User talk:JeffUK

Degethal Labs SRL

Thanks for the clarification! That was helpful. Just blocked the account. ceranthor 15:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

DanCherek (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

I am declaring that I haven't provided any self-contradictory articles on Wikipedia. And that many of the " sources " on wikipedia is self-contradictory. And I have provided refutations against those self-contradictory articles on wikipedia that is filled with misinformations. But as it is clashing with someone's personal opinion, they keep reverting My edits without providing any counter refutations. And when I have filled complaint against that person, few other people whose opinion is similar to that person started being bigoted and trying to suppress the sources that I havw provided. Kindly inform Me the steps that I need to take in order to take action against them. Thanks. Gorgon Slayer (talk) 11:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hell Theater article speed deletion revision

Pls check my replies in my User talk:Bob4us about notability of Hell Theater article. Thanx Bob4us (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Nice job on the BLPN closure! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is a test

If this was not a test, it would not say 'This is a test' JeffUK 09:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment to the Vector 2022/2010 RfC was moved

Hello JeffUK,

This is to let you know that, in the recent RfC about the rollback from V2022 to V2010, I moved your comment from the section dedicated to the width question to the general "support" section, as you said that with your comment you wanted to support the general rollback. If it's wrong, please correct it. Æo (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi JeffUK! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:27, Tuesday, January 24, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Antigua KNH

You are correct. I genuinely believed that the Antigua KNH honorees were not entitled to use the prenomials/titles Sir and Dame. I investigated after you and another editor advised me that my edits were problematic. You credited me as a good faith editor in your edit summary ("Reverted good faith edits by 107.122.161.37 (talk): "In Antigua and Barbuda, Knights Companion of the Order may use the title "Sir" in front of their forename" Also as per WP:COMMONNAME they named a stadium after him with 'Sir..'").

So how did I go from good faith to final vandal warning? By being thorough? I am not a vandal as you would see if you reviewed my edits. Please remove the vandalism warning from my talk page. The neighbors will complain as it lowers the real estate values, LOL 😆. Yours, 107.122.161.37 (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@107.122.161.37: You do realize you are permitted to remove warnings listed on your own talk page, right? Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure but it means more if the person who left it reverts it. I am just too sentimental.107.122.161.37 (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:107.122.161.37 The reason for the rapid escalation of the warnings, is that you seem to edit extremely quickly (to a point I wasn't sure if you were a human or a bot...), and I was trying to get your attention before you went through several dozen KNH holders and made a change to them against consensus. I do recognise you normally make good edits that are valuable, you'll notice I didn't revert your changes wholesale, only those that made this specific change. JeffUK 08:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, glad you are here @Kirbanzo, this way I can show you and Jeff what I found: "In Antigua and Barbuda, Knights Companion of the The Most Distinguished Order of the Nation may use the prefix ‘Sir’ in front of their forename, and their wives may use the title ‘Lady’ in front of their husband’s surname. Similarly, Dames Companion of the Order may use the title ‘Dame’ in front of their forename. No specific privilege exists for their husbands. The Order of the National Hero was first established and constituted by the Parliament of Antigua and Barbuda under the National Heroes Act 1994, in 1998 reestablished and most recently amended in 2015",

however, recipients of Jamaican state honours do not have the right to Sir/Dame prenomials/titles. "Members of these [Jamaica National Hero] orders are not entitled to the prefix of Sir" ([1]), according to Bob Juchter van Bergen Quast (CEO - Swiss Chamber of Commerce in The Netherlands, President - Court of Arbitration of the European Chamber of Digital Commerce). Interesting, right? 107.122.161.37 (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Compound of four tetrahedra

Hey Jeff! What a great image you added. I mentioned you in the talk page for the article, asking if you could by any chance reproduce the image with a neutral white background, and maybe slightly darker overtones for the tetrahedra so that they match a little more closely (they already match) with the top and lateral perspective images of the compound that are also included. Thank you again, beautiful work (I actually love the pink background, but I think users would prefer white). Radlrb (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Artvee

That is the strangest mirror. They seems to have paid meticulous attention to image copyright across various timeframes and countries, and then just completely ripped off the Wikipedia text on every page without the correct license or attribution? Hopefully they read the notice you sent. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the wording of 3RR

Hi. Can you offer your thoughts regarding the question I asked here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Newmark

Hi Jeff, I wanted to alert you to this request on the Craig Newmark article talk page. It is based off our previous conversation on re- organizing the ''Philanthropy'' section into categories. Much thanks for reviewing. Cnewmark (talk) 22:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Hughes Paul

Jeff I am hoping to both factually correct and include all that Joshua Hughes Paul achieved in his wikipedia history. He was an amazing man, educator, public speaker and my great grandfather. The edits I proposed were documented and published by the historian of the Univ of Utah and historians by the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. His list of authored books was from the library of congress. I didnt use any of my own thoughts just what is published by reputable authors. Can you reverse your acceptance of my suggested edits so the record stands corrected and accurate. I admit I am not fully knowledgeable about how to make, edit or suggest corrections on wikipedia. Please let me know if there is a more appropriate process to follow. If its easier to connect live please let me know. I am happy to share my mobile number and personal email. Best MHP2601:681:6180:2140:A947:14B4:2E24:7721 (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my wifi user talk name is RockyMtn2

thanks RockyMtn2 (talk) 17:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello JeffUK:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask what I did wrong this time?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1194558055 ExoField (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JeffUK. Thank you for your work on Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this well-referenced page, that shows sustained coverage for this charity over many years. For future pages, from the manual of style (WP:MOS) remember that headings are in sentence case and external links are after references. The categories should also be the most specific ones available.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Read case

I disagree that the Albert family and McCabe family are "third-party" and have nothing to do with the case. Their power and influence and their connection with the lead investigator is the core problem in the case and why this case is significant (Brian is a BPD officer, Chris is a selectman in the town of Canton, and Proctor family is close to them). These are all facts. Mikiko609 (talk) 21:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hi JeffUK! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2024 United Kingdom riots that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. C F A 💬 19:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I actually didn't intend to remove any text on that edit, so it's a good job you pointed it out, I'll check it's been added back in in the meantime. JeffUK 18:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sam Carling

On 22 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sam Carling, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sam Carling was the first UK member of Parliament to be born in the 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sam Carling. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sam Carling), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rallia Christidou

Please, read carefully the differences between two editions before reverting. I ama trying to add sourced material and update the information for the person. 193.92.58.148 (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but please do use edit summaries to avoid this sort of confusion in the future. You'll see I've made a further edit!

JeffUK 18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i saw it. Thank you! 193.92.58.148 (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]