Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.codes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Generic top-level domain#New top-level domains. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 01:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- .codes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable gTLD - only 4500 registered domains according to the article itself. The article itself is mostly unrelated material (generic stuff about gTLDs) and the rest is original research and original synthesis (e.g. "designated for computer programming associations such as the Python Software Foundation and the Wikimedia Foundation"). PRODded once as "NN new TLD spam"; PROD removed by article creator. Kolbasz (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Generic top-level domain#New top-level domains like many of these others: List of Internet top-level domains#ICANN-era generic top-level domains —МандичкаYO 😜 21:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per Wikimandia. The article does nothing to establish notability of the subject, and much of the content is unsourced off-topic padding. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect as this is usually the norm for these here anyway. –Davey2010Talk 22:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect - Non-notable. 4500 domains insufficient. Faizan (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect. No evidence that this tld is more notable than others. Maproom (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.