User talk:Transport 2005
Welcome!
[edit]
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Devokewater|(tαlk) 19:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Short description
[edit]Hiya. In addition to the EDSUMMs/notices you will likely have seen from other editors, please consider taking a look at WP:SDLENGTH. To confirm the purpose of short descriptions and the typical length expected. In general, up to "40 characters [..] including spaces" is the norm. If a short description is 60 chars or more (or approaching 100 characters or more), then it is no longer short and is no longer serving its intended purpose. Compare, in particular, the purpose of a lead to the purpose of the short description. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Transport 2005. As many of your recent edits have been to articles that happen to be on my own watchlist, I note that several other editors have also raised concerns with very long (90-100+ character) or duplicated (redundant) "short descriptions". Can you please heed the edsumms/input from other editors? Relative to WP:SD40 norms? As noted in the WP:IDHT guideline, if the community spends more time tweaking/fixing an editor's good-faith inputs, or repeatedly explaining/highlighting guidelines, then escalation may be needed. Something that's easily avoided if convention/policy is followed... Guliolopez (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- A "short description" is supposed to be a short description, not a summary. This edit on Ireland West Airport is totally superfluous. The Banner talk 15:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sixmilebridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Banner talk 13:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rathcoole, Dublin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Deliberately ignoring any advice about the short descriptions is, in my opinion, disruptive and vandalism The Banner talk 13:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Northern Ireland, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 13:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sixmilebridge. The Banner talk 17:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Could you please respond?
[edit]There have been several issues raised with your editing. Especially adding long text or superfluous addition to short descriptions. To cite what a short description is: The short description of a Wikipedia article or of another namespace page is a concise explanation of the scope of the page. These descriptions appear in Wikipedia mobile and some desktop searches,[note 1] and help users identify the desired article. So it is not a summary. Could you please adhere to this? And could you please confirm that you have read this, understood it and will abide by the rules set for short descriptions? The Banner talk 17:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- So, you don't understand this? The Banner talk 19:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Inappropriate short descriptions
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]You have been indefinitely blocked from article space for repeated abuse of short descriptions, which are supposed to be short. Please read Wikipedia:Short description, and then read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.