Jump to content

User talk:Seresin/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks.
Archives

Until August 2007 — September 2007
October 2007 — November 2007
December 2007 — January 2008
February 2008 — March 2008
April 2008 — May 2008
June 2008 — July 2008
August 2008 — September 2008
October 2008 — November 2008
December 2008 — January 2009
February 2009 — March 2009
April 2009 — May 2009
June 2009 — July 2009
August 2009 — September 2009
October 2009 — November 2009 December 2009 — January 2010
February 2010 — March 2010
April 2010 — May 2010
June 2010 — to June 2013
to November 2014

Help desk

Regarding your question, I can't find any problem. Your talk page is where it ought to be, and your archive is where it ought to be.

Also, I'm pretty sure that you can have a local copy of MediaWiki. Just install all of the required software on your machine or one on your network. WODUP 20:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. For some reason it wasn't working for me. Thanks though. i said 20:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As for the local wiki, it says at mw:Installation that I need a web server, php versions etc. I don't have a web server and don't want to put it there. So what does that mean then? i said 20:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You'll need a server even if you only want to access it from your own computer through http://localhost. I was able to download, install, and run Apache on a PC that I wasn't using anymore. That part was really easy. I don't have any experience at all with database servers or PHP, though. WODUP 21:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So you were able to do a wiki on your own computer? i said 21:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No. I would've needed PHP and a database server. Maybe I'll do it some day, but I haven't yet. WODUP 21:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So I need those things to do it. This sounds like too much work. And the jargon...oh the jargon. i said 21:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's tough to have to learn all of those things at the same time. It's proabaly best to learn each program individually, then together with MediaWiki. If you do decide to try it, the folks on IRC in #mediawiki might be able to help. WODUP 21:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so. Thanks. 21:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:USURP

This is quite funny. I guess it can't interpret what's meant to not be signed. --Deskana (banana) 00:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too. That's actually the second time it's happened. It might be a good idea to opt out of the autosign there. Until that is decided, I'll just disable it on a case by case basis. i said 00:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Autosign can be pretty useful if someone requests a rename but forgets to sign- it prevents us having to check the page history. --Deskana (banana) 01:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I thought so. I'll just use !nosign!. i said 01:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am fully satisfied with this bot. I dont understand why people would opt out of this. i said 05:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


30 Days?

Where's this 30 days thing coming from? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the page. i said 00:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting of Swedish Americans

Per suggestions to relist separately, Scandinavian American lists are up again separately: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Norwegian Americans. Bulldog123 06:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hi I, I have given you a (short, admittedly) review at your editor review. Cheers -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Thanks much! i said 22:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation of nick

Hi ... I just thought I'd let you know that I'm female, and if you could change your comment in my request to usurp User:Neskaya to reflect that I am a she, that'd be appreciated. I know it's a little silly of me to ask you that, but I would still appreciate it if you did. I requested it because I've recently been nominated for adminship on Wiktionary and this was suggested to me a bit before that happened. Thanks much. --Leitzan talk 03:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome!

And an answer to User:I/Questions. You could probably run it on your PC if you installed PHP5 and MySQL onto your computer. Not sure which OS you're running, so can't really say more. Check out this page: [1] for PHP and MySQL here [2]. Backsigns 00:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silly me. I figured it out a few days ago (after much wailing and gnashing of teeth) So I have removed the question. Thanks for answering though. And you're welcome for the welcome. i said 00:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Hello Seresin, Isis4563 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Isis4563 02:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Badger

One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Seven, Eight, Nine... Hrmm... I'm sure I missed a few, lol. Ariel♥Gold 04:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, [3] lol. Not that all of those are the same person, but a good example Riana just posted. Ariel♥Gold 04:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ariel, that comment was kinda lame. Let me improve it for you.
It's a Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger MUSHROOM MUSHROOM! --lucid 04:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. That made me laugh i said 04:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hee hee, thank you Lucid! You're right, that's much better! Ariel♥Gold 04:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dude

Fuck yourself, this guy is real and should definitely have a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbins5 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:He may be real, but he is not notable. I advise you to become familiar with policy before editing and creating pages. Also, do not remove tags from pages you have created yourself. Instead, use {{hangon}} and explain your reasoning on the talk page.

