User talk:Wikieditmon

Welcome!

Hello, Wikieditmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Ronz (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naveen Jain, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naveen Jain, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Using the edit summary "removing irrelevant information" is not sufficient for removing well sourced content that is quite relevant to an article. If you contest this, discuss it on the talk page. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest listing

Hello Wikieditmon. Please be aware that the Naveen Jain article is under heavy scrutiny due to the complaint at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. You are welcome to join the discussion there if you have something to add. We expect that biographical articles will be well-sourced and based on reliable published information. If it happens that negative things have been published about a person, it is normal that articles will reflect the existence of such information, so long as the sources are reliable. EdJohnston (talk) 01:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]