User talk:Apswikicontrib

Welcome!

Hello Apswikicontrib! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 06:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 06:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aarti Gupta Bhadauria (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aarti Gupta Bhadauria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary, thanks for the hints for improving the article. As I am new to wiki so didn't know much details hence also posted on your talk page. I also posted for help on article creation helpdesk and got few insights, I'll try to improve accordingly. Apswikicontrib (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apswikicontrib! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ruth Killoran.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Killoran.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ruth Killoran.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Killoran.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aarti Gupta Bhadauria (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is good chance that this artist is notable. She got a full length coverage on The Hindu. Find more sources like that to establish notability.

Some statements are opinions and need to be attributed in-line to people

For example claims like this: One can see her hand into her sculptures without seeing her name

Should be changed to something along the lines of

This person said "One can see her hand into her sculptures without seeing her name"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aarti Gupta Bhadauria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ca, thank you so much for the inputs, I will try to improve it accordingly.Apswikicontrib (talk) Apswikicontrib (talk) 17:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Killoran (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough significant coverage listed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth Killoran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruth Killoran

Hello, Apswikicontrib. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth Killoran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aarti Gupta Bhadauria

Hello, Apswikicontrib. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aarti Gupta Bhadauria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know @Explicit Apswikicontrib (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth Killoran

Hello, Apswikicontrib. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruth Killoran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion about Sublime Galleria

Hello User:Jimfbleak, good evening. I see you have deleted the article I submitted Sublime Galleria, actually I wanted to submit it for review and I think I forgot the steps and by mistake it directly got submitted. Please suggest how can I proceed to get it reviewed? Thanks! Apswikicontrib (talk) Apswikicontrib (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

It never got as far as being submitted because another editor tagged it as blatant spam and I deleted it on that basis. It's full of promotional terms and opinions. premier art gallery... one among the top art galleries in Bangalore,... the vision of promoting fine and performing arts in India... notable events... that attracts artists and art lovers from around the world... providing impactful mentoring for artists, fostering creativity and growth in their artistic journey

You must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your sources were mainly press releases, sites affiliated to the gallery or interviews with the founders. We need independent third-party sources.

There's little evidence that meets notability guidelines. The primary criteria have five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your text is all about what the company sells, little about the company organisation itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits.

If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest. If you work directly or indirectly for the gallery, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. You are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Apswikicontrib. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Apswikicontrib|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the detailed information Jimfbleak, I will keep your hints in mind while submitting the article. I am actually not related to Sublime Galleria directly/indirectly. I am just learning to work with wiki and make some contributions, though not succeeded so far but I'll keep on trying and improving. Apswikicontrib (talk)Apswikicontrib (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]