User talk:Cro..Scream

Welcome!

Hello, Cro..Scream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 16:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Bacon

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Mikker ^... 19:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rock portal

Thanks for contributing to the talk page, but sign with fou tildes,these squiggly things ~ next time. --Osbus 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Donahue's AfD

You seem to be getting a little worked up about Aaron Donahue's AfD. Don't take it personally. The comments regarding the article are not directed at you. You might want to chill out; is it really worth making a fuss? --JerryOrr 15:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After looking through the history for the AfD, there is some pretty strong evidence that you may be using sockpuppets. This is a blockable offense. If in fact you are using sockpuppets, I recommend that you cease this behavior. If I see more evidence that you may be using sockputters, I will report you to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. --JerryOrr 18:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Donahue

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. --Madchester 20:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Madchester 20:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against Disruption. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

I have the right too put anything i want on my userpage.

No, you don't. Only that information which is useful towards building an encyclopedia. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i would love to respond but seeing that User:Madchester, prevented me from posting and has banned me from using my userspace. do you think its becoming of a admin to write HOMO on my userpage and then ban me from changing it User:Cro..Scream this has nothing to do with me deleting and recreating articles this has everything to do with this users hatred against my ideology.

If you review the edit history to your user page, some other user had already written "HOMO" on it. I simply reverted it to an earlier version that wasn't hosting a mirror of the deleted Donahue article. --Madchester 05:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i have more then enough reason to believe you wrote that on a different computer to make it appear someone else did it. i will report you.

To whom? WP:AGF. User:Zoe|^(talk) 16:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you would like the article to be restored, then put it through Wikipedia:Deletion review. Otherwise, restoring deleted content onto the article's talk page is considered vandalism. --Madchester 05:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Luciferan Order

Hi there. Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article [[{{{1}}}]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:{{{1}}}]]. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

A comment

Your arguments in favour of certain articles are somewhat weakend by your edit history, which includes much vandalism, tendentious editing, a few apparent hoaxes and some other things that Wikipedia is not. Just zis Guy you know? 22:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless some established Wikipedia editors/users vote in favour of keeping your articles, administrators usually give less weight to new users who have opened accounts just to vote in Articles for Deletion polls. When admins see Keep votes flooded by ghost accounts and sock puppets, they're more likely to close the polls and delete the articles. --Madchester 05:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You are suspected of using sockpuppets to influence deletion debates. This is unacceptable. If you are using multiple accounts, please desist immediately. Just zis Guy you know? 12:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that repeated re-insertion of content relating to Aaron Donahue is vandalism. Just zis Guy you know? 17:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that deliberate creation of hoax articles will get you blocked immediately. I suggest you not do that again. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

Please don't add people to categories unless there is clear evidence that they belong in those categories. For example, J.R.R. Tolkien was a Roman Catholic and not a Thelemite. Falsely adding him to the category of Thelemites is vandalism; if you continue to add deliberately incorrect information to Wikipedia articles you may be blocked from editing. THnaks, Gwernol 10:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Spoonie

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pop music, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 10:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contribution to the Wikipedia article Jack Spoonie is very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in Jack Spoonie? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits this article. Thanks! --Calton | Talk 05:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Spoonie and Georgie Dimitrov (Fantasy Writer)

These articles have been nominated for deletion discussion. Please feel free to join in the discussions linked from the pages Bwithh 04:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These articles have now been speedy deleted as hoaxes Bwithh 12:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]