User talk:Ugajin

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Ugajin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 02:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society

I have nominated Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 龗 (talk) 12:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Lunsford

Puritan efforts at propaganda and psychological warfare took advantage of Lunsford's reputation as a wild cavalier who could perpetrate almost any outrage; John Lilburne spread rumors of Lunsford's cannibalism. A folk rhyme of the era, which confused Thomas with his brother Henry, held that

The post who came from Coventry,
Riding in a red rocket,

Did tidings tell how Lunsford fell,
A child's hand in his pocket.(John Lacy, The Dramatic Works of John Lacy, edited by James Maidment and W. H. Logan, Edinburgh, William Paterson, 1875; p. 123.)

You added the above text to Thomas Lunsford at 11:57 on 22 November 2007. I am deleting the article and recreating it as a stub for copyleft incompatibility reasons, see talk:Thomas Lunsford. I've copied it here so you can re-add it to the page once I have deleted if you want to. -- PBS (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare

Thanks! I was expecting it would take months to have someone explain that table!

Proposed deletion of D. Scott Rogo

The article D. Scott Rogo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable biography of a fringe "researcher" and author. No evidence of notability, and no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Verbal chat 09:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ugajin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Blake Chen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Florio

Hi, I am researching Samuel Daniel and I notice that you added this line to his biog. "Their sister Rosa was Edmund Spenser's model for Rosalind in his The Shepherd's Calendar;" I really need to know what your source is for this quote, as I have found elsewhere that she is called Aline Daniel and it is important for my research to know if she actually called Rosaline Daniel, the muse of Edmund Spenser and Shakespeare!

I really hope you can help and thanks for your work on wikipedia.

--Billdup (talk) 23:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

well done, you have been quoted by the New York Times (and not credited) [1] - [2] hope you are doing well. Duckduckstop (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neolithic Subpluvial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neolithic Subpluvial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neolithic Subpluvial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forest of Burzee

The article Forest of Burzee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Element does not have significant coverage in reliable third party sources as mandated by the WP:GNG. A search shows primary sources and passing mentions, nothing to establish WP:Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forest of Burzee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forest of Burzee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest of Burzee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Sumner (actor, died 1649)

The article John Sumner (actor, died 1649) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find evidence he was a notable stage actor or meets general notability guidelines here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]