User talk:Thegraciousfew

Band of Horses

Hi and thank you for your message. Wikipedia Manual of Style guidance on this topic is that the final comma in a list of items is acceptable but not mandatory. I prefer to include the comma (e.g., "red, white, and blue" rather than "red, white and blue") but either format is acceptable on Wikipedia. Everything counts (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Lamb on the Lam in the City

Thanks for the reply. I agree that the melody sounds a lot like "Detlef Schrempf" and have often wondered if it was merely just a reprise… still, that doesn't explain the title. Yet again, why the hell is "Detlef Schrempf" called "Detlef Schrempf"? Detlef Schrempf played for the Seattle Supersonics, which is the same city Band of Horses was formed, but it really has nothing to do with the song itself.

While we're talking about BOH, I have a few other questions you may be able to shine some light on:

Where the hell can I get a hold of Tour EP?
The song "I Go to the Barn Because I Like The" from Everything All the Time also has a strange title. What does he "like" in the barn? My theory is that the answer to the missing noun from the title is revealed in the immediate following song "Monsters". Equaling, "I Go to the Barn Because I Like The Monsters". If you listen closely—especially towards the end of "Barn"—the melodies from both songs sound very similar. The chord progression on "Barn" is D-F#m7-G-A, while the chord progression in "Monsters" is D-G-A. Pretty similar and a bit peculiar for being back-to-back on the album. I wonder if there's something there.
Is there a reason they don't perform "I Go to the Barn Because I Like The", "St. Augustine", "Lamb on the Lam (In the City)", "For Annabelle" and "Neighbor" live?

Sorry for so many questions. Lemme know what you think. Geeky Randy (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Take your time responding, I know you're on vacation. Anyway, I just realized that they played "For Annabelle" at the concert I attended in 2008, and Ben broke a glass bottle over his head during the performance. Here's the link: [1]. I always assumed the song was called "Trudy"—do you happen to know if that was the working title for "For Annabelle"? Also, too bad about "Barn" and "St. Augustine"; I love both of those songs and am dying to hear them live. Geeky Randy (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:"Lamb on the Lam (In the City)" played live in England!

It appears their last show at O2 Academy Oxford in Oxford, England (on June 11, 2010) they played "Lamb on the Lam (In the City)" for the first time ever. Maybe Ben had a little introduction before they played it explaining the history and the title of the song. It'd be nice to talk to someone who was at the show. Here's the setlist: [2]

Also here, [3], a user named doc claims that somebody said "I Go to the Barn Because I Like the" was played. That'd be cool if that was indeed the unknown song in the setlist that closed the main set. No "Is There a Ghost" either. What a setlist! Geeky Randy (talk) 22:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:"Annabelle"

Nice thoughts on "Annabelle". I also missed BOH when they came to my town two weeks ago because I had to work and only heard about it last minute. Argh! Geeky Randy (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:"Laredo"

Sorry. It must've climbed from #37 to #34. Couldn't find a source, and I believe the user who originally updated it had been a vandal in the past. Glad to see it climbing the charts; I might have to create a Wikipedia page for it soon. Geeky Randy (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:"The Great Salt Lake"

Yeah, perhaps. It'd be nice to at least show that there is a source that corroborates with the article's claim, and the only thing I could find it the summary of the article in a search engine. Do you think it's okay to provide a search engine result as a source? Geeky Randy (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Barn" and "St. Augustine"

I remember we talked before about how these two songs aren't played live very often. Live versions of these two songs surfaced before from 2006, thought you might like to know: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI7DdqGh5Ao) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AHiCf6-cfE).

Hey, have you heard this yet? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9dc3L9U6Hw) Apparently, Nov16 was also a name BoH went by. Geeky Randy (talk) 01:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can hear Ben's vocals in the Nov16 version of the song. Apparently, this song was recorded before BoH, and since Brook is credited with writing "Barn", we can at least assume it is indeed an early version of the song and not some underground cover. But I'll do some searching myself to find more info about Nov16. Do you happen to know if Grand Archives performs "Barn" or "St. Augustine" live, since Matt wrote those, or are those two songs pretty much retired? Has Ben Bridwell ever said why he doesn't perform them live—I know he didn't write them, but it's no different than playing a cover or something—does he not want to perform them without Matt or does he have a distaste for them? I jsut went to a BoH concert in Seattle last week—great show; someone threw a Detlef Schrempf t-shirt on stage and Ben put in on while he played "DS" and "The Funeral". Anyway, I'll never give up hope that he'll play either "Barn" or "SA" someday. Geeky Randy (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, buddy-- In case you're interested, here's the YouTube videos of the December 2012 performances of "I Go to the Barn Because I Like the" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GOO1Mu3p6w) and "St. Augustine" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zyq2KUUtGw). Thanks for the copy editing—always nice to have a second pair of eyes on these kinds of things. Happy Christmas from Seattle, Geeky Randy (talk) 02:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Video

