Jump to content

User talk:OdinFK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia

[edit]

Hello, OdinFK! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. In addition, you can also have me set you up with a suitable adoptor, but only at your wish. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Sincerely, ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Template moving

[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you moved a template to Template:Fußball-Bundesliga (women) 2007-08. While I agree that the template name should reflect the name of the league as it is in wikipedia, please do not add season names to the templates. The templates are changed after every season. The reason for this is the following. If you had a new template for each season, you'd have to add it to the relevant club articles. In a little time, any club playing constantly at the same level would have dozens of league templates in its article. (E.g. Hamburger SV would have more than 40 Bundesliga templates) This is utterly impracticable. I'd therefore suggest you move the page to Template:Fußball-Bundesliga (women). Regards, Madcynic (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A: Okay. I will have a look how that works, tomorrow. No time now, but I'll figure that out (I guess I know already how it will be done) and than change it back, tomorrow. Thanks for the advice.

A: Moved back and updated for the 2008-09 season.

Re: Bayern Munich GA review

[edit]

It looks a lot better now. However, some paragraphs still go by uncited, including:

  • "Since the 1920s the 1. FC Nuremberg"
  • "These days Bayern considers itself a national club,"
  • "Among the main advertising partners"
  • Most of the "Training facility" section

But it's getting there! Cheers. Gary King (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephan Fürstner

[edit]

I noticed you reverted a deletion on FC Bayern's wikipedia page. Do we know if Stephan Fürstner has been loaned out to any club like Christian Lell went to FFC Koeln or like Mats Hummels did to Burussia Dortmund? Kingjeff (talk) 17:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind if you copy our discussion to the talk page of Bayern's Wikipedia page. Kingjeff (talk) 02:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kraft

[edit]

There's nothing you can do to stop them deleting it, but on Sunday he will play a 3. Liga match, which passes notability, which means he won't be able to be deleted. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 09:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I keep deleting the article since it was previously deleted via AFD (case: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Ferry): the fact he is signed for Bayern Munich is not a proof of notability in itself, he must actually play a competitive game in order to be notable. Hofert and Rieß are not notable themselves for the same reason, so an AFD case about them can be easily opened as well. Feel free to recreate the article once he plays a competitive game in a fully professional league. --Angelo (talk) 12:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article restored, I also added the source you gave me. Bye. --Angelo (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frankfurt players

[edit]

I saw your request at WP:RM but that page doesn't deal with moving categories - you need to go to the venue for speedy category renames and follow the instructions there. Regards, BencherliteTalk 08:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FC Bayern Munich GA Review

[edit]

Hi. I've reviewed the article. I have some concerns (see here), so I have put the article on hold for 7 days. Drop me a line if I've been unclear anywhere. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 10:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SC Verl

[edit]

You rated the article SC Verl as "Low / C". I certainly agree on the "Low" importance, but I'd like to hear what made you rate the article as "C" quality (so I can improve it). Thanks! -- DevSolar (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

move of germany's national football team

[edit]

Hello. I did start a discussion on it here and actually you were the only one to comment. I thought you were in favor of the name change reading your comment, unless I misunderstood you. It could always be moved back. The name change was brought up here for the women's team. I can see their point, actually. --Pinkkeith (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the standardization for national teams as defined by the football WikiProject. I pointed this out to the editors discussing the women's national team. I assume that this does apply to both men's and women's teams. --Pinkkeith (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Logo use in DFB Pokal articles

[edit]

Just a head's up. I've been removing team logos placed in the finals sections of annual DFB Pokal summaries because they are being tagged as non-compliant use by an image police bot. I'd be happy to see them stay, but I don't want to have to mess perpetually with the image enforcers either. Images (including logos) need to have a fair use rationale attached to them when they are used in an article.

Nice work, by the way, in putting those cup summaries together. Wiggy! (talk) 10:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I liked them, too. Oh well. I've just been pulling the logos down as I get notice from whatever image bot is currently complaining (as long as its legitimate) or adding FURS where I can. Thanks for the reply. Keep well. Wiggy! (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DFB Pokal

[edit]

The kits mainly come from the photo galleriers here [1] (only Bayern Munich, but I'm sure Google will turn up other clubs). Positions come from my own knowledge of the players. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power Nine - need for reliable source 3rd parties

[edit]

None of the "sources" that you listed come close to meeting our WP:RS guidelines. Please return the Prod. notice. -- The Red Pen of Doom 02:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rickard Österberg

[edit]

There's seems to be some confusion concerning Rickard Österberg's country. He's listed as a Swede at the list of Pro Tours and some parts of the 03-04 Pro Tour season where he's also listed as Norwegian. We should change this to one country or did he move during the PT season? The DCI has him listed as Norwegian, living in Oslo. Creet (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia!Jamiebijania (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German football championship 1933

[edit]

