User talk:Maricotes

June 2018

Your recent editing history at Whataboutism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anaxial (talk) 00:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maricotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for evasion but I have no relation to the editor my user page says I am “suspected” of being a sockpuppet of. Maricotes (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In that case, you'll need to explain your inappropriate behaviour and explain why it looks identical to that account, if you wish to be considered for an unblock. Yamla (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maricotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

CU will show that I am not that other editor. Go ahead and check, please.Maricotes (talk) 23:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I just took a look at the contributions between yourself and Wikii6B, and I'm blinded by the sheer amount of clear evidence that exists.... and how significant it is ... I think I need to see an eye doctor..... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"you'll need to explain your inappropriate behaviour and explain why it looks identical to that account, if you wish to be considered for an unblock". This wasn't a suggestion. You have to do this if you wish to be considered for an unblock. --Yamla (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maricotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

so basically neither of you are actual CU. Could an actual CU please clear this up? Maricotes (talk) 23:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't need CU for clear cases. Your appeal does not address the reason for your block. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were warned. Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 23:35, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]