User talk:Abhishek Prajeeb

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 21:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Republic TV seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko It is already given down that they are accused of right wing supporting, writing news channel is right wing will lose its genuineness and neutrality. Abhishek Prajeeb (talk) 20:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That they are right-wing is well-sourced. Removing that fact would not be a wp:neutral point of view. Try Googling "Republic TV" "right wing" (keep in quotes). You will find hits from many wp:reliable sources. If you think it should be removed, please follow wp:BRD. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annexation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 20:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner Please change your one side approach in this edit. Your edit clearly pro-Portugese. Abhishek Prajeeb (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for showing so clearly your pro-Indian Point of View. But fact is that Wikipedia is neutral, not pro-Portugese and not pro-Indian. The Banner talk 21:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner OK agreed, but your statement "Invasion" is completely Pro-Portugese. If you are following neutral of view, then change "Invasion" to "Annexation". The Portugese usually refer this incident as Invasion of Goa". If you are continuing writing this then I will keep writing our point of view. Abhishek Prajeeb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but multiple move discussions on the talk page did not end with a clear consensus to move the article to another title. And as the title and the content - so to say - must speak the same language, you can not have content that says something else than the title. But you are free to start a third move discussion. The Banner talk 21:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And please keep the warning on the top of this page in mind. Ending up with a block due to active sanctions from the ArbCom would be a sad development. The Banner talk 22:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Annexation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 23:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]