Jump to content

User talk:Dairb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Dairb, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Motion Impossible (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 14:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dairb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 14:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Motion Impossible (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Motion Impossible (December 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This didn't need more sources; it needed better quality sources that provide independent in-depth coverage. Given those likely do not exist, it cannot meet the notability guidelines.
S0091 (talk) 19:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Motion Impossible

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Dairb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Motion Impossible, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Motion Impossible

[edit]

Hello, Dairb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Motion Impossible".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motion Impossible moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Motion Impossible. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and this should get reviewed first. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do we resolve the potential conflict of interest? Isn’t the draft article written in a neutral style with no opinion? 79.77.18.181 (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COI is about the person writing the article, not how the article is written. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is what I thought, but I also read that if there is a conflict of interest there are exceptions if the writting style is neutral and not tring to sell or promote. I am the CTO at Motion Impossible just for your reference. I fully understand the COI policy, but what is the recommended way to get around this when I writing the content? If I approach a 3rd party, I will be providing them with the same content to some degree. Fundametally, the company has been in business for 10 years and works with many industry leaders and there is a justification in having more information about the company and products. We have partnerships with ARRI and other industry leading companies. Also, the technolgy is an evolution of the camera dolly platform which already has a page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camera_dolly. Which by the way is missing some key information about industry standard dolly systems. The page I edited is based from the ARRI page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arri Dairb (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See 331dot's information below. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You approaching a third party would only transfer the conflict of interest to them. 331dot (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Motion Impossible (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Dairb. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dairb. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dairb|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dairb (talk) 13:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 331dot (talk) 13:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please also see your help desk discussion regarding the image. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I now see above that you are the CTO- that makes you a paid editor. 331dot (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dairb&oldid=1262449114"