Hello Odin, as the person who has created many of the DFB Pokal season articles, I was wondering whether you could have a llok at German football championship 1933. We are still missing almost all articles on the championship seasons, which is almost a little embaressing. I was wondering, whether we could come up with a common format and then create them, piece by piece. Much of it I've copied from the German article, some I've added myself. Your oppinion and input would be appreciated, especially in regards to the improvement of the layout. Thanks, EA210269 (talk) 05:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick feed-back, its just what I was after. Regarding the various points you brought up:
  • I will change the results to ndashes, thats easy.
  • No, the flags are not necessary, I get rid of them as well.
  • I will link aet, thats simple, too.
  • Linking players that have played in a German final seems a good idea. Many of them would have played for Germany and therefore deserve an article, anyway. I think, I stick with this. With the referee its a different matter, propably will de-link him.
  • I usually separate sources and references in my articles. In sources, I list all websites and books I have used to write it while in references, I put the reflist template to have all inline-citation there by themselvs.
  • Yeah, the prose in the article is a proplem. I would like to have some more and bettter stuff but I havn't found a good source that tells about the final yet.
  • I don't rank quality or importance of my own artilces because it wouldn't be an unbiased assessment.

Anyway, thanks a lot for your help, I will take it on board and make some alterations as soon as I'm done with my current work. Have a great day, EA210269 (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have incooperated your suggestions and expanded it to German football championship 1932 as well. I propably won't have the time to go on to the other existing ones, but once we have a standard to go by, it should be easier. Thanks for everything, EA210269 (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A little recognition

[edit]
German football/Deutscher Fußball Barnstar
Awarded in recognition of your contributions in the area of German football.
For your steady stream of work. Thanks and keep it up. Wiggy! (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


a little help please

[edit]

I edited the bayarena page by creating an infobox. i used information from this website: http://www.stadiumguide.com/bayarena.htm, i was wondering if u could show me how to add the reference. thanks (talk

image question

[edit]

ive read the wiki articles about what constitutes fair use. but do logos such as the superliga 2009 one qualify under fair use?

Notability of Pro Tour Players

[edit]

I'd like to invite you to take part in the discussion concerning the notability of Magic Pro Tour players. –Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a current or past contributor to season articles within Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, I thought I'd let you know about the season article task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of season articles of all kind. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the task force page. Thanks!

The reason for this invitation is the attempt to establish a season guideline for club season articles. If you look at 2009–10 FC Bayern Munich season, Eintracht Frankfurt season 2009–10 and Hertha BSC season 2009–10, you will see that each of those articles has a different layout and different contents. In general, you could say that for each of these articles, which significantly obstructs the readability when jumping between season articles. In order to achieve a common standard, a discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Season article task force#Club season articles. Please voice your opinion! --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 00:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Enjoy your holiday!

Luca Toni

[edit]

Thank you! Raul17 (talk) 22:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old-style rarities

[edit]

I drew up the table of old-style rarities you asked about over on Talk:List of Magic: The Gathering sets. I haven't added it to the actual article because I'm too lazy to figure out where in the article to put it right now. I noticed some are some inconsistencies in the sources, which I noted; since you appear to know rather more about this than me, perhaps you can sort it out, or can find someone who can. --Sniffnoy (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fußball-Bundesliga (women) 2005-06 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A little help?

[edit]

I'm currently having a dispute over at Magic: The Gathering deck types. I know that you've done good work on these articles in the past, and I'd appreciate if you could take a look. Croctotheface (talk) 04:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you took a look. I didn't want to say anything in particular to bias you before you took a look, since I wanted to avoid canvassing. I'll be a little more forthcoming now that you're on the record. My main issue, as I've said on the talk page, is that BlueMage (who has basically acknowledged that he's the IP) refuses to let anyone edit his work, and then he refuses to work on a compromise on the talk page. As a result, I was willing to just revert him when maybe I should've asked you or someone else to weigh in sooner, but I didn't see what other point there was to make. As far as the specific wording, it's possible that mine is better or worse; I don't much care about that. As you said, it's all about what's better for the article. However, we can't have a situation where one guy tries to exercise complete control over the page, which is what he's tried to do.
The one thing I would quibble with is that it's definitely better to attribute the opinions to the specific authors (Ben Rubin has a WP page that we can link to, actually) compared to using some kind of passive-voice, weasel-worded statement like "some/many people believe." Croctotheface (talk) 08:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I want to talk with you about something. Please contact me >> my tr-wikipedia profil: tr:User:Nazif_İLBEK or e-mail in my profil. —Preceding undated comment added 14:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Yeah, sure. And why wouldn't you talk with me if you actively wanted to? I mean that's what my talk page is for. OdinFK (talk) 15:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • We have a project about Euro2016. We need a German editor. If you are interested, I'm waiting for your reply. nilbek@hotmail.com.tr

I can occasionally look at en.wikipedia. Please reply to my e-mail address. Nazif İLBEK (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of Magic: The Gathering sets

[edit]

Hello OdinFK, as is see that you are regulary contributing to MTG articles i'd like to bring this question under your attention. I don't want to take action on my own, so i thought about firstly asking you what you think about it. Cheers --Narayan (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A WikiProject for women in the sports

[edit]