I apologize. He, unfortunately, does not qualify for speedy deletion, as he almost certainly has automatic notability. On initial reading I though he was a sophomore at a high school, which does not grant him the automatic notability. Thus, I tagged it for CSD. He, apparently is a mildly notable football player, and would have to go to AfD to be deleted. Again, I'm sorry. i said 07:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, that kind of incivility and rudeness is never warranted. Please remember WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Soryy for being a dick...that was just annoying me. No harm done :) --Robbins5 07:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok. No harm done. i said 07:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

3RR doesn't apply to reverting obvious or blatant vandalism, as removing tags is. You don't need to worry about 3RR in situations like that, for future reference --lucid 07:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, yes. But my tagging was in error. i said 07:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirect#Do_not_change_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken says "The primary reason for changing a working redirect is if the link displays incorrectly in its current form either because the prose does not scan well, the redirect is a misspelling or the real page simply has a better name." Presumably whoever renamed "Kismet (program)" to "Kismet (software)" thought the latter was a better name (and, given that the convention for ambiguous names appears to be to add "(software)" to the name of the page for the software with the given name, I tend to agree with that person). Also, I think it makes more sense for a disambiguation page - which Kismet, that being the page whose change you noted, is - to refer to the specific pages by their real name. Guy Harris 19:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Hero

Thank you! I was busy reverting the other pages he blanked, like 6 in a matter of seconds. lol. Ariel♥Gold 02:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Déjà vu anybody? Lol. i said 02:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hee hee, it is about that time of night, isn't it? Hrmmm... lol. Ariel♥Gold 02:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Better get an admin who can rangeblock. i said 02:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LOL! Hopefully it won't come to that ~*Crosses fingers*~ Ariel♥Gold 02:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your anti-vandalism effort. Keep up the good work and I shall see you around often! :) All the best, PeaceNT 07:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! i said 07:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Actually, check this conversation out. That's what I initially thought as well, but Misza (admin) (last post on that thread) explained that when an active vandal or other offender removes them, that is considered vandalism, and we have every right to revert. They are there to serve as a record for admins, and for other editors who need to know what level of warning the user has received. Most especially for shared IPs, it is important that they aren't removed. And while official policy does not stop users from removing comments from their own talk pages, "archiving is preferred". So, technically they can, but generally, for active vandals, the comments will be reverted. For instance, I just saw a previous offender remove warnings from November of 2006, and I did nothing, because that's fine. But when we get someone from a shared IP blanking the page of 30+ warnings/blocks, or an active vandal who you need to know what level warning they've had recently, yes, we can revert those, and that is why I carefully worded that notice to say "most likely will get reverted", and I don't say it is a policy, but that it is considered to be vandalism. I don't do it unless they're active, though, so no worries! Ariel♥Gold 07:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, like it says, you can remove them, but for active vandals, the chances are they'll be reverted, as they're considered a "record of recent events" and need to be on the page for people to refer to in order to take appropriate actions. But for old ones, sure they can junk them all, doesn't matter (except shared IPs, from what I've seen). Not a huge deal, but maybe I'll think about re-wording my notice again. Ariel♥Gold 07:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Akatsuki members

The List of Akatsuki members AfD you participated in has been brought to deletion review here. Please take a look if you're interested. — xDanielx T/C 19:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! What a welcome!

