage: {{db-u1}}

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

fa-1

دانش فارسی این کاربر در سطح مبتدی است.

ar-1

هذا المستخدم يتحدث اللغة العربية بمستوى مبتدئ.

ur-1

اِس صارِف کو اُردُو زُبان کا اِبتدائی عِلم ہے۔

This user is a bicyclist.

Search user languages

Welcome!

Hello, Mbcap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

How can neutrality be achieved?

Talking with other contributors is a great way to find out why there is a dispute over an article's neutrality. Ideas and POVs can be shared and ultimately the disputed fact or point can be fixed if it is incorrect or, when dealing with a controversial issue, various legitimate sources can be cited in the article.

Historians commonly cite many sources in books because there are and will always be disputes over history. Contributors on Wikipedia can do the same thing, thus giving readers a broad spectrum of POVs and opinions.

Additionally, there are several steps one can take to resolve a NPOV dispute:

Please remember to assume good faith
Politely point out the perceived problem either on the article's talk page or the user's talk page
Consider filing a request for comment
Get a third opinion
File a report at NPOV noticeboard
File a report at Biographies of Living persons noticeboard (if the article features information about living people
File a report at fringe theories noticeboard (if the article covers or features fringe theories)
Other options available to resolve such situations explained at dispute resolution.

Where do I find the page with articles that need improving?

Useful sources

Brill Online - only green box accessable (download relevant articles before access expires, if needed)

Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics - (now in the public domain)

Useful links

Deleting a sub-page

Created pages

Upper limb neurological examination

Documents to learn

Articles needing work:

CAT:NPOV

Urgent attention:

WP:WIKICODE

Articles to improve

Ulcerative Colitis - featured possible
Muhammad Muhsin Khan
Split time line in Al-Shabaab (militant group) - timeline is 35-45% of the page length

WikiProject Medicine/Gastroenterology task force

Project seems possibly abandoned - re-incarnate (WP:GI)

Only two featured articles and 3 are good out of 109 articles (shocking) - needs immediate attention

Ulcerative Colitis

Aritcle failed GA assessment for these reasons.^[1] - OTOM

Address latest cannabis research for remission (no THC strain)

Address Tag issue; reference and layman language needed

Rectal discharge

Needs total rewrite

Pharmacological torture

Address mefloquinine use at Gitmo

Umm Kulthum bint Ali

Learn WP:BIO and assess notability

Protect page possible? Constant Vandalism

Ali

Major POV issue

Takri

Needs content (scholarly view for and against if possible)

Check sources for reliability

Is letter photo needed?

Terrorism related articles

Looks through most notable in terrorism portal^[2] & scan for POV issues (Some articles very prop-american and others pro-islamist)

Al-Qaeda portal^[3] in shabby state (delete? if not being maintained or serving purpose) - look at discussion for ISIL portal for help^[4]

Enquire about creating an islamist org portal? - Will help group together terrorism and islamist organistations (e.g. HT, JI, AQ, ISIL, Boko Haram, Shabab, Taliban etc) and also avoid use of non-neutral word (see Shauer & Scahill)

Ibn Hizam

Assess notability and if pass --> add content: Islamic contract law (look at g.scholar)

People reported to be born in the Kaaba

Useless article - ascertain notability in view of deletion, otherwise just clean up

Articles with serious concerns

Hadih of the pond of Khumm - use public domain encyclopedia and brill online to clean up this joke

Al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya - Good article but false claim about respect among sunni scholars. Uses partisan sources to back up claim and non-notable sunni scholars.