User talk:AGAR2EM1
AGAR2EM1, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi AGAR2EM1!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
|
March 2014
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Air (classical element) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —Machine Elf 1735 14:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SpinningSpark 21:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
AGAR2EM1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Edit Warring Started by 2nd Party; I was recently blocked after editing information...and putting in RELIABLE SOURCES...by another user abusing the system, constantly undoing changes that I made. Must I take legal action against Wikipedia? User:Spinningspark Please note that the reversion of edits has occurred greater than 24 hours apart. The User:Machine_Elf_1735 has consistently reverted my honest edits, and frankly it's pissing me off. I am sick of every time I sign up to Wikipedia getting blocked by some fool who refuses to accept new information. I have the ability to make a new account and use a blocked IP address that you cannot touch. If you know what is good for you, you will unblock my editing capabilities. If I am to be blocked for this, then I DEMAND that User:Machine_Elf_1735 also be blocked. This user started an Edit War and is dishonest as well as accusatory. To answer your question User:Bishonen, I am the VICTIM of an edit war, not the perpetrator. Thank you!
Decline reason:
Irrespective of the merits of your case, a threat of legal action absolutely precludes an unblock; and threats and insults do not help. Before an unblock can be considered you will need to make an unconditional agreement that you will not attempt or threaten any legal action against Wikipedia or any of its editors or employees in respect of any action undertaken by them within the context of the Wikipedia project. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AGAR2EM1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Edit Warring Started by 2nd Party; I was recently blocked after editing information...and putting in RELIABLE SOURCES...by another user abusing the system, constantly undoing changes that I made. Must I take legal action against Wikipedia? User:SpinningSpark Please note that the reversion of edits has occurred greater than 24 hours apart. The User:Machine_Elf_1735 has consistently reverted my honest edits, and frankly it's pissing me off. I am sick of every time I sign up to Wikipedia getting blocked by some fool who refuses to accept new information. I have the ability to make a new account and use a blocked IP address that you cannot touch. If you know what is good for you, you will unblock my editing capabilities. If I am to be blocked for this, then I DEMAND that User:Machine_Elf_1735 also be blocked. This user started an Edit War and is dishonest as well as accusatory. To answer your question User:Bishonen, I am the VICTIM of an edit war, not the perpetrator. Thank you!
User:Ohnoitsjamie I'll also be bringing your name up in my reports. I have never in my entire life (online or in real life) been treated with the utter disrespect, bias, and blatant hostility that Wikipedia administrators and personnel have given me! I do not know if Wikipedia chooses the most vile people with the worst attitudes to edit their articles, but I can tell you on thing right now...and that is that Wikipedia is in no way able to be edited freely like its claim. Foolish, arrogant pricks seem to have the "in" on this website and are "trolling" to a point of no return. Is it any wonder that every year Wikipedia asks for more money--NO! Why? Because people like these poor excuses for "admins" (yes, this is YOU User:Ohnoitsjamie, yes this is YOU, User:SpinningSpark) that have the audacity to block someone from honest editing because another User:Machine_Elf_1735 decided it would be cool to completely screw up someone's reliable edit and then whenever said person (ME) was not too happy about it, it's my tough luck. I'm seriously getting sick of this community...learn to respect people and quit being so arrogant. User:Ohnoitsjamie how about you get your facts straight before you start spouting off at the mouth about how wrong *I* am; all I did was attempt to do what ANYONE is supposed to be able to do...edit this website with reliable sources. What really takes the cake is how that these other "admins" break their own rules (such as the "Edit Warring" rules) yet get away with it no problem... AGAR2EM1 (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First off, WP:NOTTHEM. Secondly: What do you mean "every I time I sign up to Wikipedia" you get blocked? What are your other accounts? At any rate, you've just admitted block evasion, so, no. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AGAR2EM1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Edit Warring Started by 2nd Party; I was recently blocked after editing information...and putting in RELIABLE SOURCES...by another user abusing the system, constantly undoing changes that I made. Must I take legal action against Wikipedia? User:SpinningSpark Please note that the reversion of edits has occurred greater than 24 hours apart. The User:Machine_Elf_1735 has consistently reverted my honest edits, and frankly it's pissing me off. I am sick of every time I sign up to Wikipedia getting blocked by some fool who refuses to accept new information. I have the ability to make a new account and use a blocked IP address that you cannot touch. If you know what is good for you, you will unblock my editing capabilities. If I am to be blocked for this, then I DEMAND that User:Machine_Elf_1735 also be blocked. This user started an Edit War and is dishonest as well as accusatory. To answer your question User:Bishonen, I am the VICTIM of an edit war, not the perpetrator. Thank you!
