User talk:Pjt48

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article List of poets may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Nlu (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pjt48, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Per your request at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities, I moved the article you're working on to Robert Peters and gave it a category. The help desk is probably a better place to ask questions than the reference desk, but since I was reading the reference desk, I decided to answer your question anyway. Feel free to continue editing Robert Peters. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Elkman for your remarkable expediency in lending me a helping hand in getting by article suitable and formatted. I admire your dedication as a Wikipedian. I find my exploration of the Wikipedia fascinating but daunting Pjt48 01:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Pjt48 13:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Plymell Article

Hi Pjt48. Thank you for your message and contributions to Wikipedia. The reason that it looked weird on the page was that spaces has been left at the beginning of the line. For some reason which I am not sure of, it makes it look weird. I have removed the section though for several reasons explained in my edit summery. If you have any more questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks, Tiddly-Tom 19:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Gilman Norris

Hey Tom-- I'm trying to clean & wikify more this Norris article. What I can't seem to rid of are the boxed forms that some of the sections have-- I appreciate your professional assistance Pjt48 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thank you for your kind message to my user talk page ;) I have fixed those weird blue dotted boxes. The reason for their emergence was that before the star, there were a number of space. To rectify the problem, I remove the spaces. If you have any more problems, feel free to contact me. As you describe on your user page, you can have problems logging in. If this happens, do not worry, you can edit with an IP. It may be useful to keep a note of my user talk pages location : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tiddly_Tom with the rest of your wikipedia documentation for if you have a problem with logging in. I do not meen that you should edit with an IP all the time, but just if you have some problems with logging in. I would be happy to help you with any problems you have. Happy Editing! Tiddly-Tom 17:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peters

Many thanks for your comment. You did excellent work with the Robert Peters article. I like being part of the WikiProject Wisconsin. Being born and raised in Wisconsin, I am familar with the state.Many thanks--RFD (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Cluebot is an automated account that looks at all edits made to wikipedia and if they look like vandalism to it, it will undo the change and then leave the user a message to tell them that they have done it. The reason it said my name in its edit summery is that after it had edited the page, it would look exactly like the page did after I last edited it. ClueBot is one of the good guys and reverts thousands of nasty edits everyday. If you come across any more vandalism then feel free to undo it. If I can help any more, feel free to leave me another message. Tiddly-Tom 01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It happens to all sorts of articles. Just look here and you can see about 500 pages from which I removed vandalism. But due to all the good editors of Wikipedia 'bad' edits are normally removed with in seconds. Tiddly-Tom 16:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry of the United States

Hello You seemed to be informative about reverting drastic revisions back to the original article. This unknown person called poetactionboy [1] seemed to taken upon himself to do drastic revise the article on Poetry of the United States. I do my share of editing many articles but I don't how to revert unsourced revision back to where the article was before such drastic revision. Can you give me any advice on this matter? Thank you for your careful scrutinity on your other reversion. Pjt48 (talk) 01:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the changes as a whole... [2] he moved and combined sections rather and did some minor grammar changes. Not being a specialist in poetry, American or otherwise, I recommend you take a good look at the changes as a whole and discuss it with him on the talk page of the article or his talk page the parts that you are having trouble with. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 12:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pjt48. Thanks for paying attention. I'm sorry if I've done injury to any of your hard work. Most of what I did was regrouping and cleanup -- I realize some of it's not yet sourced, but I'm looking for the right links. It did seem to me that some of the material on the page was poorly sourced or completely unsourced, and some of it seemed to fall outside general notability guidelines. Why not incorporate them into a separate page on alternative poetries (along with slam, online 'zines, etc.?) Poetactionboy (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:RobertPetersWikipedia.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:RobertPetersWikipedia.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Northrup

You licensed the image as Wikipedia only/non-commercial use. Wikipedia only accepts images which are public domain or GFDL GNU Free Documentation License
If you have permission from the copyright holder (who might not be Mr Northrup) to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.

