User talk:Dr. Direwolf

Proposed deletion of Universal psychometrics

The article Universal psychometrics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article topic is not notworthy. It seems to have been used by one researcher in the past 10 years. Modern large language models do evaluate model performance on a (fairly) standardized set of benchmarks, which include some psychometric tests, but they do not use this term (they refer to the tasks as "benchmarks" and performance as "performance").

Amead (talk)

Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture#Governar

Hello! Could you help me to find chinese original name for Governar № 5,6,7 in link above?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:恐狼仔

Hi there! I noticed that you created an alternative account, User:恐狼仔. On the creation log and on the user page of that account, you describe creating this account to be used as a bot or for making fully-automated edits using code. Please note that any bot accounts must be approved by the bot approvals group. You must follow Wikipedia's policy on bots in order to go through the correct processes and procedures, receive the required approvals, and use a bot within compliance. Please do not attempt to make any automated edits from that account until you've been approved to do so after following the policy and going through the correct processes and procedures. Any accounts that are operating as an unapproved bot will be blocked. If you have any questions, please let me know by leaving me a message and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I noticed that you moved your userpage to Dr. Direwolf as an English translation of your account name. Since you want to be known as Dr. Direwolf on the English Wikipedia, it would be a good idea for you to register the account Dr. Direwolf (in Latin characters) as a doppelgänger account, so that no one can impersonate you or register as Dr. Direwolf. Aspening (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aspening: Thanks. I have recently changed my username to "Dr. Greywolf". Here's what happened: I tried to change my username to the English "Dr. Direwolf" over its Cantonese counterpart "恐狼博士", but I couldn't because apparently the name "Dr. Direwolf" was already in use. So I changed my Cantonese wiki account name back to "恐狼博士" and open a doppelganger account named "Dr. Direwolf"? Dr. Greywolf (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Hello dr. Greywolf, Would you write / translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the Cantonese Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Retaliatory consumption

Hello, Dr. Direwolf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Retaliatory consumption".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shutdown of online games

The article Shutdown of online games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a dictionary definition, and does not state what reliable sources have said about the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Noted. Thank you for your comments. I have made some improvements to the article. I believe it is now far beyond a dictionary definition and thus does not warrant deletion. Dr. Greywolf (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shutdown of online games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shutdown of online games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shutdown of online games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mediation (statistics) into Suppressor variable. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goodhart's law

I do not have idea, but souldn't your Metric fixation be in some way connected to the page? Xx236 (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just added the links. Thanks for the reminder. Dr. Greywolf (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]