User talk:1618033golden

Welcome!

Hello, 1618033golden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Stupid Lake. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Largoplazo (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome, User:Largoplazo! I'm excited to be a part of Wikipedia, and can't wait to start editing! I am checking out the links you gave me. 1618033golden (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi 1618033golden! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:27, Thursday, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Original research

Hi. I have reverted your last edit to List of Google Easter eggs since it constituted Original Research. If you can find a reliable reference to support your claim (in the edit summary) that "it still works", please feel free to edit the page appropriately. Thanks Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 00:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to find a reliable source for the egg. Thanks for letting me know. 1618033golden_c0ntr1b5 12:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sources are simply announcements or notices, notability cannot be inherited from others and this is currently not significant enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:1618033golden/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Potamotrygon orbignyi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Potamotrygon orbignyi, 1618033golden!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great. There are articles on it in Wikispecies and a few other languages, so I've linked to them and put a tag on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 21:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

I don't know what trouted means, but... I think it's not being biased to say that Athill has worked with some of the greatest writers of the last century. Kerouac, Mailer, de Beauvoir, Naipaul, Roth, Updike, and Rhys are unqualifiedly "some" of the greatest writers of that century (not all or most or simply "the greatest"). I disagree with your deletion and will be reediting the page, which you might then delete again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.176.9.254 (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK... but that's still against NPOV. Perhaps use a less biased adjective, such as "influential"? 1.6180339887 golden^{sqᴉɹʇuoɔ} 20:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Please stop reverting my edits to Ultrasuede - they aren't vandalism 2620:0:1000:1811:11E4:7374:BDE6:5BEC (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the page more closely now, and I guess it's not vandalism. Sorry! (That was a great time to trout me :P) Feel free to remove the warnings I put on your talk page, since they're now irrelevant. 1.618033 golden^{sqᴉɹʇuoɔ} 19:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baclofen

Hello, About Baclofen edit - the current description of the picture is wrong. It shows a Polish made Baclofen tablets pack, made by Polish Polpharma company, for export to Russia. Saying that it is Russian Baclofen is just not true. If this is not constructive then once again it is proven that wikipedia is not a reliable source of information, with topics edited by ignorants. Pitty. I will not contribute anymore to this topic. Not worth it. All the best Lukas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:18D:7000:BC36:B0F6:5885:3821 (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question about removing content that is detrimental to organization's public affairs and sister organizations

Hello,

I work for a institution(Pillar College) that used to be apart of Pillar of Fire in Zarephath, New Jersey and this KKK association with Pillar of Fire happened 100 years ago and the current members have disassociated themselves to the founders beliefs and connections with the KKK. Is there anyway to remove the information concerning the KKK on the following wiki sites?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zarephath,_New_Jersey

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillar_of_Fire_International

And can you please change the title of the link to Somerset Christian College to Pillar College? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somerset_Christian_College

Thank you

Tim

Thanks for letting me know. Wikipedia is a neutral entity and does not take sides with anyone; it only reports facts, so don't worry about any information that seems detrimental. Your edits were warranted and not any form of vandalism, so I apologize for reverting them. However, it would be helpful to leave an edit summary explaining why you made your edits. I'll look over at your requests, but I do not have time to fulfill them now. Thanks, Phi - 1.618033 golden^{sqᴉɹʇuoɔ} 15:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aliidiomarina has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aliidiomarina. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aliidiomarina has been accepted

Aliidiomarina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:1618033golden/sandbox/Wadsworth Constant

Hello, 1618033golden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Wadsworth Constant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 00:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 1618033golden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I've continuously been adding the date "January 2017" to articles everywhere. You're one of the many who have had to fix it. Thank you so much. Pardon my embarrassing mistake. 😂 -- AlexanderHovanec (talk)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1618033golden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1618033golden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello 1618033golden, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Invitation to project revival

Dear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 16:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Frequency Actuated Rectal Tremor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frequency Actuated Rectal Tremor. Since you had some involvement with the Frequency Actuated Rectal Tremor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]