User talk:Xtyphooncyclonex

September 2013

Hello, I'm United States Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2013 Pacific typhoon season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! United States Man (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check before editing

You replaced with information at 21Z, but there is already information at 00Z. Please check the agencies more times before editing next time. -- Meow 01:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Pacific hurricane season

Hi. Although the Best Track is maintained by the National Hurricane Center and thus may be viewed as official, it is also subject to changes before the official operational advisory. Therefore, please wait until the actual forecast package comes out (at 03z/09z/15z/21z) before changing current storm information. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014 Pacific hurricane season page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject:Tropical Cyclones

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

-- Byralaal - (talk!) 03:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi and I'm Typhoon2013! I am Filipino as well and 12y/o. Just saying if okay to be buddies in Wikipedia so I could help you with some stuff if okay to you. Thanks!

P.S Mekkhala (Amang) is still active accoding to JMA's Weather maps. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Cyclone Name Retirements

Hi there, Until such a time we have a source that clearly states that a name was retired, we can not consider a name retired as it could have been removed for other reasons such as with the names Nute/Odile earlier this month in the Southern Pacific basin.Jason Rees (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not allowed to accept or consider a name retired per the rules on original research until i see a source that i can cite stating that it is retired. The PAGASA Naming list and an assumption that all names that cause at least 300 deaths or at least PHP 1 billion is not good enough - since names can be removed for a variety of reasons.Jason Rees (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so i see that PAGASA's list of names has now been updated to put: "Note: With * is a replaced name of the decommissioned Tropical Cyclones" However that is still not good enough imo, i need a something like a press release that clearly states the names that have been retired or decommissioned before we can add them in as retired. Even better would be a list of all of the names that have gone over the years that we can cite. Jason Rees (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read, very important

Hi Xtyphooncyclonex, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reverted edit on 2015 typhoon season

Hey. I don't think I am the right person for this. I just follow the admins like Keith Edkins, Meow and Hurricanehink since they said it's a cat4 typhoon! I thought of that as well since I also found out that many websites sate it as a cat4 instead of cat3 so I agreed with them. BTW, the best track data for Higos is not next year, it is somewhere between March to April 2015. Typhoon2013 (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not involved in this particular case, but you need to cite your sources when adding entire paragraphs. You may have a source, yes, but you need to make sure to include it as a reference. Dustin (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't understand what you're saying. I haven't reverted any of your edits except 1 since Jason Rees accepted your information. I only changed the information as in Mekkhala wasn't the strongest during January, it was Typhoon Ophelia somewhere from 1951-56. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dissipation of Maysak

Well yes, Maysak according to "most" agencies, it had dissipated. But JMA is still tracking on it as a weak TD over the South China Sea, so it is still active. You know this from 2 years ago, right? Typhoon2013 (talk) 08:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the record Wiki takes the dates active from the RSMCs worldwide and no one else unless there is good reason to like a system not being (clearly) monitored by the RSMC. In Maysaks case there is no good reason to go against this policy even though it means us keeping Maysak as active for a couple of days longer than the international community would like.Jason Rees (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xtyphooncyclonex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xtyphooncyclonex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Xtyphooncyclonex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]