User talk:Rivatphil

Hi, Rivatphil, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.

Click here to respond to this message!

A tag has been placed on Daphney Sequeira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 06:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daphney Sequeira

You have recently re-created the article Daphney Sequeira, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. JuJube 10:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Central Travancore

An article that you have been involved in editing, Central Travancore, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Travancore. Thank you. Soman (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating deleted content in Kolath Family

This was a blatant repost of the deleted article Kolath. It has been speedy-deleted and protected. Please refrain from reposting deleted content on wikipedia. JERRY ^talk _contribs 05:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Politicians

I see you recently wrote at least three articles about Indian politicians. Please keep in mind our WP:Vverifiability policy and make sure that everything you enter in Wikipedia is accompanied by a reference that proves the information you added is true. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of T.M. Kamble

I have nominated T.M. Kamble, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.M. Kamble. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 10:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Thottappuzhassery

A tag has been placed on Thottappuzhassery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Laurent (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket associations

Hi. Regarding the articles you've just been creating, can I suggest you have a look at this article - Karnataka State Cricket Association - as it will give you some idea of the layout and content you should probably be using, rather than just cutting and pasting the same content into each article and just changing the name. Cheers. :-) CultureDrone (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop a second

And read the above comment. As it is, the articles you are adding are not formatted correctly, so we're going to have to go through and fix every one. If you would be willing to take some time and format them - we can help - it would be such a huge help to us. Thank you, Flying Toaster 11:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bingaram

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eugene Krabs (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Association Articles

Hi Rivatphil,

This is regarding your articles for Cricket Association's of different states of India, however you have not mentioned any references. Moreover all the articles are same just names are changed. Please quote references in articles. Oniongas (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Municipalities of Puducherry

I just noticed, Rivatphil, that you have created Municipalities of Puducherry by copying the content of Puducherry Municipal Council. May I ask what your intention is? I assume that you do not feel a need for two identical articles. If there is a need for an article name change, I will be happy to help out. Tim Ross (talk) 10:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Report on the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Kerala

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Report on the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Kerala, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of A Report on the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Kerala

I have nominated A Report on the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Kerala, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Report on the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Kerala. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala ARs

I have nominated all these articles for deletion. They are branches on the article Proposed changes in administration of Kerala and seem to be original research.Porturology (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of APHLC

A tag has been placed on APHLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of S.C. Marak

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article S.C. Marak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced, non-notable, minimal content

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of D.D. Pugh

A tag has been placed on D.D. Pugh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of W.A. Sangma

A tag has been placed on W.A. Sangma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of VasaiRoad

The article VasaiRoad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Vasai Road exists as a redirect to Vasai where significant sourced content exists; nothing to merge from here. Also a redirect isn't necessary as the two variations of the name are already the title/redirect of the current page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 05:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party Reorganization Centre of India (Marxist-Leninist)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Communist Party Reorganization Centre of India (Marxist-Leninist), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Central Team. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Punjab Communist Marxist Party

An article that you have been involved in editing, Punjab Communist Marxist Party, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Communist Marxist Party. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Soman (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some general comments

Since you spend a lot of time at this website, it might be good if you familiarise yourself a little bit more about the policies and habits of wikipedia.

First of all, please ensure verifiability. Include <ref></ref> tags with the link to the online article where you found something you wish to include in an article.
Secondly, stunts like these [1] are a dead end. Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. See WP:COI.
More info can be found at WP:MOS.

--Soman (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Naxal/Maoist outfits lists

An article that you have been involved in editing, Naxal/Maoist outfits lists, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naxal/Maoist outfits lists. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Soman (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of more moderate sector of Naxal/Maoist outfits

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of more moderate sector of Naxal/Maoist outfits. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naxal/Maoist outfits lists. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Peoples Democratic Party (Abdul Nasser Maudhany). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peoples Democratic Party (Abdul Nasser Maudhany)

The article Peoples Democratic Party (Abdul Nasser Maudhany) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a fork of People's Democratic Party (India)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Soman (talk) 11:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rivatphil! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 12 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 225 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

K. P. Dhanapalan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
M. K. Raghavan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
P.T Thomas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Samir Putatundu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wahengbam Nipamacha Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joseph. M. Puthussery - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
M.P. George - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Johnny Nellore - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
B.C. Kamble - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
T.M. Kamble - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Rajendra Gavai

