User talk:Ricky@36

Barnstar award

		The Business and Economics Barnstar
		I, Snake66, award you Ricky@36 with this barnstar to commemorate your excellent commitment to creating and improving many, many Chinese company and business related-articles. Keep it up! Snake66 (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Tips on editing

Hi Ricky. Thank you for your enthusiasm and your hard work. I hope that the fate of the HK housing estates articles can be resolved soon. Here are a few points that could help you in editing. Good editing contributes to the quality of your articles, and of course of Wikipedia in general. My points are more specifically related to what I have seen in your articles:

Avoid overlinking. Dates in estates articles do not need to be linked. That would be useful in the case of historical events, but linking dates in general does not add value. There are even bots running across Wikipedia to delete these links. Also, avoid linking general common words unless they add something to the value of the article. You can also have a look at Wikipedia:Linking.
Group subjects. As you have noticed, many people disagree with the over-creation of articles. One reason is that when a topic is split into too many separate articles, then the overview is lost. In many cases, a general article is written, and if some part become very large, then a separate article may be written. For instance I believe that an article could at this stage cover all the designs of public housing estates. We may need separate aricles for Old Slab, Single H and Twin Tower, but probably not now. The job can be done by putting the information in a table with pictures, so that readers can at the same time have an overview of the topic. If these articles are merged into one single article, then their title can redirect to the new general article.
Sources. Providing good sources enhances the value of the articles and allows reader to further their research about a topic by looking at other websites. What makes a "good source" is a complex topic, as you have noticed, but I would say that a source that simply mentions the name of the estate is not a good one. Also, websites like wikimapia, which are wikis, are not valuable sources: it would be like citing other pages of Wikipedia as your source. In this respect, I would agree with the deletion of some of your sources by User:Unschool. Not appropriate sources cast doubt about the purpose of the editor and decrease the credibility and perception of notability of the article. I believe that Government sources are useful, because they usually contain a lot of information. What other people would like to see are additional sources which say something of interest about the estate.
Tag your articles as "stub" when they need to. A stub notice is a signal that an article maybe has potential to be developped.
Link your articles to the WikiProject Hong Kong, so that they are included in a broader project, rather then are isolated. Simply add {{wikiProject Hong Kong}} to the talk page of the article.
"public housing estate" is a general term, not only applicable to Hong Kong. I have changed the title of the article to Public housing in Hong Kong. Public housing estate now redirects there. I have started to change all the links to "Public housing estate" into links to "Public housing in Hong Kong", and I will eventually redirect "public housing estate" to the general article "Public housing". So I suggest that you rather write this way: "Shek Kip Mei Estate is the first [[Public housing in Hong Kong|public housing estate]] in Hong Kong", rather than "Shek Kip Mei Estate is the first [[public housing estate]] in Hong Kong".

The outcome of the whole discussion might be that several estates will end up being merged, maybe in the form of tables, and I do not completely disagree with that. As long as your articles are informative and provide sources, I believe that a good part of the material that they contain will be kept in some form. If you have decided to stop creating new articles for the moment, maybe you could use this time to improve the existing ones. Finally, remember to assume good faith when interacting with others. I hope this helps. olivier (talk) 10:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Housing estates in Kwun Tong

Hi Ricky, I noticed the good word you are doing in merging the articles. I just wanted to ask you if there are any particular reasons you decided to keep and Yau Lai Estate alive – there is nothing in the article which makes me believe it notable in any way? The old Yau Tong Estate may have a claim to notability because of its history, but again the case is not made; the new one is completely fails WP:N in my view. Also, I would enquire as to the logic of creating a new article for Public housing estates in Sze Shun? I suggest that we merged the contents to Shun Lee in the same way I merged Tui Min Hoi Chuen and ‎Lakeside Garden to Sai Kung Town#Public housing, and also Sha Tau Kok Chuen to Sha Tau Kok. Ohconfucius (talk) 01:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this. I know that you are passionate about housing estates, but I would suggest that you did not continue creating articles with dubious claims to notability, which Kai Yip certainly appears to be. You might consider creating and writing directly into the Public housing estates in Kwun Tong article (or whatever sub-area) instead... Ohconfucius (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links

