Jump to content

User talk:Ethnic laundry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello Ethnic laundry, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ethnic laundry, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Gaddang People, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 04:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

When adding text to articles, please remember to provide reliable 3rd party references. I don't disagree about the influences on Free Jazz (though see interviews with Cage himself on the subject), but an assertion that people were serious is essentially point-of-view and needs to be grounded in something tangible. AllyD (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding what AllyD said. One change in particular caught me attention: the lede now says "free jazz is alternately described as an attempt to return jazz to its roots, or to unearth a 'primitive' collective experience." "Alternately described as...," by whom? (See WP:WEASEL.) And is it really just one or the other? Generally, anything set forth in the lede should be corroborated, with sources, somewhere else in the text. That's just the first thing that caught my eye – "Why Free Jazz?" really needs attribution as well. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why you've reverted the article, as you seem to have acknowledged where AllyD and I are coming from, yet your revert doesn't address any of the WP:V issues. You mentioned that you are "still at work" on this – may I suggest not using the article itself as a working draft (especially until verifiability is resolved)? Your personal history is genuinely intriguing, though I hope you don't mean to draw from this when you work on the article (as it's impossible to verify – please see WP:EXPERTISE). Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 February

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Kent School

[edit]

I recently reverted your edits to South Kent School. Please see WP:EXT for proper usage. If there if information relevant to the article and from reliable sources, please consider adding the information to the article and using the links as references. Deunanknute (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at South Kent School, you may be blocked from editing. Deunanknute (talk) 22:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I am working diligently to avoid expressing anger at your characterizations! Please tell me (with examples) how you interpret material I added earlier today as "soapboxing, promotional or advertising". While I believe I earnestly followed W. guidelines, I am willing to listen-to & adopt reasonable suggestions. Peevishness merely makes me (and many others) lose interest in compliance...Ethnic laundry (talk) 22:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, perhaps heavy-handed getting my attention, rather than peevishness...Ethnic laundry (talk) 22:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The primary reason was the external links, which had already been discussed. Also, "The small student-body size, and ongoing access to faculty has been cited by graduates as having a profound and positive effect on their lives" is purely promotional, and adds nothing to the article. Deunanknute (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Working on the links. I was interrupted while referencing the quote (belongs to the Columbia Journalism article, and is supported by NYT article). You asked to move exlink material into article - which I'm doing - but am not uninterrupted. Articles address school add of "prep basketball" program (eg: a dozen un-academic inner-city youth) in early 2000s, and school's claim it was/is in accord with mission (1933 Father Sill article in New Yorker).Ethnic laundry (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have articles of your own which you like ME to criticize, you're welcome to ask!Ethnic laundry (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no relevance to a Wikipedia article in those links. They are essentially 'puff pieces' and contain no encyclopedic information not already in the article. If I am wrong, please, tell me what information, relevant to this article, is in those links. Deunanknute (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

——————————

Actually (as I mention above): Articles address school add of "prep basketball" program (eg: a dozen un-academic inner-city youth) in early 2000s, and school's claim it was/is in accord with mission (1933 Father Sill article in New Yorker). You do not impeach the sources, so I challenge you to tell me why the subject is "puffery" and not a legitimate topic. Indeed, your categorization demonstrates that you have not read all the articles - several of which are critical of "prep" b-ball programs and of SKS itself.

You also may compare my SKS article amendments with those of similar schools to see if some community standard is being breached. I'd suggest Groton, Avon Old Farms, Cate, Darrow (randomly from memory; but you likely want to make your own choices). Should you wish to create, promulgate, and then enforce a standard for all private schools, fine. I don't believe that's what you're doing here, and ask you to examine your behavior.

I understand your abruptness is a concommitant of your busy-ness, but you have to slow down enough to judge between what is a real concern and what you merely don't like. Meanwhile, I'm going to avoid contributing any page while I'm uncertain of how it is evaluated... Ethnic laundry (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I went over every article again, and noted what I got from them here:

