User talk:Darrenhusted/archive8
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Darrenhusted. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Question
Did you ever get my e-mail?--WillC 08:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Okay take your time. I'm not too interested in talking religion at the moment in my life anyway.--WillC 12:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, would you mind if you have the time to review Lockdown (2008) since it is under peer review for FA status. I haven't got a review yet and I've decided to start asking people to review it.--WillC 08:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Dave Finlay
Yes he has. he won it at Unforgiven but lost it later in the night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DX120 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 11 September 2008, moved from your user page. →Christian.И 09:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
George Black (shipbuilder)
On May 30, you replaced the content of that article by a redirect to Shipbuilder. Since you were effectively deleting that article, that would normally require some form of discussion. See Help:Merging and moving pages. --Big_iron (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I agree that a redirect is better than deletion. I didn't find it a useful redirect and I would probably vote for improving the article instead, but that may just be my own opinion. The assertion that the subject is important is based on information from a credible source; the original author described it as an "External link" rather than a "Reference" which was an acceptable practice in earlier times. I was not "second guessing" per se; I was just doing some cleanup for articles associated with a particular Wikipedia project and happened to notice that that particular article was in a state inconsistent with what the project documentation stated. --Big_iron (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Express delivery of pineapples
Haha, I saw that you were paying special attention to that article. I think if I started to actively apply the film MoS to some of the articles on here I would never be able to stop... and I think people might complain about that, especially considering that I edit under similar circumstances to yourself. ;-) OBM | blah blah blah 14:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Project Updates
This Month in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member News
Recent News
Collaboration of the Week
Deletion Debates
From the Editors
Contributors to this Issue:
|
Vandalizm
Don't threaten me with your nonsence. I knw my facts, Albinos are deformed species, see the article, and Steph McMichael has great feet, just look at the photos of them. Sinbad Barron (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Wow! Learn to spell. "Vandalism" "nonsense" and "know" would be a start. Darrenhusted (talk)
RE:SummerSlam
I can't listen to them, probably because I am lacking the software, and I do not want to install it into my computer, but just tell me if it works for you, if it does then its an Okay from me :) Thank you so much, it means a lot.--SRX 20:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Why did you undo this perfectly good faith edit? Just wondering. D.M.N. (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Next time, please check the edit fully before undoing, as it could be considered in bad-faith to undo good edits. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 12:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Feh
F. E. H. spells Feh! --FilmFan69 (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Cats
I got the rest of the World Champion categories is wrestler articles.--WillC 08:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I think that is all of them then.--WillC 16:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello sir,
Not being smart or nothing, just wanted to know why the RR winners category isn't necessary. Thanks and Happy Editing! HairyPerry 12:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thank you sir. Just making sure I knew why. Thanks and Happy Editing. HairyPerry 12:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
O.K
From WP:PW: You may want to do it instead of me, because you know a-lot more about wikipedia that I do. O and it's nice to finally meet you, I've seen you on my watchlist forever. =). SteelersFan94 16:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well done, IDK why people like him come here to promote a business they should go here Here!. Take care. SteelersFan94 17:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue
|
Superbad and pretending to be drunk
Darren, in the second revision I made it explained how Jonah Hill pretended to be drunk; the sentence does not just say that he pretended to be drunk, but it says how he pretended to be drunk. WhisperToMe (talk) 08:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue
|
I hope I have managed to provide you with what you were looking for, though in the process I probably have violated WP:3RR. Therefore, you can report me now, if you want. Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- The cites now are formatted like "Ryan G. Van Cleave, The Magical Breasts of Britney Spears, page 90, Red Hen Press, 2006, ISBN 1597090670". The article has been submitted to a GA review and the only unsolved issue is with the ref formats. If you take a look at the article history, you'd see that I am in the middle of fixing them all. But, I was under the impression that improper citation format isn't sufficient ground for content removal without prior notice and a reasonable lead time given. Thanks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, the current format is perfectly in line with the example you provided. Please, let me know if you find any non-compliance. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- The cites now are formatted like "Ryan G. Van Cleave, The Magical Breasts of Britney Spears, page 90, Red Hen Press, 2006, ISBN 1597090670". The article has been submitted to a GA review and the only unsolved issue is with the ref formats. If you take a look at the article history, you'd see that I am in the middle of fixing them all. But, I was under the impression that improper citation format isn't sufficient ground for content removal without prior notice and a reasonable lead time given. Thanks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi sir,
Do you think it was a good idea to divide those two headers up in the Glen Jacobs article? HairyPerry 16:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok, just thought i'd ask a experienced Wikipedian, thanks and happy editing. HairyPerry 16:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)