User talk:רסטיניאק

This user has a second user page, with an English user name: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rastiniak

Welcome!

Hello, רסטיניאק, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rastiniak, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rastiniak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use one account

Hello -- I notice that the talk page for Amiram Goldblum was edited yesterday by User:Rastiniak. I assume this is you. You should be aware of WP:SOCK -- and the gist of it is that you must not use two different accounts, certainly not without acknowledging that they are both yours. I'm not sure why you created the new one; in any event, I strongly advise you to use only one from this point on. If you continue to use both, it is likely that both of them will end up blocked -- one permanently, the other temporarily. I'm posting here in the mode of constructive advice, in part to prevent a situation where someone else posts in a more hostile mode. Regards, —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nomoskedasticity,this may be a result of inexperience and not of any bad intentions, I can assure you of that. Trouble is that I see on the top of my page the same name (Rastiniak) in Hebrew, but while I write something in Wikipedia in English I naturally use the 4 tildes with the English name. They are the same....how could I guarantee that only the English name will appear ? or should it not ? I am indeed confused and will be glad to

get advise from you, sorry for taking your time... רסטיניאק (talk) 19:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)rastiniak[reply]

The main thing is, stay logged in to just one account, especially if using multiple devices/computers. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean that if I move between computers (office and home, usually) I should log in in both to the same account ? רסטיניאק (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)rastiniak[reply]

Yes, exactly. There won't be any problems in doing this -- use the same (one) account on any device (computer) you use to edit Wikipedia. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a good identify to cross identify accounts; I've done that for you at User:Rastiniak but you can edit that however you want; a list of templates for doing this is at Category:Alternative Wikipedia account templates NE Ent 13:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you NE Ent, I have by now abandoned any editing through User:Rastiniak and regard it closed for any future edits. רסטיניאק (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

rastiniak multiple accounts needs to be corrected

rastiniak has two accounts, one in english and one in hebrew. i now see that he has been investigated for sock puppetry. i propose that one of the accounts be deleted (makes no difference which), but that all material from that account's talk page be moved to the remaining account's talk page. (i assume that both are his and not a real sock puppet, yes?)

relevant pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rastiniak/Archive

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D7%A8%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%90%D7%A7

rastiniak - you have first right to take care of this. please proceed. thanks. Soosim (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That SPI was closed with no action. The only thing this editor needs to do at this stage is to use only one account going forward. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rastiniak may not be familiar with the relevant policy, WP:Multiple accounts, which recommends the use of only one account without good reason. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nomoskedasticity and Malik Shabazz. I am now familiar with the policy but did not realize that I am still using two different accounts. I can see only the Hebrew login name (rastiniak in Hebrew...) on my page either at the office or at home. Please indicate to me if that is OK. I am not interested in using any other as long as I have a keyboard with Hebrew. What do you suggest that I do once I am travelling and have no such access to Hebrew ? רסטיניאק (talk) 15:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)rastiniak[reply]

It looks like you can type in English even with a Hebrew log in name, would it be possible to simply only use the Rastiniak account and abandon this account? (X! · talk) · @728 · 16:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

now I am even more confused.... I AM using the rastiniak (in Hebrew) account right now. What would it mean to "abandon" the other account ? what account ? The one in English ? what happens if I abandon it... to issues that were written by using that name (again, similar in Hebrew and in English, so there is not attempt for sock puppetry... I admit that they are both mine...)רסטיניאק (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)rastiniak[reply]

Don't ever use the other account again. Ever. When you abandon it you do nothing, ergo abandon. You never log into that account again. You can follow this link to learn more and although it isn't used much you can also put this template on the old user page.

What do you suggest that I do once I am travelling and have no such access to Hebrew ? Do NOT edit Wikipedia do something else with your time.
Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 17:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest revert on Goldblum is fine. But please make sure you understand WP:1RR for that article. If you revert on that more than once in a 24-hour period, someone will likely ask that you be blocked, and that request would likely be successful (though in the first instance it would only be for ~24 hours). —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nomoskedasticity . I assume that the same applies to Soosim. In any case, there is some chance to get a scan of the original pages. If so, how does one proceed ? Could that dispute with Soosim be terminated otherwise ?רסטיניאק (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Yes, it does indeed apply to Soosim (and in fact he has already been blocked a couple of times for violating it). A scan might help resolve things with Soosim. You could upload a scan to "commons" -- but I don't really know how to do that. You'd have to investigate at WP:COMMONS. It's up to you, how much effort you would want to put into that. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I request to protect this page against the serial vandalizer רסטיניאק (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

{{adminhelp}} As the article Amiram Goldblum is now fully protected for 10 days based on my request, there remains a paragraph with defamatory information introduced by Soosim which has no basis in the source that he cites. As I wrote in two comments at the bottom of Talk:Amiram Goldblum (section LA Times article which includes info about Goldblum) the Soosim edited paragraph (second paragraph of the Politics section) is an imaginative synthesis of isolated facts from the article, written in order to harm Goldblum. It does not conform with WP:BLP on views of tiny minorities. Also, on the talk page, contrary to what is suggested in WP:BLP, there is a full section introduced by Nataev (who has been blocked from editing that page) claiming that the Goldblum article is an autobiography, without presenting any false or distorted or non cited information and without suggesting any missing new information. Nataev admitted to be a rival of Goldblum by his association with the main smearer of Golbdlum on a personal website, Professor Steven Plaut. Also, the autobiography claim is rediculous in view of the fact that it is Soosim himself who started that article while I have tried to balance it subsequently (in part by having mistakingly a second login with the name Rastiniak, which is English for my Hebrew username, the only one I use since I was alerted about it..) by correct and non-defamatory information, which was why Soosim started it.רסטיניאק (talk) 08:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Just to add my support for the suggestion that this addition to the article should be reversed, and added back only once there is consensus for it on the article talk page. In this instance, WP:BLPREMOVE really needs to take precedence over WP:WRONGVERSION. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I suggest you posting your request on the talk page of the article in a section under a {{Edit protected}} tag. Technical 13 (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Technical 13 is correct - this request has to be made on the article talk page as a "edit protected" request. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Technical 13 and Ronhjones for that comment. On the article's talk page, however, an administrator suggested to use the {{Edit protected}} tag only if the different editors can reach consensus, which has not occured until now and will not be possible as long as ][User:Soosim|Soosim]] sticks to a defamatory interpretation of texts. In that case, is it still recommended to move the request to the article's talk page. Sorry for my lack of experience.. רסטיניאק (talk) 05:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