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Pandakkal. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riva Philip

The article Riva Philip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, non-notable per WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO, no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, WP:Autobiography, orphan.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Left and Peoples Alliance

A tag has been placed on Left and Peoples Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been adding unsourced content to numerous articles and have been ip socking to revert removals of such content; please stop it. —SpacemanSpiff 04:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samir Putatundu

The article Samir Putatundu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I've tried a fair bit to see if I can show notability for the subject. However, I've only found trivial mentions and he's a senior person in a small party, not an elected official. Doesn't meet WP:Politician or WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 08:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Malayalam Superstars

I have nominated Malayalam Superstars, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malayalam Superstars. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sreejith K (talk) 18:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2008-09

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2008-09 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Duncan^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 19:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2007-08

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2007-08, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Coolug (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2006-07

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2006-07 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Coolug (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2002-03

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2002-03 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^{converse | contribs} 19:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2005-06

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2005-06 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^{converse | contribs} 19:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore

Ignore the above warnings. There is plenty of context. Marcus Qwertyus 19:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2004-05

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2004-05 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Coolug (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2006-07

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gobbleswoggler (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Creation

Based on these new articles you are creating,you may want to sort out the format before you submit the article.Gobbleswoggler (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Trophy 2004-05

A tag has been placed on Santosh Trophy 2004-05 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace

Please do not create any more of these silly articles. First create them in your userspace and then get approval for them. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Gilbert Islands

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Southern Gilbert Islands, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Gilbert Islands. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Southern Gilbert Islands

Hello, apologies about tagging for speedy deletion, I have redirected the article to Gilbert Islands. Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 09:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Kerala Congress leaders

The article List of Kerala Congress leaders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significance of a separate article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Anish Viswa 12:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GILO A&E⇑ 11:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam

It may be a beautiful place, but your article read just like an advertisement. More importantly, it was a copyright violation of http://www.polama.com/holidayDetails.jsp?holiday_id=2887. You must not introduce copyright text into Wikipedia. See WP:COPYVIO. Peridon (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.scenictourism.com/State2-Kerala-District-Kottayam-Destination-Pallickathodu-Attraction-Aruvikkuzhi%20Waterfalls-162.aspx. As a copyright violation, Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Aruvikkuzhi Kottayam District, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vamuzo Phesao

The article Vamuzo Phesao has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of P. Shilu Ao

The article P. Shilu Ao has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of T.N. Angami

The article T.N. Angami has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vizol Angami

The article Vizol Angami has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Bosco Jasokie

The article John Bosco Jasokie has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Longjam Thambou Singh

The article Longjam Thambou Singh has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raj Kumar Ranbir Singh

The article Raj Kumar Ranbir Singh has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raj Kumar Jaichandra Singh

The article Raj Kumar Jaichandra Singh has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Alimuddin

The article Mohammed Alimuddin has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 09:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhim Bahadur Gurung

The article Bhim Bahadur Gurung has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sanchaman Limboo

The article Sanchaman Limboo has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wilfred D'Souza

The article Wilfred D'Souza has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr. Luis Proto Barbosa

The article Dr. Luis Proto Barbosa has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ravi S. Naik

The article Ravi S. Naik has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luizinho Faleiro

The article Luizinho Faleiro has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of R.C. Kak

The article R.C. Kak has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomo Riba

The article Tomo Riba has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jogendra Nath Hazarika

The article Jogendra Nath Hazarika has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kesab Chandra Gogoi

The article Kesab Chandra Gogoi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohendra Mohan Choudhury

The article Mohendra Mohan Choudhury has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bishnu Ram Medhi

The article Bishnu Ram Medhi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:33, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhumidhar Barman

The article Bhumidhar Barman has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of E.K. Mawlong

The article E.K. Mawlong has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr. F.A. Khonglam

The article Dr. F.A. Khonglam has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Santhosh Pandit

The article Santhosh Pandit has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cind.amuse 13:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlas Ramachandran

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Atlas Ramachandran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krishnanum Radhayum (2011 film)

The article Krishnanum Radhayum (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notablility requirements of WP:MOVIE, and doing a Google News search of articles about the movie produced no results.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Creation of unsourced WP:BLPs after warnings.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 18:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of K. Narayana Kurup