I had just logged in, cleared the tag and was trawling through the episode review pages to see what had happened while I've been away. Thanks for the tip. Also, it's nice to be welcomed back... six weeks without Wikipedia and I was feeling a bit annonymous... :) Gwinva 23:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*wipes egg from chin*

Thanks for catching that at WP:RFCN. Rather than blame the obvious party, me, I choose rather to blame whoever removed the blank line. Nah. It was me. ;) Flyguy649 talk contribs 06:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. BTW, good luck on your RFA. i said 06:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I also made the hidden message more noticeable. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 14:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


RE: My rename

How has it been controversial? —MC 01:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. —MC 01:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'm going to do it anyway because I don't want anyone to link me to that name anymore. —MC 17:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Save the trivia

I moved the page to here, although you may already know this, considering you nominated my page for deletion. >:( Cheers. --Alien joe 21:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for helping me warn 72.11.49.208, the IP who vandalised Book 3 (Inheritance Trilogy).--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 00:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(X)HTML

Creating a redirect to XHTML#Relationship_to_HTML would not be inconsistent with the deletion - which does not preclude something being created at the space only a recreation of what used to be there. I also noted that this was suggested by the nominator but there wasn't any real consensus to move that way so I left it to the editors - you, the nominator, or any of the gazillions of others - to be WP:BOLD and do it. Cheers, Carlossuarez46 04:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It worked

You plan of deleting my save the trivia page worked. Now you can go home and realized that you ended my career. Tell everybody that was involved in this that I quit Wikipedia. >:( Cheers. --Alien joe 19:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport (software)

PLEASE REVIEW I am leaving you this message because you have participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport (software) I have reduced the Sport (software) article to a stub with one valid assertion of notability which can be verified by a reliable source and is properly cited. From digging through the sources that Mr. Badger provided, I have concluded that the software has just made it under the wire to qualify as notable because it was the subject of a lecture at an international symposium of SmallTalk programmers about a week ago. I have tagged the article for Wikipedia:WikiProject_Free_Software and I have posted a note about the article on their TO-DO list. The article is not what Mr. Badger envisioned, but it might be worth keeping now. Mr. Badger has had many Wikipedians drill into his head warnings about the problems with his conflict of interest and unfamiliarity with Wikipedia standards and practices, and from direct email correspondence with him I am sure he will comply. Please let me know what you think of these changes. Thanks very much. OfficeGirl 00:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to suggestion

Thanks for suggesting to me about signing up for Twinkle. I considered it before, however, I beleive it doesn't work on IE which is what I'm using. (Just to reply to your suggestion.) Thanks again though.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 04:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your NPWatcher application

Dear I,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf 00:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles nominated for deletion

Just so you know, there have been several attempted mass deletions and mergers lately, and they have run into a lot of opposition; not because they have any arguments, but because they don't want them deleted, the deletions end without any consensus. I am doing this one at a time to make specific arguments they cannot refute. But please, feel free to do what you are doing, I will likely support it, but I am going to continue with my strategy. Judgesurreal777 06:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest you co-ordinate your efforts with other efforts that are currently on-going. I very much like and support your list, and should perhaps combine it with the other one for a combined attack :) Judgesurreal777 21:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the other discussion

User:Guest9999/Harry Potter articles that may - in my opinion - not meet with WP:NN Judgesurreal777 21:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter Notability

Good to know that other people think that this is an issue that should be dealt with. At the moment I think that the ongoing discussion at the Harry Potter Wikiproject seems to be yielding results I think that there would be the best place to put forward your proposal - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Harry Potter/Notability. [[Guest9999 12:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

I'm back!

I am out of retiremet. Sorry if I got hard on you about nominating my page. --Alien joe 19:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boo!

Hello dear, I replied to the WT:RFCN discussion, and just wanted to be sure you realize I'm not disagreeing with you, or saying you're wrong, but that in some situations, history is helpful. I just wanted to clear that up, because I guess I didn't do a good job of explaining what I was thinking previous to your edit, as my brain occasionally goes faster than my fingers, lol. I knew what I meant, though, does that count? Ariel♥Gold 03:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee hee, well, I remember some, but I also have a page I use for my "cheatsheet", with multiple templates, links, references, etc., so I have them all there, as well, since my memory isn't always unfailing. . Ariel♥Gold 04:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks again for your support at my RFA. I'm sure we'll keep bumping into each other at RFCN. Let me know if I can help you out with anything. Cheers!! Flyguy649 talk contribs 20:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username