I noticed that you have been reinserting interwiki links into the product of mergers. However, WP:INTER states that there should only be one link to a wiki of another language in each article. Therefore, I am removing the excess ones you placed at Cheung Sha Wan and Shau Kei Wan, for example. In order that the Chinese interwiki links land on the correct article, I have placed the chinese interwiki links on the redirect pages like here and here Ohconfucius (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The interwiki links we have been placing on the redirects have been creating havoc due to the way the interwiki bots work. The bot acting on the Chinese article sees the final destination (ie 'Public housing estates in Foo') and not the redirect, and replaces the interwiki link with one to the final destination. The same bot acting in en:WP, seeing the new interwiki link on the Chinese article, places a bunch of interwikis on the final destination. FYI, I am trying to work out a solution with the bot operator here. Ohconfucius (talk) 14:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Public housing estates in Kwun Tong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong public housing articles

		The Original Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar to Ricky@36 in recognition of his passion, dedication, and cooperation in the maintenance of this series of articles. Ohconfucius (talk) 01:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More deletions by ignorant foreigners

Be careful that some ignorant foreigners are trying to delete more Hong Kong housing articles. (an example) They keep using the same stupid reason over and over -- "Oh...this housing estate is not notable." This is dumb. Anything that they have never heard of is "not notable". If you have some free time, please try to do something about it. Thanks. - Alan (talk) 04:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alanmak, please refrain from personal attacks. We had this discussion a month ago at WPHK. It was decided that most public estates were lacking in notability. The very same rationale applies to private estates, except that the rich developers in the colony have tons of money to throw at the press. We can take the discussion there also, if you prefer. I believe most of them will end up getting deleted, or at best merged per WP:LOCAL. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My finger slipped, apparently... but was caught!

Greetings-- I wanted to let you know I very brainlessly must have hit the wrong article off your contributions list for a CSD, before noticing it was the one you were looking to have deleted, and that it was the normal CSD and not a PROD. My Huggle eyes must be blurry this late. I'm soooooooooooo sorry, and I had it reverted in less than 5 seconds. Please let me know if you have any troubles, but it seems you have a guardian angel admin already? Better than I could be even when I'm perfect :) ♪ daTheisen (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Future railway stations

Re your contributions to Category:Future railway stations, I have tried to move similar articles to a subcategory (here Category:Future railway stations in China as the category by country also links into categories for Future public transportation in China and Railway Stations in the PRC. But you are certainly busy keeping abreast of all the new lines in China Hugo999 (talk) 01:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ricky@36! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 193 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Yang Guoqiang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kingboard.gif

is in the public domain, see {{pd-textlogo}}. Cheers, • ɔ ʃ → 14:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Central-owned enterprise of the People's Republic of China

Category:Central-owned enterprise of the People's Republic of China, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.--Mike Selinker (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hometroopers.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hometroopers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Cantonese

Hello Ricky,

I'm recently working on the new article "Regional differences in the Chinese language." Since you're also from Hong Kong, I think you'll be able to make lots of good contributions to this new article. Could you please give some input? :-)

Thanks,

Alan (talk) 00:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Guangfo Metro

Template:Guangfo Metro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:25, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Overlinking to this level is just excessive. I found that it was simply quicker for me to completely rewrite the text instead of attempting to conduct a surgery to remove the brackets. Please do not repeat this... --HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HXL, I have made some further changes to the article, which I would humbly call "improvements". I hope they will be to your liking. olivier (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wonderland Villas

The article Wonderland Villas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Housing estate or block(s) of flats that gives no indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Links to Temptation.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Links to Temptation.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Nanshan District

Category:Nanshan District, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 23:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Longhua Station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Longhua Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 19:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Longhua Station

A tag has been placed on Longhua Station, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page qualifies for speedy deletion because it does not provide enough context nor encyclopedic content

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 19:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Longhua Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Longhua Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longhua Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 19:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allway Gardens

The article Allway Gardens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belvedere Garden

The article Belvedere Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beverly Hill (Hong Kong)

The article Beverly Hill (Hong Kong) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with substantial content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Beverly Hills

The article The Beverly Hills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with substantial sources. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Cairnhill

The article The Cairnhill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chelsea Court

The article Chelsea Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Cliveden

The article The Cliveden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of East Point City

