User talk:Darius Dhlomo

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darius Dhlomo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked now since August 31, 2010. The very vast majority of my contributions are no copyright violations, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo. As I pointed out earlier before (see the history of my talk page) I did made a few errors in the past, but never intentionally to harm the project. No one has to doubt: I did learn my lesson after this block (and reading the rage-and-anger-comments posted earlier on). Caution will be my second name. Regards, Darius Dhlomo (talk) 10:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am sorry: the fact that you believe that you only "made a few errors in the past" is the most disturbing thing I have seen. We have hundreds of clear copyright violations that have taken an awful lot of person-hours to identify and fix. Your unblock request demeans their work. I'm not even sure that you were ever even up for WP:OFFER. Indeed, based on the publicity and overall damage, I would suggest that your only road to appeal is directly to WP:ArbCom (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that this issue was discussed extensively on the admin noticeboards at the time I think any unblock should be discussed at WP:AN prior to taking action. Hut 8.5 08:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enough. Hey Mid (contribs) 16:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-I have been led to this page because I found an article which was marked as CopyVio and it was not. Reinstate this editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 11:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, among hundreds, perhaps thousands, of cases of copyright infringement, there is one that wasn't, so we should unblock the editor who created those many cases? And what is more we should do so without even being told what article it was, on your say so? Assuming the article you are referring to is the one you have recently removed a template from, had you looked more carefully you would have noticed that it said "Possible copyright infringement" (my emphasis), and also that it went on to say "this article's copyright status requires review. Your help as a Wikipedia editor is requested." The whole point is that we do not know which of the 10000+ articles this user created contain copyright infringements and which don't, so they are tagged to request help in sorting them out. Some of them are not copyright infringements, we know that, that is why they are tagged to ask for help in sorting them out. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After writing the above comment I have discovered that the original version of this article, as written by Darius Dhlomo, was a copyright infringement of http://politifi.com/Persons/Wladimir-Sidorenko, so the suggestion of unblocking Darius Dhlomo because it wasn't has even less merit than I thought. (Note: That web page no longer contains the text in question, but at the time I am writing it is still preserved in Google's cache.) JamesBWatson (talk) 11:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-"among hundreds, perhaps thousands" - if the only one I checked was tagged incorrectly how many others were tagged incorrectly? Hundreds, perhaps thousands? By your own admission you do not know.

-What is the percentage of articles this editor has been involved that have issues? Where is the list of the article that have been tagged or have issued confirmed. To me it looks like a witch hunt against an editor that is a positive contributor. Why can the editor not be educated about his errors instead of being banished? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 12:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does putting a notice saying "this article may or may not contain a copyright infringement, please help by checking whether it does or not" mean that the article is "tagged incorrectly"? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Second reply. I think you are mixing up Wladimir Sidorenko with his brother, Valeriy Sydorenko. I have also checked the link you provided and that looks like a Wiki copy and the website dates from a time after the the article was created. How many times has this been the case? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 12:09, 3 December 2010

No, I am not mixing up Wladimir Sidorenko with his brother, Valeriy Sydorenko, though someone clearly has mixed them up, since the same text was applied in different places to the two of them. You are, however, correct in pointing out my mistake over the dates. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You of course have read this before commenting, I'm sure. You probably have read WP:COPYVIO as well. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-bwilkins, I have had a look at both and I am no wiser. Nor do I believe it answers the questions I have asked about the above articles. Maybe you could help me, maybe you are not interested. Maybe you guys have made your mind up about this guy. I am not here to make enemies or cause trouble. My opinion stems from the fact that I recognise this editors name from articles I read and I was surprised to see this major issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 12:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The editor contributed many new articles, a handful of which were easily found to contain copyvios. When asked, the editor said "it's no big deal - it was only a few". So we looked further. Even more were easily found. The editor said "ok, may eight to ten, but it's no big deal". More were easily found. With a lack of recognition that the copyvios held Wikipedia in a difficult legal position, and a general lack of recognition that this was indeed "a big deal", there was no choice but to indef the editor as decided by the community. We therefore had to assume that the problem was bigger than we thought because we had no cooperation. In the long run, let's assume that only 5% of his edits were copyvios: 5% of 1000 new articles is 50 potential legal problems. 5% of 10,000 is 500. You do the math. Rather than complain about a valid, community imposed and most definitely required to protect the project block, why not help? Recognizing that one of thousands was not a copyvio is beneficial, but for every 1 you find that is not, you have already seen we are finding others that are/were. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-You know more than me, but I find it strange that you seem to want to condemn this editor rather than save and educate him. I am sure you know better than me why that is etc but it seems unfair to me.

