User talk:Sorland

Welcome!

Hello, Sorland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Your article Bruna Erhardt has been deleted because it does not contain any indication of why she is notable. If you wish to recreate the article you should give an account of her main achievements. Please see this page to see what kind of achievements make someone worth an encyclopedia article. DJ Clayworth 17:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was the sort of information we needed. DJ Clayworth 18:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Veruschka

Hi. I have deleted the article Veruschka you have created because it appears an identical copy of http://poll.imdb.com/name/nm0902610/bio

Another problem with the version of the article you posted is that it did not tell why the person was notable (see WP:BIO). I encourage you to recreate this article using your own words. I also suggest to indicate why the person is notable in the first paragraph (such as "Veruschka is a model and actress ..."). Feel free to contact me (by adding a comment to my talk page) if you have any question. - Liberatore(T) 19:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Ribeiro

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Caroline Ribeiro, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ftvnudes.com/PersonalPages/ModelsPersonalPage.php?model_id=15. As a copyright violation, Caroline Ribeiro appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Caroline Ribeiro has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Caroline Ribeiro. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Caroline Ribeiro, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

--Kinu ^t/_c 20:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia Del Rio

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Dismas|^(talk) 22:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roberta Close

Regrettably, this article was deleted as you did not include any info as to why she is notable. If you recreate the article you must include such information or the article will be deleted again. Thank you for editing Wikipedia!--File Éireann 23:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monique Olsen

I hate to add to the somewhat negative messages already here, but I thought you'd like to know that Monique Olsen has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I improve the article some, including a picture, and removed the {{prod}} tag. Still, I don't know that she has enough notability for an article here on Wikipedia. I think it should be taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, but I'm willing to wait for a few days while you find more material to put into the article. All the best, --Durin 22:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Matt Bixel

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Matt Bixel. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bixel (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]