User talk:Phil070707

Welcome!

Hello, Phil070707, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Wuerzele (talk) 04:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe, on the other hand, that all my edits conform to the "Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV)" you mentioned.Cheers, Phil. Phil070707 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Phil070707. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 22:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the translation

Thank you for the translation. Would you be so kind to translate the rest of the poll options? It would be very useful

[1] Kind regards--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to find time for it tomorrow. Cheers, --Phil070707 (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you in advance, I really want to know exactly what this poll meant. Also thank you for bringing some neutrality to the Crimean subject which is dominated currently by militant pov.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MyMoloboaccount: - as you can see though, neutrality isn't really appreciated in English Wikipedia. The ban is outrageous - they even didn't check things like ISP etc that would normally help identify multiple accounts. I was simply banned based on the 'gut feeling' of one biased admin who justified it with a disruptive account's conspiracy theories. Phil070707 (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I feel very sorry for what happened. Have you tried asking for re-assessing your block ? If you can still use the talkpage, could you provide the translation as well? It is very important to me.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MyMoloboaccount: - the translation is available here: [2]. Phil070707 (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you have edited are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBEE

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

My very best wishes (talk) 17:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me, but I already saw the warning on Volunteer Marek's talk page and will act accordingly. Phil070707 (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what exactly you mean, but in any event, I would also recommend reading instructions ("Important information" banner) on pages like WP:AE and elsewhere. Best, My very best wishes (talk) 17:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The point of this caution is to demonstrate that you have been made aware of the fact that you are engaged in editing articles subject to WP:ARBEE. It's irrelevant whether you've seen the caution elsewhere before, but has simply placed here to ensure that you are aware of potential sanctions being imposed should you drop your guard as to adhering to policies and guidelines carefully. You might be surprised at how easy it is to overstep the mark inadvertently, particularly as you're a new user (working on the assumption that your contributions as an IP were fairly casual). --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Iryna Harpy: I think I have performed dozens of smaller edits over the years (close to a decade). I don't intend to perform any further in this project but to go on editing other language versions. The last week made it abundantly clear that primitive accounts that behave like frustrated reckless teenagers and for some reason are online 24/7 own some topics. The ban was ridiculous but I won't care to appeal it as I find the project no longer workable.
I was absolutely NOT interested in making Russian chauvinists or Neo-Stalinists look nicer, all I have been interested in was to make articles more objective, readable and oppose POV from the right, center and left [3], [4]. Apparently, that's not what Wiki administration is interested in. 'Pearls of logic' like this [5] [6] (there are dozens more available) are very much appreciated instead. Regards, Phil070707 (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]