  • Outdated piece on iPad use in the classroom; not relevant or unusual
  • Article about Kissinger and Stockdale; mentions an arena, but mostly about Stockdale his relationship to Kissinger
  • New York Times [1]
  • Article about Rob Thomas, who went to, and was greatly helped by SKS, but not about SKS
  • Danbury News-Times [2]
  • Outdated article about a one time reduction in electricity use; irrelevant
  • Standard sports coverage; SKS was top, but no more than routine coverage
  • good article on the basketball program, but very outdated, and mostly opinion, not hard facts
  • Columbia Sports Journalism [4]
  • Mostly seperate pieces on individual students, what SKS info there is is mostly quotes and weasel words
  • "The small student-body size, and ongoing access to faculty has been cited by graduates as having a profound and positive effect on their lives"
  • This statement is correct in that graduates cite the school... , but it is an unimportant/irrelevant opinion
  • Headmaster Vadnais & SKS on YouTube[5]
  • the school has an official website, that website can link to youtube, Wikipedia doesn't unless necessary

As far as other articles go, articles are judged on their own, not against others (see WP:OSE)
Hopefully this clears up the reasoning behind my actions Deunanknute (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much better explanation of what you intended, but in many cases it underscores what your multiple reversions have failed to understand. I am making efforts in the article to discuss the 2000's 'prep' basketball program (and subsequent hockey and soccer programs) in the context of the school's mission formulated in the 1920s. These programs are [a] vastly different than the traditions of the first 75 years of the school, and [b] similar to programs that have received significant criticism in the press. I believe it is obvious the subject deserves consideration in any but the most superficial description of the school. Can you help me accomplish this objective - or are you merely a nay-sayer?Ethnic laundry (talk) 03:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to discuss the 'prep' basketball program, etc. Then do so in the article, using proper links as cited references. Don't just list them under "External links."
As far as the schools mission from the 1920's, please see WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI. In fact, the whole page is a great guideline for school articles.
If you want, you could post proposed changes/additions here, in the article's talk page, or in your sandbox and I'll give whatever input I can. Deunanknute (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:South Kent School (aerial).jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:South Kent School (aerial).jpeg, which you've attributed to http://southkentschool.org/about/fast-facts-about-sks. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Damn! I had permissions because I created the picture, but was entirely unable to figure out how to upload them. So I just let that shit expire... Ethnic laundry (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prentice E. Sanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willie Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ethnic laundry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Durand Echeverria) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Durand Echeverria, Ethnic laundry!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Kindly add more references. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—usernamekiran(talk) 21:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanley Dance, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Hammond and Bob Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ethnic laundry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ethnic laundry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exodus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wesleyan on stage and camera has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Wesleyan on stage and camera has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of coups and coup attempts

[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I've undone your addition to the article List of coups and coup attempts about Donald Trump, as none of the sources you used described it as a coup or attempted coup. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 14:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I added a half-dozen reference-links to articles in the established press at local and national levels which used the word "coup" to describe the administration activities I mention. Then, on 1/4/21 I updated the post with information on Trump's 1/2/21 phone call with the Georgia Secretary of State (for which the former President is, in part, presently being impeached). This all is for nothing anyway, as partisan vandalism has activated the mindlessness of Wikipedia's process-mavens and a consensus was reached to remove the entire Trump mess by calling it something else and consigning it to encyclopedic oblivion. Must tell you, folks, that I find it harder and harder to be a independent, un-partisan content provider in the world of ever-expanding Wikipedia rules and manners... Ethnic laundry (talk) 16:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Itawes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaddang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaddang people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claveria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For Gaddang people. Corny as it is, I think this says it better than anything I could write in response to your latest post in Talk:Gaddang people. Austronesier (talk) 22:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Austronesier: Whooaa! I'm truly honored! Ethnic laundry (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Gaddang people. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Seems I did not notice that reference https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/2704622 in Gaddang People was a re-setting of the material "mirrored" from Philippine revolts against Spain. And I do note that the latter has been cited as lacking verifiable citations (kind of a force-4 hurricane of lacking sources!)
Well, I did come up with a stable (Wayback) citation from the Philippines National Institute of History to support my claim; and instructional material as well for a class in Filipino history at the University of St. Louis (Tuguegaro, Cagayan) which extends beyond my statement. I am leaving the original Wikipedia "Revolts" article alone because it seems to be a dog-pile that needs extensive work I can't commit to immediately.
Thanks very much for the heads-up! The statement is back in, with appropriate references...
Ethnic laundry (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urban fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaddang people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bambang and Bagabag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Fixed w provincial pointer Ethnic laundry (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Aaron Solo! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on South Kent School

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page South Kent School, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urban fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Ethnic laundry (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ethnic_laundry&oldid=1258281012"