User talk:CardinalDan

Hello, CardinalDan. You have new messages at Zodiac's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{umbox}} template.

North Korea

It is not a story book thing, it could be true. stop changing it!! The spesh man 1 August 2009 at 16:26. (UTC) I swear i am not!!

need a help

hi ...

       i wrote a new topic on a person(marko calasan) who is the youngest person to get the microsoft system administrator certificate.... i'm a newbie to wikipedia.. so let me know how to explore myself into these wikipedia.. i do like to post some interesting stuffs that i need everyone to know about....it will be my pleasure if u edit my new article with ur kind opinion....

Packers Plus Energy Services

Hello!

I've been trying to write a page for Packers Plus but the disclamier for it sounding like an advertisement is still on the page. I've edited it a few times but the disclaimer is still up. Could you maybe tell me how to rewrite it to make it not sound like an advertisement? Thank you!

For vigilance...

N5iln has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Clarification on References to Fellowdiv.org

Please note that references to Fellowdiv.org is not at all as a source for "medical research". It is used as a reference to evidence what that organization "believe". For example, a citation to the website of a "flat earth society" which claims that they are consistent with science is not at all used a source for agreeing or disagreeing with their belief, or to support or disprove whether the earth is flat, but is rather a that factual reference to the reality that such kind of a group exists, and that their "belief"(!) is that they are "scientific". Anyone is welcome to cite facts to show that such group has an irrational belief and incorrect understanding of science, but that is an entirely different issue from that fact such a group does belief what they do believe. After all, that sort of a group is a "religion", not a science. The existence of "niche religions" is clearly a significant and relevant trend. It is significant enough that the New York Times has an article on it. Just because one may agree or disagree with it, it does not mean that the fact of its existence should be censored. The New York Times clearly took the approach of covering the existence of such religions even though the tone of the article is highly skeptical of their merit. Wikipedia should do no less.

WikiProject Notre Dame Invite

Hey! I noticed you are a Notre Dame alumnus, hence I wanted to invite you to join our project.