Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1927 Suvanto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus is to Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1927 Suvanto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) per NASTRO, redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I only get 6 hits in Google scholar but 4 look worthwhile: a lightcurve study, two spectral studies, and a physical modeling study. So we may have enough sources and varied-enough sources to say something about this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Can be made into more than just a bot copy of the JPL SBDB. -- Kheider (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.