These issues are fixable. The best person to fix them is Dariuz. Why not give him the chance to action these mistakes.

I do not want to casue waves but I have found the responses wholly unsatisfactory. It looks to me that he did not realise the seriousness of his actions but now does. In his above post he said "I did learn my lesson after this block (and reading the rage-and-anger-comments posted earlier on). Caution will be my second name." Surely he can be educated and become productive. No? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 13:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the whole history? Seen all of his denials and evasions? Seen the good faith efforts to give him every chance, and to consider unblocking? Seen how he responded to those approaches? If you have then of course you may still disagree with the consensus view, but to describe that view as a "witch hunt" and to suggest that people "want to condemn this editor" does not seem to me to be supported by the evidence. I can speak only for myself, but I spent a huge amount of time studying the editor's editing history, reading everything that had ever been posted on this talk page, and so on and so on, and wrote at some length in an attempt to help the user understand what the problems were. I can assure you that I have come to the conclusion I have in perfectly good faith, after an honest attempt to find any basis at all for unblocking. You may have read all the relevant history as thoroughly as I have and come to a different opinion, in which case you are welcome to express your dissenting opinion, but I invite you to accept my good faith, rather than accusing me of taking part in a "witch hunt" and of "want[ing] to condemn this editor". Nor do I see any evidence at all that any of the other people involved have acted in bad faith or been prejudiced against this editor. One of them even briefly unblocked the editor, and at least one other indicated willing to do so, only to change their mind in the light of the editor's behaviour. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-I have seen some of this but I have also seen that this editor has now taken responsibility for his actions and acknowledges the gravity of the issues at hand and has promised that they will alter their approach to editing. Given his previous impeccable record over a number of years I think he should be given a chance to proven that he has learned for the experience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 11:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Impeccable record????" They spent years putting Wikipedia in a dangerous legal position - this was not something that only happened over the last 2 weeks of their Wikipedia career - it was a part of their character, not a minor slip up. They have an opportunity to become unblocked - provided they have neither socked, WP:MEAT, or otherwise WP:EVADE this block in any way shape or form for an absolute minimum of 6 months to a year. They then will need to appeal directly to WP:ARBCOM - some random new editor (who may indeed be a sock - which would 100% invalidate any chance to return) - who has completely failed to read the background information - posting on their talkpage is not going to magically undo that damage. Let me repeat: there is nothing that can be posted on this talkpage that will induce an unblock. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-OK right, so now I am him. Sounds like you are a bit too biased and involved to be judge and jury with this guy. I will leave it at that, but good luck to the guy. Just my opinion of course. Ta ra! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suarez Mason (talk • contribs) 14:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usernames

Also, if this user is at some point unblocked, I feel that he should change his username so as to avoid confusion with Darius Dhlomo, who is much too busy performing to edit Wikipedia. DS (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Buker

The article Kim Buker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not individually notable, also unable to verify majority of content (other than that she exists and played field hockey)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Milowent • ^talkblp-r 12:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know this editor is blocked, but I expect enough people have this page watchlisted that if anyone cares to double check this prod, they will. Cheers.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 12:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AcropolisCup

Template:AcropolisCup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jenks24 (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2002 Acropolis Boxing Cup

The article 2002 Acropolis Boxing Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications of notability or independent sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2004 Acropolis Boxing Cup

