Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 World Fencing Championships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 World Fencing Championships

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about a future sporting event. - Mr X 21:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Host is known, number of events is known, reliable sources are shown in the article. 46.211.1.243 (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC) — 46.211.1.243 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep per WP:CRYSTAL - "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliably sourced article about a future world championship. Enough is known to keep it. Smartyllama (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, i know that under WP:CRYSTAL this will be a keeper but its funny that the 2017 World Fencing Championships hasn't even taken place and this will essentially be an empty article for some 12 months, i look forward to the article "2061 sightings of Halley's Comet"Coolabahapple (talk) 02:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to World Fencing Championships Insufficient coverage to rise to the level of Balloon Boy to satisfy WP:SUSTAINED and WP:EVENT. Unscintillating (talk) 04:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.