I've posted a message to that editor's talk page. It sounds initially as though the editor is reluctant to change names, but I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to take it to WP:RFCN. I'm able to see the name, but if you're not, that means there is an issue with at least some editors not being able to, which I see as being potentially problematic. This would fall under the category of non-latin usernames in WP:U, scripts of non-Latin languages (such as Arabic, Chinese, Greek, Japanese and others) are illegible to most other contributors of the English Wikipedia.. However, it doesn't say they have to change their names, so I'm not really sure what is normally done, since the editor does have a signature in English with "sunshine". Perhaps there are no real problems, I'd ask Flyguy, he knows a whole lot more about the historical actions associated with usernames. Sorry I'm not much help. Ariel♥Gold 03:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now four places for the conversation! Just thought I'd shake things up a bit, lol. Okay, no in reality it is because I'll just reply to your main concern. I would not worry that you can't see it, and I also would bet you're not the only one, you're just the only one that has noticed, this user has few contributions and has not run into many people, so I'm sure it is just a matter of time. I'm sure Flyguy can take care of it, but I think this user's desire to keep the name is a bit odd, I don't really understand it. The main issue I see, even with redirects, is the fact that someone can not type the name, when referring to the user in conversation, it would be impossible to type it or to type a shortcut to the user's page, without having to go there, and copy/paste it. That's just not a good situation if you ask me, but again, who am I to say? lol. ~*Shrug*~ I've said all I think I can contribute, so we'll just see I guess. Interesting situation, to say the least! Ariel♥Gold 04:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can we move all that conversation to the place where we are supposed to be talking about it then? I'm confused. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 05:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. WP:RFCN. It got very confusing there for a while. i said 05:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image stuff

I've got the impression that you're fairly schooled on image matters, recent policy, fair use and all that stuff.. correct me if I'm wrong. Anyway, as I said on Talk:Runescape, the fair use/deletion of images policy is bogus IMHO, and one of the reasons for me thinking this way is all these blurry, out-of-focus free images replacing quality photography on all the articles. Now, I understand why they need to be deleted in accordance with copyright and all of that, and I'm not going to interfere with that because of my bias, but I was wondering - is there a template that could be placed at the top of articles that says something to the effect of, "This image is crappy and needs to be replaced by a high-quality free or fair use image" (albeit worded more diplomatically)? Otherwise, is there need to create one, in your view? Maybe placing templates in articles with such photos would encourage editors to contact photographers, etc., in the acquisition of higher-quality images under Creative Commons licenses, or something like that. DeusExMachina 04:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No no, that's quite all right. Well, actually I was suggesting low-qual free images be replaced with higher-quality, equally free ones.. and putting the templates on the page would encourage this. I know we're supposed to encourage free images, but surely quality comes into account? Maybe a whole section could be set up (I don't know how) of budding photographers, etc., would see a list of those tagged articles, tagged by the "this image is crap and needs replacing with a better free one" template, and find a way of procuring said photo? Because in my opinion.. between the choice of a crappy free image and no image at all, it's an easy decision.. because having an amateurish photo as the lead picture, or even as a secondary picture, for an article severely disrupts the professionalism of this whole project, especially if Wikipedia is trying to shake off accusations of sloppiness. DeusExMachina 06:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message from alien joe

OK, thanks for welcoming me back. And sorry if I got hard on you about my page. Cheers. --Alien joe 21:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

The block log doesn't move. With really dodgy ones we either don't rename, or block them for 1 second with a blocking message giving their old username and a ref to the old block log. This is so you can't pretend to be new and innocent and yet be one off a one year block. Renames can be denied for any reason - there is no right to a rename. We have guidelines on when we generally do it but it's up to our discretion. How were we chosen? The first five (I think) were appointed at the end of 2003 (I think). I was one of that batch. I'm not sure of the grounds - it was that we were seen as safe pairs of hands I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Secretlondon (talk • contribs) 00:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArielGold and Phgao

