User talk:Nutriveg

After seeing so much disrespect of the Wikipedia's policies including the use of coercive power when he tried to see those same policies respected, specially those of WP:OR and WP:DUE, this user feels that WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT WELCOME his contributions and decided to no longer watch against vandalism the over 500 articles in his watchlist nor significatively improve any article, like he have already done with his over 2000 article edits despite the large amount of medical knowledge relevant to the general public he gets in contact by his daily life. This user reserves the right to ocasionally edit only a few articles, only when he wants to do so and may not answer further demands.

Say it ain't so!

Nutriveg, without people like you Wikipedia will soon become a cheap way for the corporate world to advertise their wares and justify their practices. I see that happening already. Every policy that wikipedia put in place to insure fairness and honesty can be used to intimidate inexperienced editors (like me) and force them to give in to a more knowledgeable-sounding source.

I have no idea what the recent problem is (and I wish you wouldn't have deleted it!), but I do know that from what I've seen of your edits you are up-to-date on your information, fair, appropriate, very hardworking, and you do know what you are talking about. It is for those reasons that I came to your talk page wanting to ask for help with my editing the high fructose corn syrup article. Are you available for helping a less experienced editor? My best to you, and respectfully, Gandydancer (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nutriveg, I have been working on an article that you watched over for some time, the BPA article. I feel that you are largely responsible for the fact that this article has been kept up to date and the way that it has been organized which is making further editing easier. As I do my own edits, I see again and again that you not only knew the material very well, you presented it in a fair and professional manner. Mothers and other friends of children have been organizing across the US to ban BPA, and your efforts have done untold good for many people - I want you to know that. Gandydancer (talk) 15:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vibrating platform listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vibrating platform. Since you had some involvement with the Vibrating platform redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:UnreferencedMED

Template:UnreferencedMED has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Superweeds" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Superweeds. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 2#Superweeds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 05:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]