The article 2004 Acropolis Boxing Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications of notability or independent sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harry Taylor (swimmer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Taylor (swimmer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Taylor (swimmer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Acropolis Cup (boxing) 2002 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acropolis Cup (boxing) 2002 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acropolis Cup (boxing) 2002 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

I am Piotr Konieczny, a fellow Wikipedian (User:Piotrus) and a researcher of Wikipedia (http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEAAAAJ). I am currently (in collaboration with WMF) embarking on a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. We have a growing understanding of why an average editor may do so (see http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Former_Contributors_Survey_Results), but we have a very limited understanding of why the top editors would limit their contributions. Yet it is the top editors like yourself who contribute most of Wikiepdia's content, thus understanding this is of vital concern to Wikipedia's project future.

I am contacting you because you are among the top Wikipediana by number of edits, yet your editing activity shows a decline. I would very much appreciate if you would take a minute and answer the following four short questions. Please note this is not a mass email; I am contacting only few dozen of editors like yourself, and each response is extremely valuable. Your response will not be made public, and your privacy will be fully respected.

If you would like to help out in this project and take part in a very short survey, please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you have the opportunity to consider my request? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the reason this particular editor has reduced their participation is the indefinite block for copyright violations. Hut 8.5 15:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, that's the community perspective. But I am trying to understand what s/he would think of it, and how s/he would describe those circumstances. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Urmas Liivamaa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Urmas Liivamaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 16:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Decathlon Year Ranking

Category:Decathlon Year Ranking, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 17:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Athletics NC champions templates

Category:Athletics NC champions templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 23:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Spielberg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christine Spielberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:1983 Pan Am medal titles

Template:1983 Pan Am medal titles has been nominated for merging with Template:Pan American Games medal title. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 19:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Women

Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Women has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 22:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Men

Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 21:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Buenos Aires Marathon Champions Men

Template:Footer Buenos Aires Marathon Champions Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 21:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arturo Angeles

The article Arturo Angeles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Esfandiar Baharmast

The article Esfandiar Baharmast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Esfandiar Baharmast for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esfandiar Baharmast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esfandiar Baharmast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arturo Angeles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arturo Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urmas Liivamaa

The article Urmas Liivamaa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement (also note that referees are not auto-notable, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Notability#Referee_notability). If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francisco Fábregas Bosch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francisco Fábregas Bosch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Fábregas Bosch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wasabi,the,one (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lebanon at the 2005 Mediterranean Games

The article Lebanon at the 2005 Mediterranean Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All the information exists at the 2005 Mediterranean Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2003 Pan American Games

The article Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2003 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2003 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Virgin Islands at the 2003 Pan American Games

The article British Virgin Islands at the 2003 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2003 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicaragua at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Nicaragua at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paraguay at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Paraguay at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Virgin Islands at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Virgin Islands at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grenada at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Grenada at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guyana at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Guyana at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bolivia at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Bolivia at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Costa Rica at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Costa Rica at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antigua and Barbuda at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Antigua and Barbuda at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aruba at the 1999 Pan American Games

The article Aruba at the 1999 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1999 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aruba at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Aruba at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbados at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Barbados at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bolivia at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Bolivia at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grenada at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Grenada at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guyana at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Guyana at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Virgin Islands at the 1995 Pan American Games

The article Virgin Islands at the 1995 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1995 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aruba at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Aruba at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbados at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Barbados at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Virgin Islands at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article British Virgin Islands at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cayman Islands at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Cayman Islands at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grenada at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Grenada at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Honduras at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Honduras at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Netherlands Antilles at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Netherlands Antilles at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peru at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Peru at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paraguay at the 1991 Pan American Games

The article Paraguay at the 1991 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1991 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antigua and Barbuda at the 1983 Pan American Games

The article Antigua and Barbuda at the 1983 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1983 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antigua and Barbuda at the 1987 Pan American Games

The article Antigua and Barbuda at the 1987 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1987 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cayman Islands at the 1987 Pan American Games

The article Cayman Islands at the 1987 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1987 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grenada at the 1987 Pan American Games

The article Grenada at the 1987 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1987 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antigua and Barbuda at the 1979 Pan American Games

