User talk:46.198.138.49

January 2018

Hello, I'm Gatemansgc. I noticed that you recently removed content from Turkish coffee without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 09:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Turkish coffee, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GS ⋙ ☎ 01:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:46.198.138.49 reported by User:Dan Koehl (Result: ). Thank you. Dan Koehl (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Turkish coffee. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not blank adequately sourced content without consensus! besieged^talk 20:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish coffee. besieged^talk 03:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:46.198.138.49 reported by User:Besieged (Result: ). Thank you. besieged^talk 13:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

"Greek" Turkish Coffee

I have opened a discussion on the Turkish coffee talk page here regarding your edits, and encourage you to work with the article's other editors to improve the article according to Wikipedia's guidelines such as neutral point of view, style and formatting, no original research, citing sources, not including the full text of primary sources, verifiability, conflict of interest issues and sourcing, to name a few of the more relevant ones. The content you are contesting is well sourced, and thus should not be removed wholesale - I understand you have a different viewpoint, but rather than simply removing content that does not agree with your point of view, you should instead identify other content from reliable sources that contests that which is currently asserted, discuss it on the article's talk page linked above to achieve a consensus, and work with other editors to ensure that it is added in a way that is appropriate. Otherwise, you'll only see your removal of said content reverted time and time again, and your account(s) blocked from editing for edit warring and/or vandalism, which not only will not help your cause, but it does not help the Wikipedia be the best that it can be, and we're all better served by working together. besieged^talk 16:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

---