User talk:Kwamikagami
Your comments may be archived here after 48hrs |
Word/quotation of the moment:
Astrology has no effect on reality, so why should reality have any effect on astrology? – J.S. Stenzel, commenting on astrological planets that astrologers acknowledge don't really exist
(Previous quotes)
|
---|
|
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Stop re-publishing editions which lack necessary citations
[edit]Your 'Phags-pa' theory section is backed by little to no sources, and have 'citations needed' notifications that have not been addressed for years. If you want to keep these things in the article, ADD CITATIONS. The article was covered with the citations needed template even before I new it existed. Daldidandal (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- All sources for the article are listed, they're just not cited for every statement. Adding 'cn' for those statements is fine. Placing those tags in the section headers, rather than in the statements themselves, defaces the article, but more importantly, falsifying quotations is completely inappropriate, and repeatedly doing so could possibly get you blocked. That falsified info is the reason I reverted you. [If your edits were corrections, then you're obviously going off the refs and so have seen that those refs exist.] Going on to blank content because you're annoyed at your bad edits being reverted is also inappropriate. I have no problem with you tagging statements or sections that you feel need better referencing, just use the templates as they were intended to be used. — kwami (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Daldidandal (talk) 23:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Bono dialect
[edit]Your second renaming of Bono dialect on 10 November was improper. Instead of insistently repeating your reverted bold move of 12 October, you should have submitted an RM request for discussion. — BarrelProof (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've made a move request. The current name contradicts the consensus of sources. — kwami (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
"implosive affricates [are] unlikely"
[edit]In August 2015 you added this to the Implosive consonant page.
- There are no IPA symbols for implosive fricatives. Implosive fricatives are unknown, and implosive affricates unlikely.
In January 2024 Whoop whoop pull up added a "why" tag. Would you be able to provide more detail to support this claim?
90.194.29.218 (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can change it to 'Implosive fricatives and affricates are unknown.' — kwami (talk) 20:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)