jimfbleak (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Good Night, Paul

Your good guy. Thanks greatly for your contribution to Good Night, Paul especially figuring out those last external links. There's a lot to learn for me on these wiki articles. T —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjt48 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure. The easiest way to learn how to do things on wiki is to open up the edit page and look at how others have done it before! Best wishes Markhh (talk) 21:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Harryl Northupwikipedia.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Harryl Northupwikipedia.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Northup

Thanks for the message. Actually you almost had it right -- the error was a typo in the opening ref tag which you had as <re> instead of <ref>. I prefer to use {{Reflist}} instead of <references/> but they accomplish the same end. – ukexpat (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you are deleting the external link to IMDB - it is perfectly acceptable to use IMDB as an external link and I would guess that 99.99% of actor/actress bios have such link. I am putting it back. – ukexpat (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the fact that the actor does not want the IMDB link is not the issue. The link is in accordance with Wikipedia policy so it stays in. No one owns articles on Wikipedia. – ukexpat (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The IMDB link shouldn't change over time -- I will keep an eye on it. On the question of the image, I suspect it was deleted because it did not have an appropriate license attached to it. If Mr Northup owns the copyright to it, he should send an e-mail as described in WP:IOWN and the folks who admin that system will take care of it. – ukexpat (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henry Graham Dakyns

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Henry Graham Dakyns, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability has not been established

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan2 (talk) 15:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

== Stop deleting my contribution

{{Help me}} There's a non-user page person 76.5.42.243 who keeps deleting my contribution to the wiki article on Billy Collins and the person doesn't give a real good reason to delete it. I tried to discussed the matter with her on the discussion page without results. She accuses me of "plugging" or "hitching" with my verifiable fact as you can see with the history of this article. She acts as though she owns the article and read the motives of others who contribute to the article. I don't wish to be dragged into picayunish and faulty rationale of deleting my factual insertion. What can I do to smooth out this conflict of interest in such a specialize field as American Poetry? Pjt48 (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed the dispute at 3O to request a third opinion. It'd be best to not revert any further before consensus has been reached on the talk page. Also do keep in mind that anonymous editors are just as welcome as registered editors. I will also notify WikiProject Poetry in an attempt to get more eyes on the article. Regards, decltype (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Ciment

A tag has been placed on Scott Ciment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pjt48. You have new messages at Davnor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for your note with respect to the above-captioned article. You'll find the deleted material at User:Pjt48/Sandbox. Incidentally, as I note above, it was User:Davnor who advised you with respect to the "hangon" tag, etc.; my efforts were restricted to deleting the article after I found that I agreed with its tag. If you have any questions about the policies involved in this decision, or anything else, I'll help if I can, just leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited Grace Perry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Jarman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Hitchcock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ren Shields, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Thanks for these moot editing points every bit helpsPjt48 (talk)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Barry Spacks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

independent.com/news/2014/jan/29/poet-barry-spacks-dies/,</ref> in [[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]]) is a prize-winning [[poet]] and [[novelist]]. He taught writing and literature at [[MIT]] from

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Thank you and I put the bracket on & now reference is neater Pjt48 (talk) 04:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Charles Plymell.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charles Plymell.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael C. Ford may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

s poems also include accompaniment of choral singers and musicians [[Angelo Moore]], Tommy Jordan ([[Geggy Tah]]. This album is another one produced by Harlan Steinberger at [[Hen House Studio]] in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Wright (poet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James McMichael. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC) I took care the ambiguity and thank you for bringing my attentionPjt48 (talk) 02:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of poets from the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[X. J. Kennedy]] (born 21 August 1929]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pjt48. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pjt48. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with Harry Northup?

Hello, Pjt48. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Harry Northup, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

You've made no secret of the fact that you've been editing on behalf of Harry Northup. Now we need to know what your relationship it. Thanks.

Doug Weller talk 18:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I know him for many years as a fellow Southern Californian poet. His notable long acting career is separate from my acquaintance with him as a poet. My editing of his career as an actor is all factual and non-bias. His entry deserves updates with facts but not critical analysis from me. I'm an infrequent wiki editor, so I'm here to counter any wiki article of faith. Pjt48 (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Pjt48[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pjt48. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of poets from the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Tate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hen House Studio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hen House Studio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hen House Studio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]