Hey, in regards to our discussion, I thought you might like to see this video if you haven't yet. [4] At about 10:38, Ben makes an indirect reference to getting rid of members who just weren't right for the band. Nothing to really add to a Wikipedia article; I just thought you'd like to see it. Best, Geeky Randy (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The Gracious Few

It actually wasn't an article. The U.S. iTunes store posted the track listing when they put the album up for pre-order. --Livewire1015 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flags

Most of the flags listed in the charts violate WP:ICONDECORATION, these flagicons are simply decorative because they do not provide any additional encyclopedic information since the country's name is already in the link. The reason I did not link directly to this subsection is that some of the Billboard charts did not list U.S. In these cases I was adding U.S. to the chart information while I was removing the American flag.

There have been two discussions on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (record charts) at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (record charts)/Archive 2#Flag Icons and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (record charts)/Archive 3#Flag usage where consensus was found not to use flagicons in chart tables. If you still feel that flagicons are necessary, please start a discussion at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (record charts) or Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons) before inserting any additional flagicons into single charts. I will in agreement not remove any flagicons until you make a decision to either accept the prior consensus or to seek a new consensus. If you decide to seek a new consensus I will participate in the discussion and abide by the newly found consensus. Aspects (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"No One's Gonna Love You"

Barnstar

Thank you so so much for the barnstar. I've been waiting a long time for one of these, and I'm so grateful that you recognize the time I put in to spread the wonderful music of Band of Horses.

Single/Song title

Gerenally, I believe databases like Allmusic get things culled from record companies, etc. That doesn't mean there can't be typos though. If you are confident that Allmusic simply made an error—or you think it's more than likely it's a typo—please change the error within the article. Thanks again for all your help and support!! Best, Geeky Randy (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NoOnesGonnaLoveYou.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NoOnesGonnaLoveYou.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was me not concentrating on what I was doing. Sorted now. Iangurteen (talk) 08:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laredo

You're welcome for the barnstar, you deserve it. Also, I created an article for "Laredo". Let me know what you think. I had a hard time figuring out which Laredo the song is about (if it is being specific); Bridwell talks about writing a lot of songs close to the Canadian border which would mean Laredo, Montana, but the music video appears more cowboy/desert themed which would lead me to assume Laredo, TX. If you happen to find an answer, let me know. Thanks again for everything! Geeky Randy (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Thanks for the reply. However, the reason I believe he says "fuck" is because it is indeed edited out when they play the music video on television. Perhaps the network could've gotten the wrong lyrics and you are right the lyrics are "up", but I thought I'd pass that by you. Geeky Randy (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Live (band)

Wikipedia cannot use primary sources such as law suits to source BLP claims. If you can find a newspaper which reports the claims made in the lawsuit, then those can be used. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have linked to WP:BLP (BLP= Biography of living person). See WP:RS, Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Xinjiang Medical University

Thanks for your revision of the article "Xinjiang Medical University", I just reverted the vandalized edit but didnt got the chance to look at the article again; but thanks to you that you did saw! Appreciation on your EDIT!!! BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 07:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Very Very Best of Crowded House

Sorry I took a while to get back to you, I was going to reply, but forgot! About the edit, no problems, I try to help wherever I can. In regards to your question, unfortunately, there isn't an active archive... but the forums at australian-charts.com regularly have people asking for album and single chart positions for bands and artists who charted before 1988/9. Other forum members who own the Chart Books published by David Kent, who ran the Kent Music Report then, usually respond with a list of them, but there's already a lot of bands/artists who charted's positions there. Ss 112 17:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music video for "Dilly"

Have you seen it? Do you think this earns its own wiki page? Geeky Randy (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should hold off until it's confirmed whether it's a single or not. I mean, how notable is this music video compared to "NW Apt." or "For Annabelle", for example? There seems to be a lot of music videos off of Infinite Arms that don't feature the band. Should we treat "Dilly" any differently? If so, I'd be happy to create an article; but for now, I'm just not sure. What do you think? Geeky Randy (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and made an article for "Dilly". Let me know what you think. Also, it appears "Compliments" has been redirected to Infinite Arms. Do you agree with this? Is there anything we can do to make the song more notable? Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He Will Have His Way

G'day mate,

Thanks heaps for tidying up the article I created for He Will Have His Way. I agree with most of your removal of redlinks, but I have re-inserted the redlinks for "Oh Mercy" and "Artisan Guns". I'm sure you'll agree, they are notable bands, and there is an abundance of content on them which is easily verifiable. Therefore, I think, per WP:REDLINK it is reasonable to keep these redlinks as

In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there exists no candidate article, or article section, under any name.