The article K. Narayana Kurup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 12:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Lai people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pawi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al Gharbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 02:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 05:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of East Asia & Pacific Confederation Nations based on FIFA Ranking

The article List of East Asia & Pacific Confederation Nations based on FIFA Ranking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The FIFA ranking constantly changes, so a sublist of countries based on that ranking is not stable or useful for an encyclopedia. Also WP:NOTSTATS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Fram (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of West & Central Asia Confederation Nations based on FIFA Ranking

The article List of West & Central Asia Confederation Nations based on FIFA Ranking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The FIFA ranking is not a stable thing, so this list is not a stable or useful encyclopedic grouping (WP:NOTSTATS). Furthermore, this grouping of countries is not a normal grouping as used by FIFA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Fram (talk) 09:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AFC-OFC Reorganization Proposal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AFC-OFC Reorganization Proposal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC-OFC Reorganization Proposal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soman (talk) 10:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Euyakim Mar Coorilos

Hello, Rivatphil, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Euyakim Mar Coorilos, appears to be directly copied from http://marthoma.in/rt-rev-dr-euyakim-mar-coorilos-episcopa. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Euyakim Mar Coorilos if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geevarghese Mar Athanasius

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geevarghese Mar Athanasius, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://marthoma.in/rt-rev-geevarghese-mar-athanasius-episcopa.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geevarhese Mar Theodosius

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geevarhese Mar Theodosius, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://marthoma.in/rt-rev-dr-geevarghese-mar-theodosius-episcopa.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geevarghese Mar Theodosius

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geevarghese Mar Theodosius, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://marthoma.in/rt-rev-dr-geevarghese-mar-theodosius-episcopa.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Mar Barnabas

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph Mar Barnabas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jerusalemmarthomachurchperumpetty.com/church/our-bishops/rt-rev-joseph-mar-barnabas/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mar Timotheos

Hello, Rivatphil, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Thomas Mar Timotheos, appears to be directly copied from http://www.jerusalemmarthomachurchperumpetty.com/church/our-bishops/rt-rev-thomas-mar-timotheos-episcopa/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Thomas Mar Timotheos if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Mar Philoxenos

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Mar Philoxenos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jerusalemmarthomachurchperumpetty.com/church/our-bishops/rt-rev-dr-isaac-mar-philoxenos/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Mar Paulos

Hello, Rivatphil, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Abraham Mar Paulos, appears to be directly copied from http://www.mtcjpr.org/?page_id=25. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Abraham Mar Paulos if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gregorios Mar Stephanos

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gregorios Mar Stephanos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://kmdiocese.marthoma.in/content/rt-rev-gregorios-mar-stephanos-0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mar Theethos

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thomas Mar Theethos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://mumbaidiocese.marthoma.in/administration.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 12:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Mar Athanasius

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Mar Athanasius, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 『Woona』_{Dear Celestia...} 13:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VERY repetitive creation of copyright-infringing articles 『Woona』_{Dear Celestia...} 13:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your repeated copyright violations, I have opened a contributor copyright investigation into your edits at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Rivatphil. MER-C 05:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Note

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add material to Wikipedia that is in violation of Wikipedia's very strict policy on copyright violations. You have been warned many times about this, but you have chosen to ignore those warnings. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

----Shirt58 (talk) 10:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Church of India

The article Church of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no references to indicate that this is more than an idea. A web search does not turn up any likely appearing reliable sources. The editor who started this page was blocked a few days after writing it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike talk 04:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Various Communist/Leftist Parties in India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Various Communist/Leftist Parties in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Various Communist/Leftist Parties in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Non-Municipal Census Towns in Kerala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-Municipal Census Towns in Kerala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Municipal Census Towns in Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. naveenpf (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yangmaso Shaiza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yangmaso Shaiza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yangmaso Shaiza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 18:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CPI(M-L) Central Committee 1970

The article CPI(M-L) Central Committee 1970 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, non notable committee list of a particular year

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Konni-Thazham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konni-Thazham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konni-Thazham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 10:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thottappuzhassery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thottappuzhassery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thottappuzhassery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 10:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eda Nadu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eda Nadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eda Nadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 10:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pathirapally for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pathirapally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathirapally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 10:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]