User talk:Tombo78

Recent edits to Thomas Benson (American football)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Thomas Benson (American football) article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! EBY (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alanism.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alanism

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alanism, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Alan, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I read the deleted Articles for creation that you made about your "religion". Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. If you persist with edits about your "religion", you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: No, I will not. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink (singer), you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Gogo Dodo. Yintan 21:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 21:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]