The article East Point City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Florient Rise

The article Florient Rise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Public housing estates in Diamond Hill

The article Public housing estates in Diamond Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Waterfront

The article Grand Waterfront has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Grandiose

The article The Grandiose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. Only one independent reference with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hampton Place

The article Hampton Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HK housing estates articles

Your input would be useful at the discussion that I have started on the topic, and where I have given some background. Plase see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Thank you. olivier (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AuChakMun.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AuChakMun.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ta Shui Wan Ferry Pier

The article Ta Shui Wan Ferry Pier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable pier as there isn't sufficient coverage in independent & reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 13:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kam Fung Garden

The article Kam Fung Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Two-year-old article with one reference (broken, apparently to a real estate listing) and two lines of text. interwiki article also has a link to the local public transport timetable, but nothing else in the way of obvious references as far as I can tell.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sinohotels.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sinohotels.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estimated results improvement

The article Estimated results improvement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This term does not appear to be supported by reliable sources. See wp:NEO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 05:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

I hope you like it, thank you! diasimon2003 (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Callable Bull/Bear Contracts issued in Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Category:Callable Bull/Bear Contracts issued in Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request: Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇)

Hi, I'm NeoBatfreak. The reason I'm writing is that I am requesting translation of the plot summary of Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇). If possible, please tranlate the summary and paste the translated text on my talk page. PLEASE? Thank you very much.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Wish and Switch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Dunn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fawcar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fawcar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Hippocratic Crush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raymond Cho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gacgroup.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gacgroup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingway.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kingway.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Value Partners (Hong Kong)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Value Partners (Hong Kong) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Value Partners (Hong Kong)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Value Partners (Hong Kong) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valuepartners.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valuepartners.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Super Mario Man 02:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valuepartners.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valuepartners.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Latitude

The article The Latitude has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building. Both refs (now link dead) point to developer, so it looks like there have never been any independent links.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Latitude for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Latitude is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Latitude until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hampton Place for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hampton Place is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampton Place until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cscl.png

A tag has been placed on File:Cscl.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Timothy Gu (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cscl.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cscl.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Timothy Gu (talk) 00:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Financialstreetholdings.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Financialstreetholdings.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chekiang Province, Republic of China for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chekiang Province, Republic of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chekiang Province, Republic of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ch (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucky Plaza, Hong Kong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucky Plaza, Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Plaza, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adrian Dakota (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Panda Place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panda Place, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 03:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panda Place for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panda Place is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panda Place until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 17:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Economic and Technological Development Zones

Category:Economic and Technological Development Zones, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greatfoodhall.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greatfoodhall.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 15:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taste.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Taste.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 15:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hthkhl.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hthkhl.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 08:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hutchisonharbourring.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hutchisonharbourring.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 05:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Sha Tin Heights Tunnel

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sha Tin Heights Tunnel , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 10:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kam Sheung Road

The article Kam Sheung Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sinopharm.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sinopharm.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dongfangelectric.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dongfangelectric.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Firstpacific.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Firstpacific.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miramarhotel.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miramarhotel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wai Wah Centre

The article Wai Wah Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am proposing deletion as I don't think that Wai Wah Centre is notable enough. Maybe should we redirect it to Private housing estates in Sha Tin District?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. pcfan500 (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Csr.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Csr.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Selling climax

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Selling climax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TL22 (talk) 02:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DCHfoodmart.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DCHfoodmart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Watsonswinecellar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Watsonswinecellar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Winglungbank.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Winglungbank.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haizhu Square listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haizhu Square. Since you had some involvement with the Haizhu Square redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Cwek (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 105

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 105

	Date: January 15
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 104 - next: Meetup 106

Olivier (talk) 16:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fareastorg.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fareastorg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skyworth.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skyworth.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SZSECI

Template:SZSECI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Matthew_hk t c 16:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wonderland Villas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wonderland Villas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderland Villas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FTSE China A50 Index

Template:FTSE China A50 Index has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Matthew_hk t c 17:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xaic.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xaic.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cable & Wireless - Hong Kong Telecom (logo, 1999-2008).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cable & Wireless - Hong Kong Telecom (logo, 1999-2008).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HKtelecom.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HKtelecom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crvanguard.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crvanguard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aqua Marine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aqua Marine. Since you had some involvement with the Aqua Marine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 19:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selling climax