The article Antigua and Barbuda at the 1979 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 1979 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aruba at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article Aruba at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belize at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article Belize at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Virgin Islands at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article British Virgin Islands at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suriname at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article Suriname at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article Saint Vincent and the Grenadines at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2007 Pan American Games

The article Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2007 Pan American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already exists at the 2007 Pan American Games article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1998 UCI Road World Championships start list for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1998 UCI Road World Championships start list is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 UCI Road World Championships start list until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bald Boris 17:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Swan (boxer)

The article James Swan (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Priit Reiska

The article Priit Reiska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Priit Reiska for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priit Reiska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priit Reiska until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tunis2001logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tunis2001logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greece at the 2005 Mediterranean Games

The article Greece at the 2005 Mediterranean Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been nominated for deletion for over a week. Topic already covered in sufficent depth at the main games page and sport@games page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greece at the 2005 Mediterranean Games

The article Greece at the 2005 Mediterranean Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable topic with the important parts duplicated in rhe main article for the games and articles for each sport in the games.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serhiy Fesenko

The article Serhiy Fesenko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Netherlands national football team 1995 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Netherlands national football team 1995. Since you had some involvement with the Netherlands national football team 1995 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Matt294069 (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Emmen has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from Emmen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gidonb (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piet Keur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Piet Keur, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Venezuela Squad 1990 FIBA World Championship

Template:Venezuela Squad 1990 FIBA World Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rolands Bulders

The article Rolands Bulders has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wham2001 (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Echenique for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Echenique is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Echenique until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Décastar has been nominated for merging

Category:Décastar has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cregan Joseph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cregan Joseph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cregan Joseph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pablo Peña

The article Pablo Peña has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a BLP on a referee with no assertion or evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khumiso Ikgopoleng

The article Khumiso Ikgopoleng has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanna Visser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanna Visser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanna Visser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Peter Ormond 💬 19:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gustavo Brand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gustavo Brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Kennedy (referee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kennedy (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kennedy (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Athletics World Indoor champions templates has been nominated for renaming

Category:Athletics World Indoor champions templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 2pou (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sosthenes Bitok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sosthenes Bitok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sosthenes Bitok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Idoghor Melody (talk) 06:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aad van Mil

The article Aad van Mil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alain Lemercier

The article Alain Lemercier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Olympic competitor who did not win a medal

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 05:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pan American Cup

A tag has been placed on Category:Pan American Cup indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Non-medaling Basketball squad navboxes 2

A number of "Non-medaling Basketball squad navboxes 2", at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 10#Non-medaling Basketball squad navboxes 2.

Proposed deletion of Toomas Krõm

The article Toomas Krõm has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estonia national football team 2000 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estonia national football team 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonia national football team 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lindsey40186 (talk) 16:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1971 Amstel Gold Race for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1971 Amstel Gold Race is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1971 Amstel Gold Race until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VTVL^Talk 11:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sander van Heeswijk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sander van Heeswijk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sander van Heeswijk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sarrail (talk) 15:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Björn Zikarsky

The article Björn Zikarsky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sargis Karapetyan (footballer, born 1963) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sargis Karapetyan (footballer, born 1963) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sargis Karapetyan (footballer, born 1963) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967)

The article Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer. Only routine coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Bronwen Knox

Bronwen Knox has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LibStar (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Green (field hockey) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Green (field hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Green (field hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mária Urbanik

The article Mária Urbanik has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sukhbir Singh Gill

On 28 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sukhbir Singh Gill, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HC Rotterdam (emblem).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HC Rotterdam (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlie Slusher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Slusher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Slusher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Baláž (boxer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Baláž (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Baláž (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clara A. Djalim (talk) 09:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maurice Marquet

The article Maurice Marquet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pavel Abramov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Abramov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Abramov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mysecretgarden (talk) 23:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mieke de Boer

The article Mieke de Boer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of 1992 Summer Olympics basketball navboxes

Multiple navboxes at Category:1992 Basketball Olympic squad templates that were created by you have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – sbaio 17:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]