User:Ohnoitsjamie I'll also be bringing your name up in my reports. I have never in my entire life (online or in real life) been treated with the utter disrespect, bias, and blatant hostility that Wikipedia administrators and personnel have given me! I do not know if Wikipedia chooses the most vile people with the worst attitudes to edit their articles, but I can tell you on thing right now...and that is that Wikipedia is in no way able to be edited freely like its claim. Foolish, arrogant pricks seem to have the "in" on this website and are "trolling" to a point of no return. Is it any wonder that every year Wikipedia asks for more money--NO! Why? Because people like these poor excuses for "admins" (yes, this is YOU User:Ohnoitsjamie, yes this is YOU, User:SpinningSpark) that have the audacity to block someone from honest editing because another User:Machine_Elf_1735 decided it would be cool to completely screw up someone's reliable edit and then whenever said person (ME) was not too happy about it, it's my tough luck. I'm seriously getting sick of this community...learn to respect people and quit being so arrogant. User:Ohnoitsjamie how about you get your facts straight before you start spouting off at the mouth about how wrong *I* am; all I did was attempt to do what ANYONE is supposed to be able to do...edit this website with reliable sources. What really takes the cake is how that these other "admins" break their own rules (such as the "Edit Warring" rules) yet get away with it no problem...
--jpgordon, see the problem I have is this: I DID NOT DO ANYTHING WRONG ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA'S GUIDELINES WHICH EXPLICITLY STATE THAT EDITING AN ARTICLE WITH RELIABLE RESOURCES IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE! Am I to stand idly by as my hard work is flushed down the toilet?!?! I THINK NOT!!! As for the 2nd part...Wikipedia has been around for years now...I do not remember my other accounts...why else would I make a new account? Anyway, I've already sent in a mail to the Contact Us people in hopes that I can be met with something other than hostility! --jpgordon do you realize that you're LITERALLY the first person on here to NOT be hostile to me? I mean that's pretty sad, but thank you for your civility! AGAR2EM1
Decline reason:
This block notice and the comments below are enough to justify an indefinite block, even without considering your earlier history. Personal attacks, legal threats, threat to use sockpuppets, etc etc ... The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment to reviewing admin This is actually this user's third unblock request, as the user has deleted the previous two responses. A look at the user's article space contributions should tell you all you need to know. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- AGAR2EM1: If you remove my comments again, your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment to User:Ohnoitsjamie Your comment was removed due to the fact that it is not necessary and displays personal hostility. I do not know who you are or why you are so hostile to someone such as myself, but that WILL stop; there's just no two ways about it. Fix your attitude please. Though I have been around Wikipedia for, I can guarantee, just as long or longer than you, I have not had many accounts over the years. I decided to try my hand at editing and wanted to start out with something small, easy, and reliable...and then I get the most hostile outburst from any community I have ever seen! The admin who intially blocked me had the audacity to personally insult me saying that what I put was "blatant nonsense"...and I do NOT appreciate this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Rolling_archive look under "Air (classical element)")! This community is legitimately more hostile than that of Call of Duty, League of Legends, Ice Hockey, Heroes of Newearth or anything else! I do not know if it is "that time of the month" for you, or what...just what exactly...you have against me, but as previously stated, I have already sent in an email to the Contact Us at Wikipedia. I apologize, but I do not have time for your trivial games and random abuses of power. You wanna troll me? Well I can "troll" you too...PLEASE NOTE, ANYONE WHO IS READING THIS, USER:Ohnoitsjamie IS A SCAMMER AND DISHONEST AS WELL AS BIASED BASED ON HER OWN BLOG AND WIKIPEDIA PAGE I will be looking forward to whenever you are properly removed from a position that requires responsibility...as you obviously display none due to your open hostility to someone you do not even know or have anything to do with. Out of everyone here, you have the LEAST say in this matter. Go ahead and block me...I swear that I will be back on Wikipedia and I will hide my IP address so that you abusive administrators cannot block me for doing what is allowed by Wikipedia. If you deserved the badge of administrator, then you would NOT INSTANTLY pick sides in a situation like this...do you even know what happened?! Seriously, stop abusing your power and help out...just remember the more hostile you get with me, the more information I have to tell your superiors. This reminds me of going into a store and having a problem with both the employee and the manager; so you must take it to a higher up overseer. Good day to you.
- Your talk page access has been revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)