i have tried to leave comments here, but the editor has removed them. and from the article talk page. what can we do? Soosim (talk) 06:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soosim is requested to leave his comments on his own page. None of his comments has been deleted from the article's talk page, but they will be delted here if harmful רסטיניאק (talk) 07:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

this looks like erasing comments from an article talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAmiram_Goldblum&diff=555024070&oldid=555019836 - yes? no? Soosim (talk) 07:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, non-registered authors (as well as registered ones) who introduce defamatory and hatred messages are required to be deleted immediatley. This is one of the basics of WP:BLP. Could it be a sockpuppet of the author who protests ? רסטיניאק (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Apparently you two have a content dispute. I'm assuming that you've already requested a WP:3O and the next rational step for you would be to try and figure it out at the dispute resolution noticeboard. I wish you the best of luck in coming to an agreement; unfortunately, no-one is going to edit the article for either one of you until the dispute has been resolved. Happy editing! Technical 13 (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:FULL - Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting consensus Consensus is a fundamental part of Wikipedia policy Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:PREFER, content that is "defamatory of living persons" needs to be removed even in the absence of consensus. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redacting your contributions to talk pages

Once someone has responded to a comment you make at an article talk page, you can't delete it, per WP:REDACT. However, to show that you withdraw a comment that you regret making, you can "strike" it, placing the following code at the beginning and end: < s> and < /s> -- but omit the spaces, so that you get ~~this~~. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 04:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nomo, will perform soon. רסטיניאק (talk) 09:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

Please self-revert your ad hominem and discriminatory edit on COIN

Your last edit on WP:COIN is a clear violation of WP:NPA. Not to mention that the suggestion that one's (alleged) religious observance reflects a particular political perspective is highly offensive. Please self-revert. Scarletfire2112 (talk) 07:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The whole of your and of Soosim's edits are personal attacks on Goldblum. Not to mention the additional sockpuppets who follow you just like puppies follow their moms. You are free to take that issue to any discussion, as long as you can be stopped from vilifying and smearing. Unfortunately, the connection between orthodox religious views and extreme right wing politics in Israel is clear and well known. Many of us on the left have been verbally and physically attacked by those people, and as you well know and have been directly involved in the recent discussion on the LAT information about Goldblum, the main focus of the discussion with you guys was the attribution of the violence to the extreme right wing religious fanatics. רסטיניאק (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

May 2013

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Elie Wiesel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. At [1] you wrote that "Wiesel expressed anti-muslim opinions", whereas the cited source makes no such assessment of the opinions expressed by Wiesel. Sandstein 21:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sandstein,thanks for your comments. I realize that I exaggerated my characterization of the words of Elie Wiesel. So I ask for your help now. Prof. Wiesel chairs the Ir David foundation which is committed to the "Judaization" of the village of Silwan (inhabited by more than 50,00 Muslim Palestinians) and his words about the appearance of "Jerusalem" in the Bible vis-a-vis the Kor'an (while it is well known to all that Jerusalem is the 3rd most sacred city to Muslims) does raise a question about Wiesel's opinions about Muslims. Would it be OK to raise that question on the talk page of the article ? I should not have inserted it to the article, but am glad that the issue of his chairing the Ir David Foundation is accepted.רסטיניאק (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Arbitration enforcement warning: WP:ARBPIA

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

This warning concerns your generally aggressive style of editing in this topic area, particularly with regard to WP:BLP (see the warning above) and your general pattern of editing in which you appear to favor the position of only one side in the conflict; such behavior, taken as a whole, violates WP:NPOV. If you continue to edit in this vein, you will likely be prohibited from editing anything in this topic area. Sandstein 21:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Sandstein, I assume that when you wrote "you appear to favor the position of only one side in the conflict" you meant that my opinions are opposed to those of the right wing in Israel. That may be correct although on many issues I find myself siding with the right wing than with many on the left. I regard myself as left wing Zionist, which I have always been and probably will not change...Even though I clearly favor one side, I strictly follow WP guidelines in my edits of articles (see |Amir Peretz, and |Yair Lapid and |Anonymous and |Jewish underground and requests for citations on the Steven Plaut article. Where is the aggressive style ? If you do not find it, please consider erasing that accusation. Thanks. רסטיניאק (talk) 22:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michal Rovner.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SL93 (talk) 04:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Michal Rovner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SL93 (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, רסטיניאק. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kach. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner article

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Arbpia rules mean you need tenure and minimum number of edits (500) in order to edit pages related to the Israel Palestine conflict- so you can't edit that article yet. Thank you for your attention. Kenosha Forever (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]