Cheers mate! Teachingwedge (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem with "Kiss the Road..." see the talkpage.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia

I created an article for the Cee Lo Green song Georgia" that Band of Horses covered. Let me know what you think. I think the next article I'm going to created is "Dilly". I'll let you know when that happens. Thanks. Geeky Randy (talk) 18:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Adams

Nice work cleaning up the lead. I have made a few more edits. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RattlesnakeUSpromo.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:RattlesnakeUSpromo.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kent's Australian Chart Book

Would you happen to have this book? I'd really like to cite some individual pages from the book in preparation of nominating The Joshua Tree for FAC. Thanks. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 16:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mirage Rock

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mirage Rock, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: MIrage Rock. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 09:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mirage Rock

That's ok. All you need to do is type "MC" in the album rating's template along with the score. Check the Album Ratings template for more info. It's pretty similar with video game ratings and film ratings too. --Mjs1991 (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Ben sings Mat

I actually watched Grand Archives play in July and in October this year. Despite both shows being pretty much exactly the same, they sounded great. I snatched the set list from the stage at the July show, and the October show… well, I actually asked Mat for the set list, which he happily gave me. I thanked him for a great show and for also giving me the set list, then I shook his hand.

I had been meaning to tell you about this encounter, but I kind of lost touch with the Wikipedia community for a little while. I have also been meaning to drop by the Redwood, not only to check it out, but also to get a word with Mat. I respect not asking him tons of questions while he's at work, but maybe he'll be able to shed some light on his musical experiences and knowledge through some friendly conversation. It's a 10 minute drive from where I live, I really have no excuse not to do this.

I was never much of a Carissa's Wierd fan, but I am familiar enough (actually a die-hard fan) with Band of Horses and Grand Archives to be a good listener to his stories. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to ask when I have a chat with him. Talk soon! Geeky Randy (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool story. Thanks for the drink tip. I'll keep you posted when I talk to him. Have a Happy New Year. Geeky Randy (talk) 02:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Band of Horses

Thank you, and my apologies. There is a 10-chart limit for those tables. I just picked the ones where Band of Horses seemed to have the most success. Infex (talk) 00:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to use the weekly charts for Canada, at least until Billboard fixes the error. Infex (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: German Charts

Just found your question concerning German charts on the Infinite Arms album Talk page. These might be the links you are looking for:

http://www.musicline.de/de/chartverfolgung_summary/artist/Band+of+Horses/41418/longplay

http://www.charts.de/suche.asp?search=band+of+horses&x=10&y=3&country=de

--Cdl obelix (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Turn (Live album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chad Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

associated acts

on the Live_(band) page you reverted a change because of the number of members didn't qualify as an associated act. What is the percentage that would determine a qualifying act? Is there an official stance on this?

The reason I ask is if you look at the Foo Fighters page, you have Germs (band) with just one Foo Fighter member being part of the associated act and Tenacious D with no intersecting members (although Dave Grohl was the session drummer for them). — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamPersistent (talk • contribs) 05:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Associated Acts

Thanks for the info. Funny thing is I would argue based on the parameters that in the Audioslave example, Temple of the Dog shouldn't be there. IamPersistent (talk) 06:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thegraciousfew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thegraciousfew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TNT ^💖 20:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thegraciousfew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'm absolutely baffled as to why my account has been blocked. I used to be a very regular contributor, now I only edit occasionally but I use Wikipedia every day. I've checked my recent contributions and can't see anything even remotely controversial. I would really appreciate an explanation and would like to be unblocked please. Many thanks. UPDATE - Since I added this unblock request I have done some digging and seen that my son has created yet another Wikipedia account and once again been blocked User:Middledistance99 - I really can't be held responsible for another family member's actions. My account has been active for many years, long before he was on Wikipedia. Thegraciousfew (talk) 06:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - you were unblocked due to the discussion at Middledistance99's talk - TNT ^💖 20:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It may be wise to stop letting your son use your computer; this isn't the first time he's been disruptive on Wikipedia. PeterTheFourth (talk) 10:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You not only matched the account Middledistance99 technically, but there were also behavioural and content area similarities. Not to mention the fact you also technically matched more than one other account.. - TNT ^💖 18:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on a discussion at Middledistance99's talk, I have unblocked you - it looks like there is a reasonable explanation for the technical and behavioural similarities. As PeterTheFourth mentions above, please do consider taking further precautions so that this doesn't happen again. - TNT ^💖 20:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thegraciousfew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong commons category

Hi! Can you please explain why you are adding artist's category in the commons to the album articles? [5] -- Meisam (talk) 09:57, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RattlesnakeUSpromo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RattlesnakeUSpromo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the Good Times (Are Past & Gone) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, All the Good Times (Are Past & Gone), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All the Good Times (Are Past & Gone) has been accepted

All the Good Times (Are Past & Gone), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Melbourne

I thought the clarifier for simple plan being originally from Melbourne, Australia rather than Melbourne, Florida might be appropriate for certain quick readers from the southwestern united States Arguably. 👍 SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EdKowalczykGrace.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EdKowalczykGrace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]