The article Selling climax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned for nine years, never had any reliable sources (just a wiki dictionary entry and a long since removed encyclopedia.com entry), but seems to be fervently protected by a small number of people. Possible a regional or company term. Suggest deletion and/or merging into a similar article if it can be verified.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

sarysa (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poly Property

Poly Property, aka Poly Hong Kong, never called Haikang Investment. Please make fact check. Matthew_hk t c 05:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dahchonghong.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dahchonghong.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PCCW-HKT Telephone

Your addition to PCCW-HKT Telephone has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. https://web.archive.org/web/20050520090337/http://www.ofta.gov.hk:80/en/telecom_fact/milestones/main.html Matthew_hk t c 09:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

China Power International Development

The company is founded in 2004 not 1994. China Power Investment Corporation, the parent company, did not even found in 1994. Matthew_hk t c 14:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, China Hong Kong Power Development, a joint venture, is owned by "China Power International HOLDING" and it is clearly stated in the SCMP article. China Power International Holding is the PARENT COMPANY of China Power International Development not subsidiary. Matthew_hk t c 20:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SZSECI

Template:SZSECI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Matthew_hk t c 09:05, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Winglungbank 2009.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Winglungbank 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chow Tai Fook

It appeared that your content in Chow Tai Fook had factual error. Which Chow Tai Fook Enterprises is a private company, Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group is a listed company, and New World Development is owned by Chow Tai Fook Enterprises not Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group. Matthew hk (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Watsonspersonalcarestores.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Watsonspersonalcarestores.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allway Gardens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allway Gardens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allway Gardens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. viz ✦ 17:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yoho Town for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoho Town is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoho Town until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. viz ✦ 05:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunevision.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunevision.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sinotruk

If you are back, please kindly fact check all your creation. Yet another error was located in Sinotruk (Hong Kong). The prospectus explicitly stated the foundation year is 2007, not your hoax value 2004. Matthew hk (talk) 06:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of China-based financial stocks in Hong Kong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China-based financial stocks in Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China-based financial stocks in Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew hk (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ming An Holdings

Not sure how many hoax info i will be discover from your work, if you are back, please consider to add citation to all of your content and correct all the hoax and error from misreading source material (or just calling random stuff from unreliable memory). Ming An Holdings did not have reinsurance business despite Ming An Insurance was the shareholder of China International Reinsurance (now Taiping Reinsurance), but before the listing of Ming An Holdings and China Insurance International Holdings, China International Reinsurance is 100% owned by China Insurance International Holdings already. Unless you dig out Ming An had reinsurance brokerage business, but it still not the same as reinsurance . Matthew hk (talk) 11:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xingyecopper.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xingyecopper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:China Shipping Group has been nominated for discussion

Category:China Shipping Group has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. CartleR255 (talk) 15:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:COSCO has been nominated for renaming

Category:COSCO has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hang Seng China-Affiliated Corporations Index

Template:Hang Seng China-Affiliated Corporations Index has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Matthew hk (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wangwang.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wangwang.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong)

The article Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence or claim of notability. A BEFORE turns up only listings to confirm it exists. Nothing to meet WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 15:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wangwang.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wangwang.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gourmet (supermarket) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gourmet (supermarket) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 07:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 07:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingfook.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kingfook.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 11:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harbour Plaza Hotel Management (International) Limited (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harbour Plaza Hotel Management (International) Limited (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 20:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hkferry.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hkferry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 20:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tin Ching Estate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tin Ching Estate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Ching Estate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shun On Estate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shun On Estate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun On Estate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarioGom (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Nanzhou Passenger Station (metro)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nanzhou Passenger Station (metro) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 6#Nanzhou Passenger Station (metro) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ZandDev (msg) 12:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Luogang District

A tag has been placed on Category:Luogang District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Internationalbankofasia.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Internationalbankofasia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of King Fook Holdings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King Fook Holdings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Fook Holdings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NortonAngo (talk) 06:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lonking.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lonking.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Centaline logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centaline logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hendersoninvestment.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hendersoninvestment.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Towngaschina.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Towngaschina.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]