Bonjour , please read this Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Women's Sport , bon week-end --Geneviève (talk) 13:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article All-time Fußball-Bundesliga table has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time English Football League 1st Division Table.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 19:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

[edit]

Can you check the Bundesliga matches and see where I went wrong? The link is User:Kingjeff/2011–12 1. FSV Mainz 05 season. Thanks. Kingjeff (talk) 05:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you can do much about this problem. Mainz moved into a new stadium. But the template still shows Stadion am Bruchweg as opposed to Coface Arena. Both need to be available if it is possible. Kingjeff (talk) 06:23, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for 2011–12 Hannover 96 Season

[edit]

As a Season article task force member, you might be interested in the Deletion review for 2011–12 Hannover 96 Season redirect. The history of the debate is that the article was a duplicate article of 2011–12 Hannover 96 season. The difference being is that the s was capitalized in the duplicate article. So, I put the article up for deletion. Here is the afd page for your reference. It would be good for you to, irregardless of which side you may be on, to comment and to cast endose or overturn vote. Kingjeff (talk) 04:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 Fortuna Düsseldorf season

[edit]

I started the 2011–12 Fortuna Düsseldorf season. I could use some assistance since adding so many matches can be a tedious job. Kingjeff (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In List of Magic: The Gathering Grand Prix events, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Columbus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport

[edit]

Hello if women's sports fascinate you: WikiProject Women's sport and Portal:Women's sport, --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This can be very helpful

[edit]

Dear M. OdinFK, Here is a on the spot self survey for active Editors, without turning to look at your histories, try to answer the following from your gut reaction. What percentage of your work on wiki is: adding content? editing content? revediting others content? Deleting? blocking/unblocking? making warnings? Now jot down your answers, and then check your histories, how accurate were your gutguesses?

curious to hear, thanks for taking the time if you do! BespokeFM (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

For creating and updating articles like 2011–12 2. Fußball-Bundesliga (women).

LauraHale (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Magic: The Gathering national champions

[edit]

Hello OdinFK!
I noticed your recent edits to the List of Magic: The Gathering national champions article. Please note that under the new system the title of National Champion will still be awarded. The countries' player with the most pro points (who will lead the World Magic Cup team) will officially be recognised as the countries' national champion. That should be mentioned in the article. See Spanning the World Magic Cup and World Magic Cup Runneth Over
Gruß
Creet (talk) 10:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Power Nine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/FC Bayern Munich/archive1

[edit]

I nominated the article for peer review. As the editor with the most edits on the page, you might want to look at it. Kingjeff (talk) 04:32, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Magic: The Gathering professional players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Rubin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of professional Magic: The Gathering players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Long (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Magic: The Gathering Pro Tour events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering artists for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Magic: The Gathering artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The Gathering artists (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Power Nine may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Image:black lotus.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[The Black Lotus, signed by artist [[Christopher Rush]]]] [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]
Happy New Year from the
Women's Football Task Force!
Women's Football Taskforce
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles throughout the year. 2014 is looking bright! We're glad to have you as a contributing member of the Women's Football Task Force and hope to see more of your great work in the new year. Cheers!
Task force quick links
Open Tasks | Recognized content | Members | Resources
New! Portal:Women's association football

MTG Navbox

[edit]

I had completely missed the MTG navbox before. How is the content for that determined and edited? gujamin (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the content of the navbox is determined like most other things here. Basically everything that is related to the topic goes in if somebody puts it in. If at some point there is disagreement there will be discussion. You can edit the box with the small handles in the top left corner of the box. The 'E' is for 'Edit'. In case you haven't worked with infoboxes before, please be careful when changing something. The infobox is used on hundreds of sites, and if it gets corrupted it will not be there on all those sites. Cheers, OdinFK (talk) 07:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FC Spöck listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect FC Spöck. Since you had some involvement with the FC Spöck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magic: The Gathering World Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sam Black and Martin Müller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of German football champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, OdinFK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation for you

[edit]

Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the...

Women's Sports worldwide online edit-a-thon

Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes
(including WOSO players)
are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport.

#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017


Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO?

According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017.

What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome.

Recent developments

New initiatives have been created for:

  • FA WSL (England's top-division league)
  • NCAA (American university teams, conferences, etc.)
  • W-League (Australia's top-division league)
Ongoing tournaments
Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Did you know?

While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}.

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, OdinFK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Magic: The Gathering Pro Tour events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018

[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018


Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014
Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Current season articles needing creation


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, OdinFK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Bayern Munich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019


Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019
Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019

Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going.

WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST!

WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019.

Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126

Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}.

These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Climbing German Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auerbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020

[edit]

WP:WOSO News: October 2020


Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.
Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.

Hello WOSO editors!

What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work!

Fall Focus: FA WSL articles

You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we?

Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on?

Historical Topics
Managers
Teams
Players
Other

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors.

Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Dougherty

[edit]

Information icon Hello, OdinFK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Dougherty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Dougherty

[edit]

Hello, OdinFK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Dougherty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Magic: The Gathering

[edit]

Magic: The Gathering has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]