Hey there, I. As you reverted User:Phgao's edit on ArielGold's talk page, I was wondering if you planned to let them know, as a courtesy. I think it was a good faith error, as they didn't just blank a large amount, they added a reply to her too. They might just not realise that they made the error, or that their reply is currently missing from the talk page. Kindest regards — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can guarantee it was 100% a mistake, and no need to tell Phgao about it. With my wonderful "family" here watching over things while I sleep, all is right, I've added the comment in and replied to it. I really would not want Phgao to feel bad, I've done some mistakes like that in the past, lol. And, I want to thank both of you, for being wonderful! No worries! Ariel♥Gold 06:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: RFCN

Okay that's fair enough, but what am I to do when username reports are (as they very often are) left on UAA with the comment "take to RFCN" ? UAA doesn't have space for the kind of discussion that goes about on RFCN, and the users barely respond.

I'm not talking back to you, I'm genuinely wanted to be told what to do :D SGGH speak! 00:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Air Fresheners

"air fresheners that had lost their scent": apparently, precisely the origin of the band's name. But not from anywhere citable... - Jmabel | Talk 00:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

I am retiring, but it has nothing to do with save the trivia. Cheers. --Alien joe 22:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding List of enemies in Doom 3

The reason that there is no discussion is that there is nothing to discuss, and nobody that actually wants to discuss the article's existence. People are only interested in discussing why a discussion should happen (one of the most inane thought processes on this site). Other than that, we have some WP:ILIKEITs on the side that have no intention of sticking around (a few anons and a some user that has been inactive for two years). Placing a discussion tag will do nothing but get the usual idling that places the article in limbo, and any time its redirected, someone is going to cite "no consensus" over and over (despite WP:NOT#GUIDE and WP:FICT being around). It's just one of those things that you kill, and keep on killing. TTN 00:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't take offense. . .

...but I rolled you back at RFCN because the user was actually notified (see User talk:Prisonbreak 4ever, it was just a poorly formatted RFCN. Into The Fray T/C 22:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fix

Thanks, I could not for the life of me remember the note template, but alas, it is takenote. We edit conflicted. Good catch. ;) Regards, Navou banter 02:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I had to go to RFCU and check the indicators box. So I can see why. :D — i said 02:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! — i said 22:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leetspeak

If there were a leetspeak barnstar, you'd be getting it. Laughing, Into The Fray T/C 04:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol thanks. I felt so nerdy when I actually corrected someone on leetspeek. O well =D — i said 04:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was painful.

†}-{3 l33t 8@/2₪$†@/2
u winzored thiz bcuz u roxors. Into The Fray T/C 04:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to amuse.  :) I can't even read what I wrote. I had to use Leet like a cypher book to translate what I wanted to say for the title. That took the last out of me. I'm off to bed. Cheers, Into The Fray T/C 05:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Translate for I! (And for me, too! lol) Ariel♥Gold 05:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It says The Leet Barstar- you win this because you rock. And I had to use an online translator to make my edit summary; I can read it, but can't write it. — i said 05:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Dear. Actually, if I understand the tense construction correctly, it says "You won this because you rock". I'll be filing an immediate request for mediation. Into The Fray T/C 13:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hee hee hee. Go check out Fray's talk page, lmao. (I know he has a great sense of humor, so no worries it will be taken wrong, and he can remove it if he wants to, but it's humorous, lol) Ariel♥Gold 05:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I tried to figure it out, but what's this referring to? What article did you fix? Ariel♥Gold 05:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This and this edit summary. — i said 05:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
lol, good job Mr. Translation! Ariel♥Gold 05:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch, it took me over 2 minutes to figure out what your reply said on Fray's page, lol. I don't think I have a future as a translator, ~*Sniffle*~ Ariel♥Gold 05:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

←Maybe it's because you're not a teenager(?); it might just be easier at this age . — i said 05:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll pretend I did not read that. :o) ~*Giggle*~ Ariel♥Gold 05:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I read it. And, God knows, it made me feel old just to write it. :D Cheers, Into The Fray T/C 13:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is possibly the funniest thing I've seen all week! (By the way, I'm a teenager and I couldn't understand much of that... and I'm a geek! Oh dear me!) Love, Neranei (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Seresin/Archive_2&oldid=1259620684"